The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Trust Payments shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 69 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 69 | 0 |
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, ROH users most value its automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support, while Trust Payments users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Trust Payments |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Trust Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #3 2 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 13 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #2 21 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #2 25 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Trust Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 31 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 34 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 28 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #3 4 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Trust Payments |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 61 reviews | — |
| Europe | #3 1 reviews | — |
Both ROH by ROH and Trust Payments aim to streamline payment processes in the hospitality industry, but they serve very different needs and contexts. ROH offers a hotel-specific payments platform with extensive features built for property-level management, while Trust Payments functions as a general-purpose payment processor suited for diverse business sectors. The key question is: which one aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
ROH is a specialized solution with a proven track record among hotels, especially in North America and Europe, while Trust Payments lacks recent reviews and a dedicated hotel focus. Which product truly fits your hotel’s scale and needs?
ROH by ROH is clearly the more established choice for hotels, evidenced by its 65 reviews and a perfect 100 score on HotelTechReport. Its focus on hospitality-specific features like refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, and recurring payments sets it apart from Trust Payments, which doesn’t offer comparable hotel-centric functionalities.
Trust Payments, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or hotel-specific features listed, making it less relevant for hotel operations today. The absence of hotel-focused features and lack of updated customer feedback suggest it isn’t a strong contender for your property. So, which platform truly addresses your hotel’s payment needs?
If your hotel needs a payments platform that integrates seamlessly with property management systems and offers advanced features like chargeback management, payment tokenization, and installment plans, go with ROH. Its 19 exclusive features demonstrate its tailored approach to hospitality payments, along with a robust integration with Oracle Hospitality.
If your hotel prioritizes versatility across multiple business types with a general payment processor that can handle e-commerce and in-store transactions, Trust Payments might seem appealing. However, without recent reviews or hotel-specific functionalities, it’s not as suited for hospitality as ROH.
ROH scores a remarkable 4.95 out of 5 for ease of use, with onboarding rated at 4.92 and customer support at 4.97. Users praise its intuitive interface, mentioning how new staff can learn it quickly and how it simplifies complex payment processes.
Trust Payments has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to assess its user-friendliness. Given ROH’s high ratings and positive user feedback, it’s clear that your team will find the platform straightforward and quick to adopt.
Edge: ROH.
ROH offers 19 features exclusive to its platform, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, pay-by-link, installment plans, and support for major card networks like Visa, Mastercard, and American Express. Its PCI compliance and chargeback management add layers of security and control.
Trust Payments does not list any unique features and appears to lack hotel-specific functionalities. Its offerings are more suited for general retail or e-commerce environments.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s customer support scores a near-perfect 4.97 out of 5, with reviews highlighting the support staff’s responsiveness and helpfulness. Users appreciate the onboarding process, with a 4.92 rating, and mention how support helps streamline implementation.
There are no recent reviews or ratings available for Trust Payments, which leaves its support quality unverified. Based on current data, ROH clearly leads in customer service.
Edge: ROH.
ROH integrates with Oracle Hospitality, and its verified partner network includes one other. Its integration capabilities are tailored to property management and hospitality systems, ensuring smoother operations.
Trust Payments has no verified integrations listed, limiting its appeal for hotels seeking seamless system connections. The lack of integrations is a significant disadvantage for hotel use.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s reviews are recent, with 10 in the last six months, and a 99% likelihood to recommend among users. Hoteliers from various segments, especially independent and resort properties, consistently praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Trust Payments has no recent reviews, and its overall rating remains at zero, indicating no current user satisfaction data for hotels. For hotel-specific feedback, ROH’s reviews are far more reliable.
Edge: ROH.
ROH charges a flat monthly fee of $100, with no implementation or trial fees, offering predictable costs. Trust Payments’ pricing is not publicly listed, making direct comparison impossible.
Given the transparent pricing structure and positive ROI ratings from current users, ROH provides a clear value proposition. The absence of pricing data for Trust Payments makes it difficult to evaluate its cost-effectiveness.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small, low-volume property that doesn’t require advanced payment features or integration.
Not ideal if your hotel needs hospitality-specific features, dedicated integrations, or recent reviews indicating satisfaction.
ROH is a hospitality-focused payments platform tailored for hotels, offering extensive features, integrations, and positive recent reviews. Its high support ratings and proven results, like recovering 90% of outstanding invoices in 60 days, demonstrate its effectiveness for property-level management.
Trust Payments, lacking recent hotel reviews, no listed hotel features, and no verified integrations, does not currently serve the specific needs of hotels well. If you prioritize a proven, hotel-centric solution, ROH is the clear choice.
Choose ROH for its deep industry focus, robust functionalities, and positive user feedback. Trust Payments may suit broader retail or e-commerce needs but falls short for hotel payment processing today.
Payments Processing Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Trust Payments | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, ROH and Trust Payments share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Trust Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Refund Management |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ROH and Trust Payments share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. ROH offers 1 verified integration partners, while Trust Payments offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ROH: No. Trust Payments: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ROH has an HT Score of 100 and Trust Payments has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor