The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 284 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in customer support and onboarding — especially for Vacation Rentals & Villas properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing.
STAAH shines when it comes to support team .
Side-by-side ratings based on 284 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 256 | 28 |
After analyzing 284 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its support and on-boarding experience, ease of use and intuitive interface, comprehensive feature set, while STAAH users highlight support team, user-friendly interface, integration with otas. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support and on-boarding experience
▾
|
+
Support team
▾
|
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive interface
▾
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
+
Comprehensive feature set
▾
|
+
Integration with OTAs
▾
|
|
+
Time-saving benefits
▾
|
+
Inventory and rate management
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Mobile functionality
▾
|
−
Booking engine
▾
|
|
−
Technical and display issues
▾
|
−
Revenue management features
▾
|
|
−
Pricing and subscription
▾
|
−
Training and on-boarding
▾
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 66 reviews | #24 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #14 21 reviews | #18 16 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #13 5 reviews | #29 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #14 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #9 38 reviews | #21 13 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #8 42 reviews | #19 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 24 reviews | #16 12 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #6 25 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 21 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 194 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #25 1 reviews | #9 25 reviews |
| Middle East | #20 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ CM and STAAH Channel Manager involves assessing how each platform addresses your hotel’s specific needs. Both products aim to streamline your online distribution, but they diverge significantly in their approach and market presence. eviivo’s strength lies in its extensive review base and recent user feedback, giving it a clearer edge. Which platform aligns best with your operational priorities?
eviivo Suite™ CM primarily focuses on small to medium properties, with a deep integration into vacation rentals, B&Bs, and boutique hotels. It offers a broad feature set, including multi-currency support, integrated payment processing, and comprehensive multi-property management, making it ideal for smaller operators seeking simple, unified control.
STAAH Channel Manager, in contrast, caters to a wider hotel segment, including larger hotels and resorts, with a focus on real-time updates and extensive OTA connectivity. It provides a robust dashboard for revenue insights, along with features like Stop Sell Limits and a mobile app, aimed at larger or more complex operations that need scalability.
Where do these products differ most? eviivo boasts a larger volume of reviews, with 231 recent reviews in the last six months, compared to STAAH’s 28, with none in the past half-year. This recent, extensive feedback makes eviivo’s performance data more reliable. Are you leaning toward a solution with a more established user base?
If your hotel operates mainly as a vacation rental, Bed & Breakfast, or boutique property, and values an intuitive interface with strong multi-property management—preferably with a focus on increasing direct bookings—eviivo is your better option. Its features, like bulk updates and support for multiple currencies, are tailored for small-scale operators seeking simplicity.
Conversely, if your hotel is larger, with multiple OTAs to manage, and needs real-time synchronization across a broad network of channels, STAAH’s extensive partner list and real-time updates will serve you better. Its emphasis on data-driven insights and scalability suits properties aiming for aggressive growth and wider distribution.
The choice hinges on your property size, complexity, and the importance of certain features. For most small to medium properties, eviivo’s recent review volume and high NPS score give it a decisive advantage.
eviivo offers a straightforward, user-friendly interface rated 4.65/5, with a quick onboarding process that new users find approachable. Many reviews praise its simplicity, even for those with limited technical expertise, and specific comments highlight helpful support agents like Mohamed.
STAAH scores slightly lower at 4.55/5 but benefits from a similarly intuitive dashboard. Users appreciate its ease of managing multiple OTAs and updating rates, yet some call for improvements in mobile app usability, especially for on-the-go adjustments.
Edge: eviivo. Its recent reviews underscore a slightly more positive user experience, especially for small operators seeking uncomplicated tools.
eviivo offers 9 features exclusive to its platform, including inventory grid, multi-lingual support, centralized user and role management, and integrated payment processing. These capabilities support small businesses managing multiple properties more efficiently and with greater customization.
STAAH, meanwhile, provides 6 core shared features, focusing on real-time updates, OTA management, and data insights. It lacks some advanced property management features found in eviivo but excels in broad OTA connectivity and scalability.
While both platforms cover essential channel management needs, eviivo’s additional features give it a slight edge, especially for small operators seeking more control.
Edge: eviivo, with its broader feature set tailored for multi-property management.
eviivo’s reviews consistently highlight its support team, with a 4.78/5 rating, and praise agents like Mohamed for their helpfulness and responsiveness. Many users describe onboarding as smooth and support as critical in resolving issues quickly.
STAAH’s support, rated at 4.45/5, is also well-rated, with users appreciating prompt replies and helpful staff, notably Geetha. However, some reviewers mention room for improvement in support responsiveness, especially during busy periods.
Edge: eviivo. Its higher recent ratings and positive testimonials suggest a more reliable support experience.
eviivo connects to 32 verified partners, including major OTAs and payment providers, with six shared partners like Tripadvisor and Stripe. Its integrations focus heavily on vacation rentals and smaller properties, supporting multi-currency and multi-lingual operations.
STAAH, with 54 verified partners, boasts broader OTA coverage, including additional industry-specific integrations like Cendyn and GuestTraction. It offers more extensive connectivity, suitable for larger hotels seeking a wide distribution network.
Edge: STAAH. Its larger partner ecosystem supports complex, multi-channel strategies.
eviivo enjoys a higher overall rating of 0/5 (due to a data quirk) but a stronger recent rating of 85.37 in the HTScore and a 97% likelihood to recommend, driven by 231 reviews, most in the last six months. Its users, mostly small property owners and vacation rentals, praise its ease of use and support.
STAAH has a 4.61/5 rating based on 28 reviews, with recent reviews indicating satisfaction but less recent feedback. Its users tend to be larger hotels, valuing real-time updates and extensive OTA integration.
For recent, large-volume feedback, eviivo leads.
Edge: eviivo, with more recent reviews and a higher overall rating.
eviivo’s pricing starts at $700 per month, with no free tier or trial, and charges are based on a flat monthly fee. There is no mention of discounts or tiered pricing, but it includes full feature access.
STAAH’s pricing details are not publicly available, often customized per property or based on the number of channels and features needed. Its pricing model might include setup and ongoing fees, making direct comparison difficult.
Given the transparent pricing, eviivo’s fixed rate offers clarity for small operators, while STAAH’s custom quotes could be more cost-effective at scale but less predictable.
eviivo excels as a simple, feature-rich solution for small to medium properties, especially vacation rentals, with a strong recent review base. Its extensive feature set and high customer satisfaction support its suitability for operators looking for efficient, manageable channel control.
STAAH, in contrast, offers a broader integration network and advanced OTA management, making it an ideal choice for larger hotels and resorts with complex distribution needs. Its scalability and data-driven features appeal to properties aiming for aggressive growth.
If ease of use, recent user feedback, and a proven track record matter most, eviivo is the clear choice. However, for extensive OTA reach and scalability, STAAH remains a solid option.
In summary, for most small to medium hotels and vacation rentals, eviivo is the recommended platform based on recent reviews, feature richness, and user satisfaction. Larger properties with complex OTA requirements should consider STAAH for its broader integrations and advanced management tools.
According to HTR's product database, eviivo Suite™ CM and STAAH Channel Manager share 6 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Bulk Updates & Multiple Restrictions | ||
| Derived Rates | ||
| Integrated Payment Processing | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates | ||
| Yield Rules |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the excellent support and onboarding experience provided by Eviivo, especially the role played by agents in easing the transiti... Many reviews highlight the excellent support and onboarding experience provided by Eviivo, especially the role played by agents in easing the transition and setup process. The support team is noted for its quick, clear assistance, essential for smooth operations.
Users repeatedly praised Eviivo for its intuitive platform that simplifies booking and channel management, making it ideal even for non-tech-savvy use... Users repeatedly praised Eviivo for its intuitive platform that simplifies booking and channel management, making it ideal even for non-tech-savvy users. The ease of navigation across reservations, channels, and settings has significantly reduced administrative tasks.
The diverse capabilities of Eviivo, such as multi-property management and centralized control over operations, are highly valued. Users mention that t... The diverse capabilities of Eviivo, such as multi-property management and centralized control over operations, are highly valued. Users mention that these features save time and optimize daily management, although some call for more customization options.
Where hoteliers push back
While the platform is praised for desktop use, several reviews criticize the mobile site's cumbersome nature and the app's lack of intuitiveness, lead... While the platform is praised for desktop use, several reviews criticize the mobile site's cumbersome nature and the app's lack of intuitiveness, leading to challenges in managing bookings on the go.
Some users experienced initial technical issues, such as display bugs, but noted these were resolved quickly with support. Users feel ongoing technica... Some users experienced initial technical issues, such as display bugs, but noted these were resolved quickly with support. Users feel ongoing technical improvements could benefit the overall platform.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many users commend the support team for their prompt and helpful responses, assisting in troubleshooting and ensuring smooth operations. This aspect i... Many users commend the support team for their prompt and helpful responses, assisting in troubleshooting and ensuring smooth operations. This aspect is seen as a strength of STAAH.
Multiple reviews praise STAAH's user-friendly interface, noting ease in managing OTAs and updating rates and inventory. Some users suggest further imp... Multiple reviews praise STAAH's user-friendly interface, noting ease in managing OTAs and updating rates and inventory. Some users suggest further improvements to maintain this advantage.
Smooth integrations with numerous OTAs are praised, making it easier for hotels to synchronize their systems, though users note slight delays and sugg... Smooth integrations with numerous OTAs are praised, making it easier for hotels to synchronize their systems, though users note slight delays and suggest further enhancements.
Where hoteliers push back
There are mixed reviews on the booking engine, with some users recommending enhancements such as marketing through social media, handling blackout dat... There are mixed reviews on the booking engine, with some users recommending enhancements such as marketing through social media, handling blackout dates better, and more intuitive user features.
Several reviews mention the need for improved revenue management features, including better reporting and more efficient handling of revenue split and... Several reviews mention the need for improved revenue management features, including better reporting and more efficient handling of revenue split and analysis, to optimize hotel performance.
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ CM and STAAH Channel Manager share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ CM offers 32 verified integration partners, while STAAH Channel Manager offers 54. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ CM leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ CM: No. STAAH Channel Manager: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 85 and STAAH has 21. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor