The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 21 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Confirmation emails.
Jumbo Tours shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 21 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 21 | 0 |
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Jumbo Tours |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #38 2 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #37 3 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #23 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Jumbo Tours |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #45 1 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #46 1 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #39 2 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #36 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Jumbo Tours |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 4 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #26 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel's success, especially when evaluating options like ASI WebRes by Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and Jumbo Tours. Both aim to streamline reservations, but they serve different market segments and come with distinct strengths. ASI WebRes offers a well-rounded, hotel-focused solution with a history of reliability and extensive features, while Jumbo Tours caters more to tour operators and travel agencies, with less recent user feedback. How do these differences impact your decision?
ASI WebRes and Jumbo Tours both address online booking challenges but do so with very different approaches. ASI WebRes integrates directly with property management systems, offering a dedicated hotel booking engine that emphasizes real-time availability, multi-channel distribution, and customizable rate plans. Jumbo Tours, meanwhile, is tailored for tour operators and travel agencies, focusing on supplier integration, client reservations, and trip management. Do you need a hotel-specific system or a broader travel management platform?
ASI WebRes’s recent reviews—20 in the last six months—show high satisfaction, especially around ease of use and support, with 99% likelihood to recommend. Jumbo Tours has no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess current performance or support quality. Given this, ASI’s focus on hotel operations and recent positive feedback make it the clearer choice for your hotel.
If your hotel needs a dedicated, reliable booking engine that integrates seamlessly with a property management system, go with ASI WebRes. It supports multi-route booking, rate plan comparisons, and features like Tripadvisor and Google Hotel Ads integrations—ideal for independent hotels or larger portfolios aiming for direct bookings.
Choose Jumbo Tours if your hotel operates within a tour or travel agency framework, needing complex supplier integrations and client reservation management. However, since Jumbo Tours lacks recent reviews and a clear hotel focus, ASI WebRes remains the better option for most hotels seeking a straightforward booking solution.
Based on current data, ASI WebRes scores a near-perfect 4.95/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its user-friendly interface and efficient onboarding process. Users highlight how intuitive the system is, with quick support and simple workflows that reduce staff training time.
Jumbo Tours has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its usability and onboarding experience unknown. Without user feedback, it's impossible to gauge how quickly your team can adapt or how support compares.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes offers 27 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, multi-lingual support, special offers, rate plan comparisons, Google and Tripadvisor integration, and configurable add-ons—covering every essential aspect of hotel booking management.
Jumbo Tours provides no specific features or feature count, focusing instead on broader travel management. If feature richness is critical for your hotel’s online booking experience, ASI WebRes’s dedicated hotel features give it a decisive edge.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes boasts a support rating of 4.85/5 with recent user reviews praising its prompt, knowledgeable assistance and seamless onboarding. Users describe the support as courteous and highly responsive, leading to a high likelihood (99%) of recommending the product.
Jumbo Tours has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to compare support quality. Without current feedback, ASI WebRes’s proven support infrastructure clearly stands out.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes is integrated with 19 verified partners, including prominent platforms such as SiteMinder, Cendyn, and Google Analytics, facilitating distribution, marketing, and analytics. Jumbo Tours, on the other hand, offers no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity and automation potential.
For a hotel seeking a booking engine that plays well with existing systems and enhances operational efficiency, ASI WebRes’s robust integration network is a clear advantage.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
With 20 recent reviews, ASI WebRes has a high customer satisfaction rate, reflected in its 99% likelihood to recommend, especially among independent hotels and small chains. Reviewers appreciate its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Jumbo Tours has no recent reviews or ratings, so its user satisfaction remains unverified. Given the proven positive feedback for ASI WebRes, it remains the preferred choice for hotels.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing structures, indicating that quotes are likely customized based on hotel size and needs. However, ASI WebRes’s absence of an implementation fee and its overall value scores suggest a predictable cost structure for hotels.
Jumbo Tours also states no fixed pricing details, but the lack of recent reviews and transparent pricing info makes it harder to evaluate value.
Not ideal if your hotel operates strictly as a tour operator or travel agency without a need for hotel management features.
Not ideal if your hotel is an independent property seeking a dedicated booking engine with integrations and recent support data.
The core difference is that ASI WebRes is a hotel-centric booking engine with a solid track record, while Jumbo Tours primarily caters to tour operators and travel agencies.
Choose ASI WebRes if you want a reliable, feature-rich, hotel-focused solution that integrates with your PMS and distribution channels. Its recent reviews, high satisfaction, and extensive integrations make it the clear choice for most hotels.
Opt for Jumbo Tours only if your operation is heavily oriented toward travel or tour management, though the lack of recent user feedback leaves this option less certain for hotel-specific needs.
In summary, for your hotel’s online booking efficiency, customer experience, and operational support, ASI WebRes stands out as the superior option based on recent data and proven performance.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Jumbo Tours |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, ASI WebRes and Jumbo Tours share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Jumbo Tours |
|---|---|---|
| Google Hotel Ads Bookings | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Tripadvisor Bookings |
Showing top differences. 15 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI WebRes and Jumbo Tours share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI WebRes offers 19 verified integration partners, while Jumbo Tours offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI WebRes leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI WebRes: No. Jumbo Tours: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 0 and Jumbo Tours has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property