The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Resumen
Analizamos 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros, comparamos funcionalidades, precios y casos de estudio reales para desglosar dónde destaca cada plataforma. La elección correcta depende de tu tipo de propiedad y prioridades:
Acigroup destaca .
Mews destaca en ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propiedades independent (4.9/5) , con funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Calificaciones comparadas basadas en 887 reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidad de recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidad de uso |
|
|
| Soporte al cliente |
|
|
| Relación calidad-precio |
|
|
| Precio inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Reseñas verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Tras analizar 887 reseñas verificadas, los usuarios de Acigroup valoran más su , mientras que los usuarios de Mews destacan ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Haz clic en cualquier tema para ver qué dicen los evaluadores.
| Acigroup |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Incorporación y soporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Informes y análisis
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Cómo se posiciona cada producto entre los proveedores de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades para diferentes tamaños de propiedad, tipos y regiones, basado en reseñas verificadas de hoteleros en cada segmento.
Por tamaño de hotel
| Segmento | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeño (10-24 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 329 reseñas |
| Mediano (25-74 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #1 397 reseñas |
| Grande (75-199 habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 45 reseñas |
| Extra grande (200+ habitaciones) ▾ | — | #3 49 reseñas |
Por tipo de propiedad
| Segmento | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reseñas |
| Lujo ▾ | — | #5 220 reseñas |
| Cadena / Marca ▾ | — | #2 170 reseñas |
| Estancia prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 reseñas |
Por región
| Segmento | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Norteamérica ▾ | — | #8 106 reseñas |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 reseñas |
| Asia Pacífico ▾ | — | #10 17 reseñas |
| Medio Oriente ▾ | — | #28 8 reseñas |
Choosing the right property management system is critical for your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both Acigrup PMS and Mews PMS aim to streamline operations, but their core differences are striking: Acigrup offers a less proven, less reviewed product, while Mews provides a highly rated, widely adopted platform with a robust ecosystem. With more recent reviews and a larger user base, Mews is clearly the more reliable choice. Are you ready to prioritize proven technology and extensive support?
Both systems address fundamental hotel management needs—reservations, check-ins, billing, and housekeeping—but they diverge sharply in maturity and feature depth. Acigrup PMS, with zero reviews and no recent user feedback, offers little transparency on its capabilities or scalability, leaving hoteliers in the dark about its true performance. Meanwhile, Mews PMS boasts over 750 recent reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, making its proven track record clear. Which system aligns with your need for stability and proven success?
Acigrup’s lack of recent data suggests it’s an untested option, whereas Mews leads with a comprehensive cloud-native platform supported by a vast ecosystem of integrations. Mews’s features include over 59 exclusive modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and digital ordering—none of which Acigrup currently offers or has demonstrated. Do you want a reliable platform with proven capabilities, or a product with little market validation?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record and extensive third-party integrations, go with Mews. Its customer base includes boutique, city-center, and hostel properties, with many praising its ease of automation and guest experience features. Conversely, if your hotel is a small, simple operation willing to risk unverified technology with no recent reviews, Acigrup might seem attractive, but its lack of support and functionality makes it less advisable.
Given that Mews has significantly more reviews—758 compared to none for Acigrup—and consistently high ratings, it’s the stronger choice for hotels seeking reliability, scalability, and ongoing innovation. Do you prefer investing in a platform with clear validation, or taking a gamble on an untested system?
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews from a diverse array of hotels, highlighting its modern interface and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers describe it as “intuitive,” “thoughtfully designed,” and “easy to adapt,” even for staff with limited tech experience. In contrast, Acigrup’s usability is untested, with no recent reviews, making it impossible to judge whether it will be simple for your team.
The Mews onboarding process is supported by detailed training and responsive support, which many users praise for minimizing ramp-up time. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a suite of 59 exclusive features including revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and an extensive marketplace of over 1,000 integrations, making it ideal for modern, tech-driven hotels. Acigrup, with no documented features or third-party integrations, provides no evidence of comparable capabilities. Its lack of data makes assessing its potential features impossible.
For hotels wanting a fully integrated, scalable system with advanced automation, Mews’s feature set is unmatched. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s customer support receives a 4.27/5 rating from over 98 recent reviews, with hoteliers praising their rapid response and helpful training. Many note that issues are addressed swiftly, and support is proactive in onboarding. Conversely, Acigrup’s support is unreviewed and unverified, with no recent feedback to suggest it can meet your hotel’s needs.
Given the importance of reliable support in technology adoption, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with 336 verified third-party partners—including channel managers, POS, revenue tools, and more—allowing for flexible customization. Acigrup has zero verified integrations documented, limiting its capability to adapt to your existing tech environment.
The extensive ecosystem of Mews ensures your hotel can scale and innovate without being locked into a siloed system. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5, based on 758 recent reviews, indicates strong user satisfaction across segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and city-center properties. Hotels frequently mention its ease of use, automation, and support as key strengths. Acigrup, with no reviews, offers no data on user satisfaction.
The recent positive feedback for Mews demonstrates its reliability and value in the field. Edge: Mews.
Acigrup’s pricing details are unavailable, and the system appears to be offered without clear pricing models, which raises concerns about transparency. Mews charges a fixed monthly fee of $900, with no implementation or additional fees, providing clear cost expectations.
Given the importance of predictable budgeting and ROI, Mews’s transparent pricing makes it easier to evaluate value. Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a mature, feature-rich platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, supported by recent reviews and a large ecosystem. Its extensive automation, integrations, and proven support make it the clear choice for hotels aiming for operational excellence today and scalability tomorrow.
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-reviewed, and continuously innovating PMS, choose Mews. Its vast ecosystem and user satisfaction ensure your investment will support growth, efficiency, and guest loyalty.
However, if your operation is very small, with minimal needs, and you’re comfortable risking support and future scalability, Acigrup could be considered. But without recent validation, it’s a gamble.
In conclusion, go with Mews for peace of mind, proven results, and a future-proof platform that adapts to your needs.
Los precios de Sistemas de gestión de propiedades rara vez son sencillos. Esto es lo que sabemos de los datos de precios públicos de cada proveedor. Solicita siempre un presupuesto personalizado para el tamaño de tu propiedad.
| Acigroup |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Según la base de datos de productos de HTR, Acigrup PMS y Mews PMS comparten 0 funcionalidades. Estas son las diferencias clave: funcionalidades que uno tiene y el otro no.
| Funcionalidad | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invitado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi moneda | ||
| Módulo de gestión de ingresos | ||
| Perfiles de invitados | ||
| Plurilingüe |
Mostrando las principales diferencias. 47 funcionalidades más difieren entre estos productos.
Analizamos 8 casos de estudio verificados para comparar lo que los hoteles realmente logran con cada plataforma en cuatro objetivos clave de negocio.
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aún no hay caso de estudio publicado para este objetivo.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Lo que les encanta a los hoteleros
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Donde los hoteleros objetan
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables... Si bien Mews ofrece sólidas funcionalidades de informes y análisis, varias reseñas mencionan la necesidad de funciones de informes más personalizables y flexibles. Los usuarios expresan su deseo de obtener información más detallada, especialmente en el análisis de reservas e ingresos.
Capacidades únicas
Donde más difieren las calificaciones
Depende de tus requerimientos. Acigrup PMS y Mews PMS comparten muchas funcionalidades principales de Property Management Systems, pero cada uno tiene capacidades únicas. Acigrup PMS ofrece 0 socios de integración verificados, mientras que Mews PMS ofrece 335. Revisa la comparativa de funcionalidades anterior para ver en qué difieren antes de cambiar.
Los hoteles pequeños deben priorizar la facilidad de uso y una incorporación rápida. Mews PMS lidera en facilidad de uso con 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Busca precios transparentes y una opción de prueba o demostración. Filtra las reseñas en la página de cada producto por tamaño de propiedad para conocer la opinión de hoteles como el tuyo.
Acigrup PMS: No. Mews PMS: No. Ninguno de los dos productos ofrece actualmente un nivel gratuito. La mayoría de los proveedores de Property Management Systems ofrecen demostraciones o pruebas. Solicita una de cada uno para evaluar antes de comprometerte.
El HT Score es un ranking compuesto que considera 4 grupos de criterios y más de una docena de variables para ayudar a los hoteleros a comparar objetivamente los productos de tecnología hotelera. Acigroup tiene un HT Score de 0 y Mews tiene 100. Así se calcula la puntuación.
| Grupo de criterios | Peso | Qué mide |
|---|---|---|
| Calificaciones y reseñas de clientes |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los usuarios este producto? Puntuación de calificaciones, Volumen de reseñas, Participación de voz, Profundidad de reseñas, Antigüedad de reseñas, Casos de éxito ▾ El factor con mayor ponderación. Analiza las calificaciones promedio de satisfacción (probabilidad de recomendar, facilidad de uso, soporte, ROI), el total de reseñas en relación con los competidores de la categoría, la antigüedad de las reseñas (al menos 20 reseñas en los últimos 6 meses) y la participación de voz entre clientes hoteleros únicos para detectar sesgo de selección. |
| Ecosistema de socios |
|
¿Qué tanto recomiendan los socios tecnológicos a esta empresa? Recomendaciones de socios, Cantidad de integraciones, Calidad de integraciones ▾ Evalúa las recomendaciones de socios como votos de confianza de expertos, la cantidad de integraciones verificadas y la calidad del ecosistema, es decir, el promedio de HT Scores de los socios de integración. Los productos con ecosistemas de integración de mayor calidad tienen más probabilidades de ofrecer un stack tecnológico conectado. |
| Enfoque en el cliente |
|
¿Qué tan centrada en el cliente es esta organización? Soporte certificado, Consistencia de reseñas, Completitud del perfil ▾ Evalúa si la empresa ha obtenido la Certificación de Soporte al Cliente de HTR, mantiene una recolección consistente de reseñas a lo largo del tiempo (un indicador de cultura orientada al feedback) y mantiene los perfiles de producto completos con capacidades, capturas de pantalla, precios y funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, solidez y recursos |
|
¿Qué tan extenso es el alcance y los recursos de esta empresa? Alcance geográfico, Solidez, Recursos de la empresa, Puntuación de tendencia ▾ Mide la presencia global (países y regiones atendidos), los años en el negocio como indicador de estabilidad, el tamaño del equipo como indicador de recursos y una puntuación de tendencia basada en consultas de compradores, reseñas, recomendaciones de socios y actividad en prensa de los últimos doce meses. |
Las calificaciones y reseñas de clientes son con diferencia el factor más importante en el algoritmo del HT Score. HTR no acepta pagos a cambio de mejores posiciones en el ranking. Todas las reseñas son verificadas: solo profesionales de la industria hotelera con afiliaciones confirmadas pueden enviar calificaciones. Ver metodología completa del HT Score →
Asesor de recomendaciones de productos