The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 44 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
LodgIQ shines when it comes to technical issues and support response , with exclusive features like Fully automated revenue management and Controlled Automation/Algorithm Customization.
MyForecast shines , with exclusive features like Open Pricing and Smart Spreading Technology.
Side-by-side ratings based on 44 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 31 | 13 |
After analyzing 44 verified reviews, LodgIQ users most value its technical issues and support response, data analysis and reporting, user-friendly interface, while MyForecast users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Issues and Support Response
▾
|
|
|
+
Data Analysis and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
How each product ranks among Revenue Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #30 3 reviews | #27 5 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #26 6 reviews | #27 7 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #10 7 reviews | #27 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #20 18 reviews | #37 4 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #15 21 reviews | #31 5 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #14 17 reviews | #41 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #26 2 reviews | #25 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 28 reviews | #34 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #31 3 reviews | #19 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #16 0 reviews | — |
Choosing between LodgIQ by LodgIQ and MyForecast RMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational complexity. Both systems aim to optimize revenue through automation and data-driven insights, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market focus. LodgIQ, with its more extensive feature set and larger review base, offers a comprehensive AI-powered solution suited for more complex or larger hotels. MyForecast, however, provides a leaner, user-friendly interface ideal for smaller hotels or groups seeking straightforward automation.
Are you ready to dive into the key differences to determine which platform aligns best with your hotel’s strategy?
Both LodgIQ and MyForecast serve the core purpose of revenue management, but they approach it differently. LodgIQ uses advanced AI and machine learning to deliver highly detailed, adaptive forecasts, supported by a broad suite of features like channel management, market intelligence, and automation tools. Conversely, MyForecast emphasizes guided procedures, business intelligence, and automation with a focus on simplifying revenue management for hotels of all sizes.
LodgIQ’s platform is more robust, with a higher review count (26 reviews versus 12 for MyForecast), and recent reviews indicating stronger confidence in its capabilities. Its more extensive feature list includes automated room-type pricing, 365-day forward pricing, and open API integrations, making it suitable for hotels with complex revenue management needs. MyForecast’s strengths lie in its ease of use, clear automation, and competitive price point, appealing to hotels and groups needing reliable automation without complexity.
Given the data, LodgIQ is the more proven and comprehensive choice, but your decision depends on whether your team prefers advanced customization or straightforward automation. Would you prioritize detailed AI-driven insights or ease of implementation?
If your hotel needs a highly detailed, AI-powered revenue management platform capable of handling complex property portfolios with extensive automation, go with LodgIQ. Its features like multi-property dashboards, market insights, and automated pricing updates are designed for hotels that require sophisticated, adaptive strategies.
If your hotel or group prefers a straightforward, intuitive system with guided procedures and automation tailored to operational simplicity, MyForecast is the better fit. It’s ideal for independent hotels, smaller groups, or those new to revenue management automation, offering reliable tools like dynamic price prediction and rate analysis without the complexity.
For hotels seeking advanced AI and detailed customization, LodgIQ’s larger feature set and proven market presence make it the preferred choice. Conversely, for hotels prioritizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and cost-effective automation, MyForecast is the safer bet.
LodgIQ scores 4.67 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviewers praising its intuitive, visually appealing interface that simplifies complex data analysis. Its onboarding process is rated 4.59, with some reviews mentioning occasional slow data loading and minor navigation issues, but support is generally responsive.
MyForecast slightly outperforms LodgIQ with a 4.92 rating, thanks to its straightforward guided procedures and automation features. Users find it highly intuitive and effective for daily revenue tasks, with reviews emphasizing its user-friendly design and efficient customer support.
Edge: MyForecast.
LodgIQ offers a significantly larger suite of features—36 exclusive functionalities including fully automated revenue management, channel manager integration, 365-day forward pricing, market intelligence data, AI optimization, and customizable dashboards. It also provides tools for managing exceptions, group pricing, and detailed market insights, making it suitable for operationally complex hotels.
MyForecast provides three unique features only in its package: open pricing, smart spreading technology, and a price explanation tool. While these are valuable, they do not match the breadth of LodgIQ’s capabilities.
Edge: LodgIQ.
LodgIQ’s support rating is 4.88 out of 5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and helpfulness, although some mention delays when technical issues arise. LodgIQ’s support team is known for being supportive and proactive, but occasional slow responses are noted.
MyForecast scores a perfect 5 out of 5 in support, with reviews highlighting the team’s efficiency, availability, and user-friendly assistance. Many users appreciate the quick resolution times and personalized guidance.
Edge: MyForecast.
LodgIQ boasts 25 verified integration partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Lighthouse, and property management systems like RMS and Mews. It also offers an open API, broadening its connectivity options for complex hotel setups.
MyForecast has 15 verified partners, including popular tools like WuBook, Vertical Booking, and hotelcube, but fewer integrations than LodgIQ. Shared partners include SiteMinder and Oracle Hospitality, but LodgIQ’s wider ecosystem supports more extensive customization.
Edge: LodgIQ.
LodgIQ has received 26 reviews, all recent, with a 5/5 overall rating and a 9.58/10 NPS score, indicating high satisfaction. Hotels in the luxury and city-center segments particularly rate LodgIQ highly, appreciating its advanced features and user interface.
MyForecast has 12 reviews, also recent, with a perfect 5/5 rating and a 9.67/10 NPS score. Its user-friendly approach appeals strongly to independent hotels and smaller groups, especially those valuing automation and simplicity.
Given the more extensive review base and higher overall rating, LodgIQ is the more highly-rated system by hoteliers.
Edge: LodgIQ.
LodgIQ’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, but it’s known that implementation costs are generally higher for comprehensive enterprise features. Its subscription model is typically tailored, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
MyForecast charges a base price of $1,000 monthly, with no additional implementation fees or freemium options. Its transparent pricing is favorable for hotels seeking predictable costs.
In summary, LodgIQ’s cost may be justified by its extensive features, while MyForecast provides a straightforward, predictable pricing structure.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
LodgIQ is a comprehensive, AI-driven revenue management platform designed for hotels with complex needs and larger portfolios. It offers a broad feature set, top-tier integrations, and a proven track record, making it ideal if you seek depth, automation, and market intelligence.
MyForecast provides a simpler, more accessible solution focused on automation, guided procedures, and straightforward analytics, perfect for smaller hotels or groups demanding quick setup and ease of use.
Choose LodgIQ if your hotel needs advanced customization, detailed market insights, and multi-property management. Opt for MyForecast if ease of use, automation, and predictable costs are higher priorities.
In conclusion, LodgIQ is the more comprehensive and better-rated option backed by recent reviews and a higher review count. However, if your hotel values simplicity and affordability, MyForecast remains a strong choice.
Revenue Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, LodgIQ and MyForecast RMS share 12 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Automated Room-Type Pricing | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Fully automated revenue management | ||
| Open API | ||
| Open Pricing | ||
| Price Explanation | ||
| Single Sign-On | ||
| Smart Spreading Technology |
Showing top differences. 27 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Critical mentions focus on occasional technical issues like slow updates, data refresh problems, and system lags. Additionally, some reviews highlight... Critical mentions focus on occasional technical issues like slow updates, data refresh problems, and system lags. Additionally, some reviews highlight slow customer support response times, emphasizing the need for quicker issue resolution to maintain operational efficiency.
Users frequently mention the comprehensive data analysis and reporting features of LodgiQ. The ability to compare historical and current data effectiv... Users frequently mention the comprehensive data analysis and reporting features of LodgiQ. The ability to compare historical and current data effectively, view market metrics, and produce detailed reports supports better strategic planning and operational decisions.
Many reviews highlight LodgiQ's user-friendly interface that makes navigation and data analysis straightforward. Users appreciate the intuitive design... Many reviews highlight LodgiQ's user-friendly interface that makes navigation and data analysis straightforward. Users appreciate the intuitive design and ease of use, which helps streamline their daily tasks and improve efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. LodgIQ and MyForecast RMS share many core Revenue Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. LodgIQ offers 25 verified integration partners, while MyForecast RMS offers 15. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. MyForecast RMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
LodgIQ: No. MyForecast RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Revenue Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. LodgIQ has an HT Score of 70 and MyForecast has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor