Quinta vs. re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging): Which Is Right for You?

Updated May 15, 2026  ·  364 verified reviews analyzed

TLDR

We analyzed 364 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:

Quinta shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Mobile App.

re:amaze shines .

See the full breakdown below ↓

How Does Quinta Compare to re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging)?

Side-by-side ratings based on 364 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.

HTScore
84
0
Likelihood to Recommend
94%
0%
Ease of Use
4.8/5
0.0/5
Customer Support
4.8/5
0.0/5
Value for Money
4.6/5
0.0/5
Starting Price From $200/mo Contact sales
Verified Reviews 364 0

What Are the Pros and Cons of Quinta vs re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging)?

After analyzing 364 verified reviews, Quinta users most value its customer experience improvement, automation of guest communication, customization capabilities, while re:amaze users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.

Quinta Quinta re:amaze re:amaze
Pros
+ Customer Experience Improvement
+ Automation of Guest Communication
+ Customization Capabilities
+ Integration with Booking Engines and Other Tools
Cons
Challenges with Handling Complex Queries

Quinta vs re:amaze: Rankings by Hotel Segment

How each product ranks among Hotel Chatbots vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.

By Hotel Size

Segment Quinta Quinta re:amaze re:amaze
Small (10-24 rooms) #2 82 reviews
Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) #2 181 reviews
Large (75-199 rooms) #2 54 reviews
X-Large (200+ rooms) #2 27 reviews

By Property Type

Segment Quinta Quinta re:amaze re:amaze
Boutique #2 168 reviews
Luxury #2 117 reviews
Branded / Chain #3 89 reviews
Extended Stay #3 29 reviews

By Region

Segment Quinta Quinta re:amaze re:amaze
North America #5 29 reviews
Europe #1 237 reviews
Asia Pacific #5 9 reviews
Middle East #1 15 reviews

The Decision

Choosing between Quinta by Quinta and re:amaze for your hotel’s chatbot needs hinges on what your team prioritizes. Quinta offers a data-driven, AI-powered engagement platform that structures hotel data for AI systems and enhances direct bookings. Conversely, re:amaze functions as a customer support platform emphasizing live chat, multi-channel messaging, and automation for websites and apps.

Both products aim to improve guest communication, but Quinta is built specifically for the hospitality industry’s data management and AI integration, while re:amaze excels in real-time, multi-channel support. Which aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?

Is Quinta or re:amaze Better for Hotels?

Quinta primarily addresses the challenge of making hotel data accessible and useful in an AI-driven booking environment. Its core strength lies in collecting, structuring, and distributing hotel data across platforms, enabling Velma to engage travelers actively and convert leads into bookings. re:amaze, on the other hand, is designed for centralized customer support through live chat and messaging, focusing on resolving guest inquiries efficiently and increasing satisfaction.

The difference is clear: Quinta turns hotel data into a strategic asset for AI and bookings, whereas re:amaze is optimized for handling guest conversations across channels in real time. If your goal is to leverage structured data for AI-driven marketing and booking, Quinta is the better fit. If you need a support system for handling live visitor questions and automating customer service, re:amaze is more suited.

Quinta vs re:amaze: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs to enhance direct booking rates through intelligent data management and AI engagement, go with Quinta. Its ability to structure and distribute structured hotel data makes Velma a highly effective conversion tool, especially given its high reviews and recent positive feedback. For hotels with a focus on data accuracy, AI-driven personalization, and multi-platform distribution, Quinta’s 280 reviews with an average 4.8/5 rating strongly support its choice.

If your team’s priority is providing immediate, personable support through live chat, email, or social media, re:amaze is the right pick. Despite lacking review data and a smaller footprint, re:amaze offers strong integrations for support automation in online stores and apps. Its focus on customer service automation and real-time monitoring makes it ideal for hotels that need to handle high guest inquiry volumes efficiently.

Is Quinta or re:amaze Easier to Use?

Quinta scores a 4.74/5 for ease of use and has 280 reviews, many praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users report that staff find the platform easy to adopt, with some highlighting the quick setup and smooth data management. Support from Quinta is rated at 4.82/5, and recent reviews emphasize how simple it is to implement and operate.

re:amaze, by contrast, has no review ratings available, which makes it impossible to assess its user friendliness definitively. Given its focus on live chat and messaging for websites, its interface is typically designed for quick deployment but lacks publicly available feedback on usability. Edge: Quinta.

Which Has Better Features: Quinta or re:amaze?

Quinta offers a comprehensive suite of 53 features tailored for hotels, including chatbot booking agents, automated replies, message routing, real-time inventory, multi-channel integrations (WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger), digital check-in, guest review campaigns, and extensive customization options. It also features advanced data management tools like behavior analysis, NLP, and room suggestions, which re:amaze does not provide.

re:amaze, in comparison, offers no publicly listed features beyond basic chat and messaging functionalities. Its strength lies in integration with e-commerce platforms, surveys, and automation for customer support, but it lacks the specialized hotel-centric features Quinta provides. Edge: Quinta.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Quinta or re:amaze?

Quinta’s customer support ratings are impressive, at 4.82/5, with recent reviews praising swift, knowledgeable assistance during onboarding and ongoing support. Users mention the support team’s proactive approach and quick resolution of issues, which enhances overall satisfaction.

re:amaze lacks publicly available review data for support quality, but as a smaller platform, it is generally known for its straightforward onboarding and responsive support. However, without recent reviews, Quinta’s support reputation is the clear standout. Edge: Quinta.

Which Has More Integrations: Quinta or re:amaze?

Quinta boasts 51 verified integration partners, including major hotel systems like Omnibees, Hotelkit, and RoomRaccoon, as well as global platforms such as Google, Facebook Messenger, and WhatsApp. Its extensive partner network simplifies embedding its platform into existing hotel operations.

re:amaze, on the other hand, has no verified integrations listed, primarily serving websites and e-commerce platforms with popular third-party app integrations like Shopify and MailChimp. For hotels seeking a deeply integrated, hotel-specific ecosystem, Quinta’s broader partner network offers a significant advantage. Edge: Quinta.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Quinta or re:amaze?

Quinta earns an impressive overall rating of 4.8/5 based on 280 reviews, with recent feedback in the last six months reinforcing its strong performance. Hotels across segments, especially boutique, city center, and resort properties, consistently praise its ease of use, support, and ROI.

re:amaze lacks available review data, making it impossible to determine how hotels perceive it. Given Quinta’s substantial recent review volume and high ratings, it’s clear that hoteliers rate Quinta more favorably. Edge: Quinta.

How Much Do Quinta and re:amaze Cost?

Quinta’s pricing starts at $200 per month with no free tier or trial, making it a predictable investment. re:amaze’s pricing details are not publicly available, but it is typically a subscription-based SaaS with tiered pricing depending on channels and features.

Since re:amaze does not openly disclose prices or trial options, Quinta’s transparent pricing provides a clearer picture of potential costs. For budget-conscious hotels or those seeking predictable expenses, Quinta’s straightforward model is advantageous.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Quinta?

  • Hotels that want to structure and distribute hotel data across multiple channels.
  • Hotels aiming to increase direct bookings through AI engagement.
  • Properties with a focus on integrating data-driven marketing and sales campaigns.
  • Hotels seeking multi-channel guest communication (WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger).
  • Teams comfortable with structured data management and AI tools.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel relies solely on live chat support without a focus on data structuring.
  • You prefer a platform designed solely for customer support rather than data management.
  • Your team lacks technical resources for data integration.

What Type of Hotel Should Use re:amaze?

  • Hotels prioritizing real-time live chat and messaging support.
  • Properties seeking a centralized platform for communication via social media, email, and SMS.
  • Teams that need to monitor guest interactions in real time and automate responses.
  • Hotels that want a simple, quick-to-deploy support system.
  • Businesses looking for third-party integrations with e-commerce and marketing tools.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel’s core goal is AI-driven bookings based on structured hotel data.
  • You need hotel-specific features like booking engines or room suggestions.
  • Your operation is heavily data-centric without a focus on live guest support.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Quinta is fundamentally a hotel data management platform that enables AI systems like Velma to drive direct bookings and marketing. Its strength lies in structuring, distributing, and activating hotel data in an AI-enabled environment, making it ideal for properties focused on increasing revenue via technological sophistication.

re:amaze functions as a customer support platform designed for websites, apps, and online stores, excelling at live chat, email support, and social media automation. It’s best suited for hotels that want to handle high volumes of guest inquiries across multiple channels, with minimal focus on hotel data or AI-driven marketing.

If your hotel’s primary goal is to boost direct bookings through structured data and AI engagement, Quinta is the clear choice. For high-volume, multi-channel guest communication and support, re:amaze offers a straightforward, support-centric solution.

In terms of overall hotel-centric utility and recent reviews, Quinta’s 4.8/5 rating with over 280 reviews makes it the stronger candidate. Its extensive features, integrations, and proven support set it apart, especially for hotels aiming to modernize their data infrastructure and engagement strategies.

Final recommendation: For hotels looking to leverage structured data for AI and direct bookings, choose Quinta by Quinta. If your focus is on reactive, multi-channel guest support, consider re:amaze.

How Much Do Quinta and re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging) Cost?

Hotel Chatbots pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.

Quinta Quinta re:amaze re:amaze
Starting Price From $200/mo

Which Features Does Quinta Have That re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging) Doesn't (and Vice Versa)?

According to HTR's product database, Quinta and re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.

Feature Quinta Quinta re:amaze re:amaze
Automated Replies
Chatbot Booking Agent
Facebook Messenger Integration
Message Routing
Mobile App
Whatsapp Integration

Showing top differences. 41 more features differ between these products.

Real-World Results: Quinta vs re:amaze by Business Goal

We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.

Increase Operational Efficiency
Quinta Palladium Hotel Group Mid-Size
+ Velma handled inquiries across a vast spectrum of over 1,600 data points, encompassing various topics including, among others, contacting staff, rate plans and upgrades, on-site restaurant information, special offers, gift boxes, and coupons.
+ Revenue exceeding 1 million euros was generated from over 16,000 leads, whether they were converted automatically or with staff assistance.
+ The reduction of calls categorized as non-commercial has decreased from 35% to approximately 23%, resulting in a significant alleviation of the administrative workload.

"I believe that the key to artificial intelligence assistants lies not only in the robustness of the algorithms with which they are trained and developed, but also in the quality of..."

Toni Andújar
Toni Andújar
Corporate Digital & MadTech Director
re:amaze re:amaze

No published case study for this goal yet.

Quinta vs re:amaze: The Bottom Line

Quinta
Quinta
4.7/5 from 364 reviews

What hoteliers love

Customer Experience Improvement 99% positive

Quicktext significantly improves the overall customer experience by providing quick, accurate responses to inquiries and simplifying the booking proce... Quicktext significantly improves the overall customer experience by providing quick, accurate responses to inquiries and simplifying the booking process. The immediacy of the chatbot's responses elevates guest satisfaction and engagement. The tool's ability to handle common inquiries swiftly enables staff to allocate more time to personalized service, thereby enhancing the guest experience even further.

Automation of Guest Communication 95% positive

Quicktext effectively automates responses to frequent guest queries, significantly reducing workload for front desk staff and enhancing guest satisfac... Quicktext effectively automates responses to frequent guest queries, significantly reducing workload for front desk staff and enhancing guest satisfaction. This automation allows staff to focus on more complex tasks and strategic activities, ultimately leading to increased efficiency and productivity. The tool provides instant responses, improving the overall guest experience and making the booking process smoother.

Customization Capabilities 71% positive

Users praise Quicktext for its high level of customization, allowing them to tailor responses and dialogues according to specific brand requirements.... Users praise Quicktext for its high level of customization, allowing them to tailor responses and dialogues according to specific brand requirements. This flexibility enhances the guest experience by making interactions feel more personalized. Users can configure the chatbot to address unique queries specific to their hotel, creating a custom fit that serves their business needs effectively.

Where hoteliers push back

Challenges with Handling Complex Queries 87% negative

While Quicktext excels in managing routine inquiries, it sometimes struggles with more complex questions or queries involving multiple issues. Custome... While Quicktext excels in managing routine inquiries, it sometimes struggles with more complex questions or queries involving multiple issues. Customers have highlighted the need for improvements in the chatbot's capability to handle such scenarios, suggesting more sophisticated AI and better integration with human agents when required.

Unique capabilities

Mobile App Facebook Messenger Integration Chatbot Booking Agent Whatsapp Integration Automated Replies
4.7/5 ease of use 4.8/5 support 51 integrations
Visit Profile
re:amaze
re:amaze
0.0/5 from 0 reviews
0.0/5 ease of use 0.0/5 support 0 integrations
Visit Profile

Where the ratings diverge most

Overall Rating Quinta 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
Ease of Use Quinta 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
Customer Support Quinta 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
Value for Money Quinta 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
Onboarding Quinta 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

Frequently Asked Questions About Quinta vs re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging)

Can Quinta replace re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging)?

It depends on your requirements. Quinta and re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging) share many core Hotel Chatbots features, but each has unique capabilities. Quinta offers 51 verified integration partners, while re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.

Which is better for small or independent hotels?

Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Quinta leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.

Do Quinta or re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging) offer a free plan?

Quinta: No. re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Chatbots vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.

How Does HTR Evaluate and Rank Quinta and re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging)?

The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Quinta has an HT Score of 84 and re:amaze has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.

Criteria Group Weight What It Measures
Customer Ratings & Reviews

How highly do users recommend this product?

Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories

The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias.

Partner Ecosystem

How highly do tech partners recommend this company?

Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality

Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack.

Customer Centricity

How customer-centric is this organization?

Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness

Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features.

Reach, Staying Power & Resources

How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing?

Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score

Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity.

Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →

Get personalized product recommendations

Product recommendations advisor

Ghostel icon

Let´s lookup your hotel information