The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Omnibees shines in ease of use , with exclusive features like Dynamic Pricing.
SHR Group shines in onboarding — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Reporting Dashboard and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 56 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, Omnibees users most value its , while SHR Group users highlight personalized customer success support, user-friendly interface, integration with third-party systems. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Personalized Customer Success Support
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
AI-Driven Booking Engine
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Extensive Reporting Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Cloud-Based System
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 1 reviews | #4 28 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 11 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #5 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 34 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #16 1 reviews | #5 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #5 18 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #7 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 34 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #10 1 reviews | #4 18 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #7 1 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #6 2 reviews |
When choosing a hotel reservations system, your goal is to find a platform that streamlines distribution, enhances revenue, and offers reliable support. Omnibees and SHR Group both address these needs, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. Omnibees, despite its lower overall rating and limited review data, offers a simple, easy-to-use interface, while SHR Group provides a feature-rich, well-supported solution with a broader global footprint. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s current needs and future growth?
Both Omnibees and SHR Group aim to optimize hotel distribution and booking management, but they differ in maturity and scope. Omnibees, founded in 2010, is a newer platform with a focus on distribution and marketing, largely serving markets in Europe, South America, Asia Pacific, and North America. SHR Group, established in 1987, operates globally with a presence in 11 countries, tackling a broader range of hotel types, especially luxury, boutique, and resort segments.
Omnibees has a limited review count—just one review in the last six months—indicating less recent user feedback and a lower overall rating (3.5/5). In contrast, SHR Group boasts 49 reviews, with a high average rating of 4.77/5 and recent insights, making its feedback more relevant and reliable. Its strong support and extensive features give it a clear edge for hoteliers seeking proven reliability.
Both products solve distribution challenges; however, SHR Group’s more comprehensive feature set and recent positive reviews make it the safer bet for hotels needing robust, scalable solutions. Are you comfortable with a newer, less proven platform, or do you prefer a mature solution with a broad feature set?
If your hotel needs a highly flexible, feature-rich platform capable of managing complex distribution channels and revenue strategies, SHR Group is the clear choice. Its extensive suite of 14 exclusive features—such as guest profiles, RMS connectivity, multi-property management, and booking rules—addresses the needs of mid-sized and large hotels that require detailed control and integration.
Omnibees is better suited for smaller hotels or those seeking a straightforward distribution solution. Its single unique feature—dynamic pricing—may be enough for properties with basic needs and limited complexity. If your hotel is looking to grow, scale, or implement advanced revenue management tactics, SHR Group’s proven track record and comprehensive feature set provide a significant advantage.
For hotels prioritizing ease of use and simplicity, Omnibees offers a straightforward onboarding experience, but SHR’s broader capabilities justify its more involved setup for properties with complex distribution needs. Which profile best matches your hotel’s current operations and growth plans?
Omnibees scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, indicating an intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Its simplicity appeals particularly to smaller teams or properties with limited technical resources, and its minimal learning curve facilitates quick staff adoption.
SHR Group, while slightly behind with a rating of 4.61/5, still offers a user-friendly experience, especially considering its extensive feature set. Reviews highlight that SHR’s interface is generally easy to navigate, though some users mention room for UI improvements and menu navigation issues.
Edge: Omnibees. Its higher ease-of-use rating and focus on simplicity make it ideal if quick deployment and minimal staff training are priorities.
SHR Group offers significantly more features—14 exclusive features compared to Omnibees’ single unique offering (dynamic pricing). Features like guest profiles, call center functionality, RMS connectivity, PMS integration, booking rules, cancellation policies, and multi-property management provide a comprehensive toolkit for large or complex hotel operations.
Omnibees’ limited feature set focuses primarily on distribution and marketing, which may suffice for smaller or less complex properties. Its single feature—dynamic pricing—can help optimize revenue but lacks the broader control and customization available in SHR.
Edge: SHR Group. Its extensive and varied capabilities make it suitable for hotels with complex distribution, revenue, and operational needs.
Omnibees’s customer support is rated a perfect 5/5, with reviews praising their account management team and constant platform development. Users mention that Omnibees’s team is responsive and helpful, though some feedback notes the platform is still evolving due to its relative newness.
SHR Group’s support, rated 4.76/5, is also highly regarded, with reviews emphasizing personalized, proactive assistance. Users describe SHR as dependable, with a support team that is quick to respond and knowledgeable, which is vital for managing complex systems.
Edge: Omnibees. Its slightly higher support rating and positive user feedback make it a strong choice for hotels valuing responsive assistance.
SHR Group’s platform integrates with 81 verified partners, including key hospitality systems like PMS, RMS, and OTA platforms, giving it a significant advantage. Shared integrations with Omnibees and SHR include popular partners like TripAdvisor, Infor, and IDeaS, but SHR’s extensive partner list offers greater flexibility for connecting with diverse systems.
Omnibees’s 25 verified partners are fewer, limiting its integration scope, especially for larger hotels with complex tech stacks. If your hotel relies heavily on third-party integrations, SHR Group’s broader ecosystem provides more options.
Edge: SHR Group. Its extensive partner network supports more sophisticated, multilayered integrations necessary for larger or multi-property hotels.
SHR Group’s recent reviews overwhelmingly rate it highly, with a 4.77/5 score and 93% likelihood to recommend. Property reviews highlight its robustness, support quality, and extensive features, especially from boutique, resort, and independent hotels.
Omnibees’s reviews are sparse, with a 3.5/5 rating based on a single recent review. Its lower rating and limited feedback make SHR Group the preferred choice for hoteliers seeking proven satisfaction and reliable performance.
Edge: SHR Group. The volume and recency of reviews provide stronger confidence in its performance and user satisfaction.
Both products do not publicly share detailed pricing, but they operate on custom quotes based on hotel size, complexity, and requirements. Omnibees’s pricing model appears to be straightforward without additional fees, while SHR’s platform may involve tiered or volume-based fees due to its extensive features.
Since exact pricing is unavailable, your decision should consider the value of additional features, support, and integration capabilities relative to your budget. Both vendors offer flexible pricing tailored to your hotel’s scale.
Not ideal if your hotel requires complex distribution, multi-property management, or advanced revenue controls.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a lightweight, minimal feature system or has limited technical staff.
SHR Group offers a full-featured, well-supported platform with a broad integration network and proven high user satisfaction, making it ideal for larger, complex hotels. Its high review volume and recent positive feedback give it a clear advantage in reliability and performance.
Omnibees provides a straightforward, easy-to-use system suitable for smaller hotels or those with basic distribution needs. Its simplicity can be a plus if your hotel values quick deployment and minimal learning curves.
For hotels aiming to grow, scale operations, or require advanced distribution management, SHR Group stands out as the more dependable choice. Conversely, if your hotel needs a simple, budget-friendly solution, Omnibees may suffice, but be aware of its limited feature set and recent review scarcity.
According to HTR's product database, Omnibees and SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) share 6 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Call center functionality | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| RMS connectivity | ||
| Reporting Dashboard |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
SHR's customer success team is often highlighted as outstanding, providing proactive and tailored support. This level of service helps in both everyda... SHR's customer success team is often highlighted as outstanding, providing proactive and tailored support. This level of service helps in both everyday inquiries and major projects, significantly easing the management of hotel operations.
SHR's systems, particularly CRS and CRO, are frequently described as user-friendly and easy to navigate. This ease of use contributes to efficient ope... SHR's systems, particularly CRS and CRO, are frequently described as user-friendly and easy to navigate. This ease of use contributes to efficient operations and quicker onboarding of new users.
The ability to seamlessly integrate with third-party systems like PMS and other hotel management tools is a strong point for SHR. Users find this inte... The ability to seamlessly integrate with third-party systems like PMS and other hotel management tools is a strong point for SHR. Users find this integral for smooth operations and efficient management.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews mention the need for more extensive and user-friendly reporting options within SHR's systems. This includes ad-hoc analysis capabiliti... Several reviews mention the need for more extensive and user-friendly reporting options within SHR's systems. This includes ad-hoc analysis capabilities and more detailed insight into key metrics.
A few users express a desire for a more fully cloud-based experience to minimize downtime during upgrades. This would align SHR with modern technology... A few users express a desire for a more fully cloud-based experience to minimize downtime during upgrades. This would align SHR with modern technology trends and enhance system availability.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Omnibees and SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Omnibees offers 25 verified integration partners, while SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) offers 81. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Omnibees leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Omnibees: No. SHR Central Reservation System (CRS): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Omnibees has an HT Score of 0 and SHR Group has 50. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property