The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
2C2P se distingue .
roommaster se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenization.
Notes comparees basees sur 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 23 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de traitement des paiements pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | 2C2P |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 6 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 7 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #4 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #4 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | 2C2P |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 avis |
| Luxe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #4 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #4 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment | 2C2P |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #4 14 avis |
| Europe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #3 0 avis |
When selecting a payments processing solution for your hotel, your primary goal is reliability, ease of use, and features that streamline your operations. Both 2C2P by 2C2P and roommaster Payments aim to address these needs, but they diverge significantly in market presence, user reviews, and overall maturity. 2C2P is a newer entrant with no recent reviews or ratings, while roommaster Payments boasts a substantial review base, recent feedback, and high customer support ratings. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s priorities?
2C2P and roommaster Payments are designed to handle hotel payments, but their track records differ sharply. 2C2P, with no reviews and a score of 0, offers no recent customer feedback to validate its effectiveness or user satisfaction, which makes it a risky choice. Meanwhile, roommaster Payments, with 20 reviews and a recent NPS score of 8.4/10, provides a clearer picture of reliability, ease of use, and customer satisfaction.
The main distinction lies in market presence and proven performance. 2C2P is virtually untested in your hotel industry, whereas roommaster Payments has a widespread footprint in North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and other regions, serving a broad range of hotel types. Given the lack of recent reviews for 2C2P, can you confidently rely on its promises? Or do you prefer a solution with validated success stories and ongoing customer feedback? The choice hinges on how much risk you are willing to take.
If your hotel prioritizes a payment system with extensive features, proven customer support, and a strong reputation, roommaster Payments is the clear choice. It suits hotels that need robust transaction options, dispute management, and seamless integration with numerous PMS systems — especially if you operate in North America or regions where their presence is strongest.
Conversely, if your hotel is open to exploring new providers without proven customer satisfaction, and if budget constraints or niche regional needs drive your decision, 2C2P might be worth considering. However, the absence of reviews and limited integration options make it less suitable for hotels seeking stability and ongoing support.
In summary, for hotels that require reliability, high usability, and proven results, roommaster Payments is the safer bet. For those willing to risk less-tested solutions, 2C2P might be a placeholder, but with significant caveats.
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and guest satisfaction. Roommaster Payments scores 4.4/5 based on recent reviews, with users describing its interface as intuitive, straightforward, and well-suited to busy hotel environments. Reviewers also highlight its seamless integration with PMS systems and quick processing, which minimizes operational hiccups.
In contrast, 2C2P has a rating of 0/5 with no recent reviews, indicating a lack of user feedback or consistent user experience data. Without any ratings, it’s impossible to determine how user-friendly or reliable the platform truly is. Given the importance of daily operational efficiency, a solution with proven ease of use is essential.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments offers a comprehensive feature set tailored for hospitality payments, including authorization adjustments, refunds, pay-by-link, contactless payments, chargeback management, tokenization, pre-authorizations, 3-D Secure, PCI compliance, and payment splitting — totaling 13 unique features. These features enable hotels to handle complex payment workflows and improve operational control.
2C2P, by contrast, offers zero unique features based on current data, implying limited capabilities or a lack of detailed feature offerings. Without added functionalities, 2C2P cannot match the operational flexibility that roommaster Payments provides.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Customer support quality is a decisive factor. roommaster Payments has a support rating of 4.45/5, with recent reviews praising the helpfulness, knowledge, and responsiveness of their team. Users report timely issue resolution and straightforward communication, which is vital when resolving payment issues or system outages.
2C2P has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess their responsiveness or quality. Given the critical nature of payment systems, support excellence cannot be overlooked.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments boasts 56 verified integrations, including well-known hospitality systems like Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Otelier, along with many others. This extensive partner network enables smoother workflows and reduces integration headaches.
2C2P has only one verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution, which limits its connectivity options significantly. For hotels relying on multiple systems or seeking a flexible ecosystem, roommaster Payments clearly has the upper hand.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
While 2C2P has no reviews, roommaster Payments has 20 recent reviews, with an average NPS of 8.4/10, and an overall customer satisfaction rating of 4.45/5. Hoteliers consistently praise its support, ease of use, and operational efficiency.
In particular, hotels across various segments, including boutique and resort properties, rate roommaster Payments highly for its reliability and customer service. With no reviews or ratings for 2C2P, the data clearly favors roommaster Payments as the higher-rated choice.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Pricing details are limited for 2C2P, with no information on fees or subscription models. Its lack of transparency raises questions about total cost and value.
roommaster Payments charges a base fee of $300 and does not specify additional monthly or per-room costs. Its transparent pricing model, combined with high feature value, suggests a straightforward investment for hotels seeking dependable payment processing.
Not ideal if your hotel values stability, extensive features, or comprehensive support.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in a niche region where roommaster’s presence is minimal, or if you prefer a free or very low-cost solution.
The core difference lies in reliability and proven performance. roommaster Payments, with extensive reviews, high customer satisfaction, and a broad feature set, offers a clear advantage for hotels seeking stability. 2C2P remains largely untested in this sector, with no recent feedback or demonstrated capabilities, making it a risky choice for operational-critical payments.
If your hotel needs a trusted, supported, and feature-complete payment solution, go with roommaster Payments. It has demonstrated its value across multiple regions and hotel types. If you are willing to gamble on an unreviewed platform with no recent data, 2C2P might be an option, but expect potential pitfalls and limited support.
In conclusion, for most hotels, especially those seeking peace of mind and proven performance, roommaster Payments is the smarter investment. It provides the peace of mind, operational efficiency, and support necessary to focus on guest experience rather than payment headaches.
La tarification des Logiciel de traitement des paiements est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| 2C2P |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, 2C2P et roommaster Payments partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | 2C2P |
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepte les visas | ||
| Ajustements d'autorisation | ||
| Capture partielle | ||
| Fonction de gratuité | ||
| Gestion des remboursements | ||
| Payer par lien |
Affichage des principales differences. 1 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. 2C2P et roommaster Payments partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Payments Processing Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. 2C2P propose 1 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que roommaster Payments en propose 56. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. roommaster Payments est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.2/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
2C2P : Non. roommaster Payments : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Payments Processing Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. 2C2P a un HT Score de 0 et roommaster a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété