The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 364 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Quinta shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Mobile App.
re:amaze shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 364 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 364 | 0 |
After analyzing 364 verified reviews, Quinta users most value its customer experience improvement, automation of guest communication, customization capabilities, while re:amaze users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Experience Improvement
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation of Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Booking Engines and Other Tools
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Challenges with Handling Complex Queries
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Chatbots vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 82 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 181 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #2 54 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #2 27 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 168 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 117 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #3 89 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 29 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #5 29 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 237 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #5 9 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #1 15 reviews | — |
Choosing between Quinta by Quinta and re:amaze for your hotel’s chatbot needs hinges on what your team prioritizes. Quinta offers a data-driven, AI-powered engagement platform that structures hotel data for AI systems and enhances direct bookings. Conversely, re:amaze functions as a customer support platform emphasizing live chat, multi-channel messaging, and automation for websites and apps.
Both products aim to improve guest communication, but Quinta is built specifically for the hospitality industry’s data management and AI integration, while re:amaze excels in real-time, multi-channel support. Which aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?
Quinta primarily addresses the challenge of making hotel data accessible and useful in an AI-driven booking environment. Its core strength lies in collecting, structuring, and distributing hotel data across platforms, enabling Velma to engage travelers actively and convert leads into bookings. re:amaze, on the other hand, is designed for centralized customer support through live chat and messaging, focusing on resolving guest inquiries efficiently and increasing satisfaction.
The difference is clear: Quinta turns hotel data into a strategic asset for AI and bookings, whereas re:amaze is optimized for handling guest conversations across channels in real time. If your goal is to leverage structured data for AI-driven marketing and booking, Quinta is the better fit. If you need a support system for handling live visitor questions and automating customer service, re:amaze is more suited.
If your hotel needs to enhance direct booking rates through intelligent data management and AI engagement, go with Quinta. Its ability to structure and distribute structured hotel data makes Velma a highly effective conversion tool, especially given its high reviews and recent positive feedback. For hotels with a focus on data accuracy, AI-driven personalization, and multi-platform distribution, Quinta’s 280 reviews with an average 4.8/5 rating strongly support its choice.
If your team’s priority is providing immediate, personable support through live chat, email, or social media, re:amaze is the right pick. Despite lacking review data and a smaller footprint, re:amaze offers strong integrations for support automation in online stores and apps. Its focus on customer service automation and real-time monitoring makes it ideal for hotels that need to handle high guest inquiry volumes efficiently.
Quinta scores a 4.74/5 for ease of use and has 280 reviews, many praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users report that staff find the platform easy to adopt, with some highlighting the quick setup and smooth data management. Support from Quinta is rated at 4.82/5, and recent reviews emphasize how simple it is to implement and operate.
re:amaze, by contrast, has no review ratings available, which makes it impossible to assess its user friendliness definitively. Given its focus on live chat and messaging for websites, its interface is typically designed for quick deployment but lacks publicly available feedback on usability. Edge: Quinta.
Quinta offers a comprehensive suite of 53 features tailored for hotels, including chatbot booking agents, automated replies, message routing, real-time inventory, multi-channel integrations (WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger), digital check-in, guest review campaigns, and extensive customization options. It also features advanced data management tools like behavior analysis, NLP, and room suggestions, which re:amaze does not provide.
re:amaze, in comparison, offers no publicly listed features beyond basic chat and messaging functionalities. Its strength lies in integration with e-commerce platforms, surveys, and automation for customer support, but it lacks the specialized hotel-centric features Quinta provides. Edge: Quinta.
Quinta’s customer support ratings are impressive, at 4.82/5, with recent reviews praising swift, knowledgeable assistance during onboarding and ongoing support. Users mention the support team’s proactive approach and quick resolution of issues, which enhances overall satisfaction.
re:amaze lacks publicly available review data for support quality, but as a smaller platform, it is generally known for its straightforward onboarding and responsive support. However, without recent reviews, Quinta’s support reputation is the clear standout. Edge: Quinta.
Quinta boasts 51 verified integration partners, including major hotel systems like Omnibees, Hotelkit, and RoomRaccoon, as well as global platforms such as Google, Facebook Messenger, and WhatsApp. Its extensive partner network simplifies embedding its platform into existing hotel operations.
re:amaze, on the other hand, has no verified integrations listed, primarily serving websites and e-commerce platforms with popular third-party app integrations like Shopify and MailChimp. For hotels seeking a deeply integrated, hotel-specific ecosystem, Quinta’s broader partner network offers a significant advantage. Edge: Quinta.
Quinta earns an impressive overall rating of 4.8/5 based on 280 reviews, with recent feedback in the last six months reinforcing its strong performance. Hotels across segments, especially boutique, city center, and resort properties, consistently praise its ease of use, support, and ROI.
re:amaze lacks available review data, making it impossible to determine how hotels perceive it. Given Quinta’s substantial recent review volume and high ratings, it’s clear that hoteliers rate Quinta more favorably. Edge: Quinta.
Quinta’s pricing starts at $200 per month with no free tier or trial, making it a predictable investment. re:amaze’s pricing details are not publicly available, but it is typically a subscription-based SaaS with tiered pricing depending on channels and features.
Since re:amaze does not openly disclose prices or trial options, Quinta’s transparent pricing provides a clearer picture of potential costs. For budget-conscious hotels or those seeking predictable expenses, Quinta’s straightforward model is advantageous.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Quinta is fundamentally a hotel data management platform that enables AI systems like Velma to drive direct bookings and marketing. Its strength lies in structuring, distributing, and activating hotel data in an AI-enabled environment, making it ideal for properties focused on increasing revenue via technological sophistication.
re:amaze functions as a customer support platform designed for websites, apps, and online stores, excelling at live chat, email support, and social media automation. It’s best suited for hotels that want to handle high volumes of guest inquiries across multiple channels, with minimal focus on hotel data or AI-driven marketing.
If your hotel’s primary goal is to boost direct bookings through structured data and AI engagement, Quinta is the clear choice. For high-volume, multi-channel guest communication and support, re:amaze offers a straightforward, support-centric solution.
In terms of overall hotel-centric utility and recent reviews, Quinta’s 4.8/5 rating with over 280 reviews makes it the stronger candidate. Its extensive features, integrations, and proven support set it apart, especially for hotels aiming to modernize their data infrastructure and engagement strategies.
Final recommendation: For hotels looking to leverage structured data for AI and direct bookings, choose Quinta by Quinta. If your focus is on reactive, multi-channel guest support, consider re:amaze.
According to HTR's product database, Quinta and re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot Booking Agent | ||
| Facebook Messenger Integration | ||
| Message Routing | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Whatsapp Integration |
Showing top differences. 41 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I believe that the key to artificial intelligence assistants lies not only in the robustness of the algorithms with which they are trained and developed, but also in the quality of..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Quicktext significantly improves the overall customer experience by providing quick, accurate responses to inquiries and simplifying the booking proce... Quicktext significantly improves the overall customer experience by providing quick, accurate responses to inquiries and simplifying the booking process. The immediacy of the chatbot's responses elevates guest satisfaction and engagement. The tool's ability to handle common inquiries swiftly enables staff to allocate more time to personalized service, thereby enhancing the guest experience even further.
Quicktext effectively automates responses to frequent guest queries, significantly reducing workload for front desk staff and enhancing guest satisfac... Quicktext effectively automates responses to frequent guest queries, significantly reducing workload for front desk staff and enhancing guest satisfaction. This automation allows staff to focus on more complex tasks and strategic activities, ultimately leading to increased efficiency and productivity. The tool provides instant responses, improving the overall guest experience and making the booking process smoother.
Users praise Quicktext for its high level of customization, allowing them to tailor responses and dialogues according to specific brand requirements.... Users praise Quicktext for its high level of customization, allowing them to tailor responses and dialogues according to specific brand requirements. This flexibility enhances the guest experience by making interactions feel more personalized. Users can configure the chatbot to address unique queries specific to their hotel, creating a custom fit that serves their business needs effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While Quicktext excels in managing routine inquiries, it sometimes struggles with more complex questions or queries involving multiple issues. Custome... While Quicktext excels in managing routine inquiries, it sometimes struggles with more complex questions or queries involving multiple issues. Customers have highlighted the need for improvements in the chatbot's capability to handle such scenarios, suggesting more sophisticated AI and better integration with human agents when required.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Quinta and re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging) share many core Hotel Chatbots features, but each has unique capabilities. Quinta offers 51 verified integration partners, while re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Quinta leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Quinta: No. re:amaze (Live Chat+Messaging): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Chatbots vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Quinta has an HT Score of 84 and re:amaze has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor