The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 21 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Confirmation emails.
Mastercamping shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 21 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 21 | 0 |
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #38 2 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #37 3 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #23 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #45 1 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #46 1 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #39 2 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #36 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 4 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #26 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel's operational efficiency and revenue growth. Both ASI WebRes by Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and Mastercamping (MasterASP) aim to streamline reservations, but they serve different hotel types and needs. ASI WebRes offers a broad set of features and a strong global presence, while Mastercamping focuses on campsites and holiday parks. Which product aligns best with your property’s specific requirements?
ASI WebRes is a well-established booking engine integrated within a comprehensive hotel management ecosystem, offering real-time reservation and inventory control. Mastercamping is tailored specifically for campsites and holiday parks, focusing on simplifying booking processes and guest management for outdoor accommodations.
ASI WebRes’s extensive feature list and broad integration options make it suitable for independent hotels, motels, resorts, and multi-property portfolios seeking a scalable solution. In contrast, Mastercamping prioritizes ease of use and automation for campsite operators, but it lacks the global reach and third-party integrations of ASI WebRes. Do you need a flexible solution for a variety of hotel types, or a specialized system for outdoor lodging?
If your hotel needs a full-featured booking engine with multi-channel distribution, real-time rate and availability sync, and robust integration options, go with ASI WebRes. Its 20 reviews in the last six months, all highly positive, attest to its reliability and ongoing support, especially for mid-size and large properties.
If your property is a campsite, holiday park, or outdoor lodging facility focused on simple reservation management, Mastercamping might seem appealing. However, with zero recent reviews and no documented features or integrations, it’s difficult to verify its suitability or effectiveness. Given ASI’s recent review volume and high ratings, ASI WebRes is the more proven choice.
Based on review scores, ASI WebRes’s ease of use is rated at 4.95/5, with users praising its intuitive interface, organized workflows, and quick onboarding. Customers mention that the platform simplifies daily operations and reduces manual errors, with technical support resolving issues promptly.
Mastercamping, on the other hand, has no available reviews or ratings to gauge its user-friendliness or onboarding process. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to assess whether it offers a similarly smooth experience. Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes boasts 27 distinct features, including mobile responsiveness, special offers, Google Hotel Ads integration, multi-room bookings, multi-lingual support, rate plan comparisons, and social media booking options. It also supports cross-channel distribution, customizable rate plans, and comprehensive reporting, making it suitable for complex hotel operations.
Mastercamping offers no documented or reviews-based features, making it impossible to compare feature sets accurately. Given the extensive capabilities of ASI WebRes, it clearly provides a richer, more flexible feature suite. Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI’s support team is rated at 4.85/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, courteous, and knowledgeable assistance. Customers appreciate seamless onboarding, prompt issue resolution, and ongoing support that helps optimize operations.
With no reviews or support data available for Mastercamping, there’s no evidence to suggest it offers comparable customer service. The absence of recent customer feedback makes ASI’s support reputation the safer choice. Edge: ASI WebRes.
ASI WebRes integrates with 19 verified partners, including major channel managers, OTAs, and analytics platforms like SiteMinder, Cendyn, and Duetto. These integrations allow for real-time rate and availability updates, financial management, and marketing automation.
Mastercamping has no listed or verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other essential hotel systems. For a property needing comprehensive connectivity, ASI WebRes provides a clear advantage. Edge: ASI WebRes.
With 20 recent reviews, all rating ASI WebRes at an overall 0/5, yet its individual support and ease-of-use ratings are outstanding. Users across independent hotels and resorts consistently commend its reliability, efficiency, and support, giving a strong indication of satisfaction.
Mastercamping lacks recent reviews and any documented user ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of ASI’s reviews, hoteliers clearly rate ASI WebRes higher. Edge: ASI WebRes.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly available, and neither offers a trial or freemium version. ASI WebRes’s pricing is typically custom, often based on property size and features required, while Mastercamping’s costs are unspecified.
Without clear pricing, your decision should focus on proven features, support, and integration quality. The lack of transparent costs favors choosing the more established ASI WebRes, which offers more confidence in value and ongoing support.
Not ideal if your property is a small, single-outlet operation with very simple booking needs or outdoor-focused accommodations.
Not ideal if you operate a hotel, resort, or property requiring extensive integrations, advanced reporting, or multi-channel marketing.
ASI WebRes offers a full suite of features, extensive integrations, and proven support, making it the better choice for most hotels. Its recent review volume and positive ratings affirm its reliability and capacity to grow with your property’s needs.
Mastercamping is narrowly targeted at outdoor lodging, but the lack of recent reviews, features, and integrations makes it a risky pick for hotels seeking a dependable booking engine. Unless your property is a campsite or holiday park with very basic needs, ASI WebRes remains the recommended option.
If your property needs a flexible, feature-rich booking engine with strong support and integrations, ASI WebRes is the clear winner. For niche outdoor accommodations with minimal complexity, consider Mastercamping—but proceed carefully due to limited data.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Mastercamping |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, ASI WebRes and Mastercamping (MasterASP) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| Google Hotel Ads Bookings | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Tripadvisor Bookings |
Showing top differences. 15 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI WebRes and Mastercamping (MasterASP) share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI WebRes offers 19 verified integration partners, while Mastercamping (MasterASP) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI WebRes leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI WebRes: No. Mastercamping (MasterASP): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 0 and Mastercamping has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property