The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 56 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Travel Tripper shines .
SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Reporting Dashboard and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 56 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 56 |
After analyzing 56 verified reviews, Travel Tripper users most value its , while SHR Group users highlight personalized customer success support, user-friendly interface, integration with third-party systems. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Travel Tripper |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Personalized Customer Success Support
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
AI-Driven Booking Engine
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Extensive Reporting Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Cloud-Based System
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Travel Tripper |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 28 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 11 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #5 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Travel Tripper |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 34 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #5 18 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #7 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Travel Tripper |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 34 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 18 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #7 1 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #6 2 reviews |
Choosing between RezTrip by Travel Tripper and SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. RezTrip is a booking engine designed to boost direct bookings through personalization and dynamic pricing. Meanwhile, SHR CRS offers a comprehensive distribution management platform, integrating multiple channels and automating inventory updates across platforms. Both aim to improve revenue, but they approach the challenge differently. So, which solution aligns best with your hotel’s operational goals?
RezTrip’s primary focus is on enhancing your hotel’s direct booking capabilities by offering a user-friendly booking engine that integrates with your existing systems. SHR CRS, on the other hand, manages your entire distribution ecosystem, coordinating OTA channels, GDS, and direct bookings through a centralized platform. Since RezTrip is tailored toward increasing direct reservations, it’s ideal for properties prioritizing direct sales. SHR CRS excels at streamlining multi-channel distribution and revenue management, making it suitable for hotels with complex distribution needs. Are you mainly looking to boost direct bookings or optimize channel management?
If your hotel needs to focus on increasing direct reservations and personalized online experiences, RezTrip is the better pick. It offers a straightforward interface, easy integrations, and tools to set up promotions and analyze customer data—all within a dedicated booking engine. Conversely, if your hotel requires centralized control over distribution channels, real-time rate updates, and revenue management features, SHR CRS is the clear choice. It supports multi-property management and boasts a broader feature set designed for complex operations. Your decision should reflect whether your focus is on direct booking growth or distribution control.
RezTrip’s interface is designed for simplicity, allowing your team to quickly set up and manage bookings without extensive training. However, SHR CRS’s platform, supported by a 4.61/5 ease of use rating from users, is more feature-rich and may require a steeper learning curve but offers more comprehensive control. SHR’s onboarding process is rated highly, making adoption smoother for larger or multi-property hotels. Edge: SHR CRS.
RezTrip offers core booking engine functionalities like personalized experiences, dynamic pricing, and inventory management. SHR CRS, however, provides 20 unique features, including channel management, metasearch connectivity, PMS and RMS integrations, and content management—capabilities RezTrip lacks. SHR’s extensive feature set allows for deeper distribution control and operational automation. The clear edge goes to SHR CRS for its broader range of hotel management features.
RezTrip’s support details are sparse, but SHR CRS’s support ratings are outstanding at 4.76/5, with reviews praising their prompt, dedicated service. Hoteliers describe SHR’s support as “top notch,” often noting their proactive assistance during onboarding and operations. Review recency indicates ongoing high support levels. Edge: SHR CRS.
RezTrip does not list verified integrations, implying limited connectivity options. SHR CRS boasts 81 verified partners, including PMS, CRMs, RMS, and third-party systems like Criton and Profitroom. This extensive integration network allows you to connect your existing hotel tech stack efficiently. For a hotel seeking seamless, broad connectivity, SHR CRS is the superior choice.
RezTrip has no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. SHR CRS, however, has 49 reviews in the last six months and an overall rating of 4.77/5, with a 93% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers of all property types—particularly boutique hotels, resorts, and casinos—rate SHR highly for their support and feature depth. Clearly, SHR CRS’s recent and extensive reviews give it the edge in reputation.
Pricing details are unavailable for RezTrip, suggesting potential custom quotes or a less transparent model. SHR CRS does not list specific fees but emphasizes there’s no freemium or per-room charges, indicating a likely subscription model. Consider your budget and the value of the features you need when evaluating cost.
The core difference lies in scope: RezTrip is a booking engine that targets direct online reservations, while SHR CRS provides a full-scale distribution and revenue management platform. If your hotel’s main goal is to drive direct bookings with a simple interface, RezTrip is suitable. But if you need to manage multiple channels, automate inventory, and leverage detailed data, SHR CRS is the more comprehensive choice.
Choosing RezTrip makes sense if your team prioritizes a straightforward, easy-to-use booking engine focused on conversions. Its limited feature set and lack of recent reviews suggest it’s better suited for small, independent hotels with minimal distribution complexity. SHR CRS, by contrast, is ideal for larger or multi-property hotels that need robust, integrated systems and support.
In summary, for hotels seeking a highly-rated, well-supported, and feature-rich distribution system, SHR CRS is the clear winner. If your focus is on increasing direct bookings with a simple platform, RezTrip might suffice, but its limited recent data makes it less compelling.
This comprehensive comparison should guide your decision based on your hotel’s size, distribution complexity, and strategic priorities. Both products have their strengths, but SHR CRS’s recent reviews, extensive features, and high hotel ratings position it as the stronger option for most hotels today.
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Travel Tripper |
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, RezTrip and SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Travel Tripper |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking engine | ||
| Call center functionality | ||
| Channel management & OTA distribution | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| Reporting Dashboard |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
SHR's customer success team is often highlighted as outstanding, providing proactive and tailored support. This level of service helps in both everyda... SHR's customer success team is often highlighted as outstanding, providing proactive and tailored support. This level of service helps in both everyday inquiries and major projects, significantly easing the management of hotel operations.
SHR's systems, particularly CRS and CRO, are frequently described as user-friendly and easy to navigate. This ease of use contributes to efficient ope... SHR's systems, particularly CRS and CRO, are frequently described as user-friendly and easy to navigate. This ease of use contributes to efficient operations and quicker onboarding of new users.
The ability to seamlessly integrate with third-party systems like PMS and other hotel management tools is a strong point for SHR. Users find this inte... The ability to seamlessly integrate with third-party systems like PMS and other hotel management tools is a strong point for SHR. Users find this integral for smooth operations and efficient management.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews mention the need for more extensive and user-friendly reporting options within SHR's systems. This includes ad-hoc analysis capabiliti... Several reviews mention the need for more extensive and user-friendly reporting options within SHR's systems. This includes ad-hoc analysis capabilities and more detailed insight into key metrics.
A few users express a desire for a more fully cloud-based experience to minimize downtime during upgrades. This would align SHR with modern technology... A few users express a desire for a more fully cloud-based experience to minimize downtime during upgrades. This would align SHR with modern technology trends and enhance system availability.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. RezTrip and SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. RezTrip offers 0 verified integration partners, while SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) offers 81. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RezTrip: No. SHR Central Reservation System (CRS): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Travel Tripper has an HT Score of 0 and SHR Group has 49. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor