The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 21 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Confirmation emails.
ichronoz shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 21 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 21 | 0 |
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
ichronoz |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #38 2 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #37 3 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #23 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
ichronoz |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #45 1 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #46 1 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #39 2 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #36 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
ichronoz |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 4 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #26 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine can be pivotal for your hotel’s direct booking strategy and operational efficiency. Anand Systems Inc.'s ASI WebRes and ichronoz serve different core functions, with ASI WebRes focusing on reservations and distribution, while ichronoz emphasizes review management and customer feedback insights. For hoteliers seeking a proven, feature-rich booking engine with broad integration, ASI WebRes is the more established choice. But if your priority is review analysis and customer satisfaction, ichronoz might appeal — though it currently lacks reviews or market presence.
Given the extensive review data, ASI WebRes’s higher rating, and its broad feature set, it’s clear which product offers more confidence and utility for hotels actively seeking booking solutions. Will your hotel benefit more from a comprehensive booking engine or from customer review insights? Let’s explore.
Both products aim to improve hotel revenue, but they do so very differently. ASI WebRes addresses core booking and distribution needs, centralizing reservations, rates, and inventory management across multiple channels. In contrast, ichronoz focuses on review aggregation and sentiment analysis, offering insights into customer feedback rather than reservation management.
ASI WebRes’s strengths lie in its real-time reservation management, distribution partner integrations, and extensive feature set—27 features in total, including multi-channel connectivity, customizable rates, and marketing tools. Conversely, ichronoz has no listed features, reviews, or integrations, and its focus is entirely on review summarization and recommendations. Do you need a robust booking engine today, or are you primarily analyzing customer feedback? The decision hinges on your hotel’s immediate operational priorities.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable booking engine with built-in distribution, real-time inventory updates, and extensive integrations, go with ASI WebRes. It’s supported by 20 recent reviews, with a 99% likelihood to recommend, and high ratings for ease of use, customer support, and value.
If your team is focused on understanding customer sentiment from reviews and leveraging AI-driven insights to improve satisfaction, ichronoz might seem appealing. However, with no reviews, features, or proven market presence, it’s a less dependable solution for immediate booking needs. Currently, ASI’s proven track record makes it the safer, more strategic choice for hotels seeking revenue growth and operational efficiency.
ASI WebRes boasts a 4.95/5 rating for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its straightforward workflow, intuitive interface, and seamless onboarding process—average onboarding score of 4.8/5. Reviewers highlight its user-friendly layout, quick support, and simple room management functions.
In stark contrast, ichronoz has a 0/5 ease of use rating, with no reviews or user feedback available. The lack of user data indicates no proven interface or onboarding experience. Based on available ratings and recent reviews, edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes offers 27 features, including mobile responsiveness, special offers, multi-channel booking integrations with TripAdvisor, Google Hotel Ads, multi-lingual support, rate comparisons, and custom add-ons. These features collectively support revenue growth, operational flexibility, and guest engagement.
ichronoz has no listed features or capabilities, making it impossible to compare features meaningfully. The absence of documented functionalities suggests it is not a comprehensive booking engine. Edge: ASI WebRes.
Customer support is a key strength for ASI WebRes, with a 4.85/5 rating and recent reviews commending prompt, professional, and courteous assistance. Support staff resolve issues quickly, often in minutes, and onboarding is smooth.
There are no reviews, support ratings, or customer feedback available for ichronoz, indicating no established support reputation. Without proven support, ASI WebRes clearly leads in this area. Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes integrates with 19 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, OTAs like TripAdvisor, and revenue management tools like Duetto. These integrations streamline operations and enhance distribution control.
ichronoz has no listed integrations or partner connections, limiting its utility for hotels requiring multi-channel management. The extensive third-party connections of ASI WebRes provide a significant advantage. Edge: ASI WebRes.
With 20 recent reviews, ASI WebRes has a 99% likelihood of recommendation, and an overall rating of 0/5—this green light reflects strong satisfaction. Reviewers appreciate its clarity, support, and ease of use, especially for front desk and operations.
In contrast, ichronoz has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine hoteliers' satisfaction. Based on available data, ASI WebRes is the clear favorite. Edge: ASI WebRes.
Pricing information for both products is unavailable—neither offers transparent pricing or trial details. Given the depth of features and proven support, ASI WebRes likely involves a custom quote based on property size, while ichronoz’s absence of pricing suggests it may not be fully commercialized.
Without transparent costs, the decision hinges on the value and confidence derived from reviews and features. For now, ASI WebRes’s track record offers a more secure investment.
Not ideal if your hotel market is primarily review or reputation management-focused, as this is outside ASI’s core strength.
Given the lack of reviews and features, ichronoz appears better suited for post-stay feedback analysis rather than core reservation functions.
The core difference between the two lies in their purpose: ASI WebRes is a comprehensive booking engine built for operational efficiency and revenue growth through distribution and reservation management. ichronoz, on the other hand, offers AI-driven insights into customer reviews—a valuable tool for reputation management but not a substitute for a booking engine.
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich booking platform, go with ASI WebRes. Its high ratings, extensive integrations, and broad market presence make it the clear choice for hotels seeking to improve reservations and distribution.
Choose ichronoz if your primary goal is review analysis and customer sentiment insights, and your operational booking system is already in place. However, be aware that without reviews or proven features, it remains an untested option compared to ASI WebRes’s established track record.
In conclusion, for hotels focused on operational efficiency and direct revenue growth, ASI WebRes offers a more reliable and feature-complete solution. If reputation management through review insights is your main concern, consider ichronoz, but only as a supplementary tool rather than your primary booking engine.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
ichronoz |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, ASI WebRes and ichronoz share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
ichronoz |
|---|---|---|
| Google Hotel Ads Bookings | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Tripadvisor Bookings |
Showing top differences. 15 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI WebRes and ichronoz share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI WebRes offers 19 verified integration partners, while ichronoz offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI WebRes leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI WebRes: No. ichronoz: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 0 and ichronoz has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property