The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 15 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
AeroGuest se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme PMS Integration.
Hoteza se distingue en ROI and onboarding , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Lobby Kiosk.
Notes comparees basees sur 15 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 13 | 2 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Enregistrement sans contact pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) | #15 1 avis | #20 0 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #8 9 avis | #11 2 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | #17 1 avis | #22 0 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #11 2 avis | #9 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 10 avis | #12 2 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #11 5 avis | #12 1 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | #19 1 avis | #16 0 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | #16 0 avis | #17 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #12 0 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #8 12 avis | #11 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #8 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | #8 1 avis | #6 0 avis |
Choosing the right contactless check-in system for your hotel hinges on understanding each product’s strengths and limitations. AeroGuest Check-in by AeroGuest and Hoteza Check-In by Hoteza both aim to streamline arrivals, reduce queues, and enhance guest experiences, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, segment, and technological needs.
AeroGuest boasts broader adoption, more recent reviews, and a higher overall rating, making it a compelling choice if your priority is proven reliability and extensive integrations. Hoteza, despite fewer reviews, offers a highly rated, easy-to-use platform with strong support and customization options. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s operational goals?
Both AeroGuest and Hoteza focus on contactless check-in, reducing manual front-desk interactions and providing a smoother arrival experience. AeroGuest’s platform emphasizes automation with integrations to over 14 PMS systems, allowing full pre-arrival check-in and room selection, which is ideal for hotels seeking high levels of operational automation. Conversely, Hoteza’s solution is web-based and app-free, designed for quick, straightforward implementation, often favored by smaller or mid-sized hotels needing a simple, reliable solution.
While AeroGuest has a broader market footprint, including regions like North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, Hoteza maintains a strong presence mainly in North America, South America, and Europe. Both products aim to reduce queues and manual input, but AeroGuest’s more extensive integration ecosystem and broader geographic reach make it more adaptable for large or international hotels. Do you prioritize a globally proven solution or a straightforward, easy-to-deploy system?
If your hotel operates in a large market or requires integration with multiple PMS and third-party systems, AeroGuest is the better fit. Its 26 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and SiteMinder, provide seamless integration, making it ideal if automation and data flow are critical to your operations. AeroGuest’s high review count (11 reviews in the last six months) and 5/5 overall rating reflect proven customer satisfaction.
If your hotel is smaller, values simplicity, or wants a solution with a quick setup and high ease of use, Hoteza should be your choice. With only 2 recent reviews but a perfect 5/5 ease-of-use rating and support, Hoteza appeals to hotels prioritizing straightforward implementation and dedicated support. Its cloud-based, app-free approach minimizes tech complexity, suitable for properties that prefer minimal integration efforts.
In summary, choose AeroGuest if you need advanced automation and extensive integrations; opt for Hoteza if you prefer simplicity and direct support. Your hotel’s size and technological infrastructure should guide this decision.
AeroGuest scores 4.77/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its seamless, mobile-first approach that lets guests check in, select rooms, and pay before arrival. Its onboarding process averages 4.6/5, and users highlight the platform’s intuitive nature, though some note room for improved chat features outside the backend.
Hoteza, rated slightly higher at 5/5, is praised for its straightforward, web-based interface, which requires no app download. Its onboarding is rated perfect, with users finding it quick to teach staff and guests. Given Hoteza’s focus on simplicity and quick setup, it’s favored for properties that want minimal training and hassle.
Edge: Hoteza.
Both platforms share 18 core features, such as digital check-in, payment processing, and multilingual support. AeroGuest offers additional capabilities like PMS integration, a feature only it possesses, allowing it to connect seamlessly with existing property systems.
Hoteza provides unique features like Lobby Kiosk and Automatic Translations, which are absent in AeroGuest. Its customizable, multilingual interface and digital signature options enhance international guest handling. Overall, AeroGuest’s extensive integrations and feature set make it more comprehensive for large properties, while Hoteza’s simplicity and specialized features suit smaller hotels.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s support team scores 4.77/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, reliable assistance and smooth onboarding. Customers describe AeroGuest support as "responsive and helpful," though some suggest more proactive communication on emerging trends.
Hoteza’s support is rated perfect at 5/5, with reviews praising its promptness and personalized attention. Hotel staff appreciate the straightforward, effective support that helps them implement the platform quickly, especially for international properties with multilingual needs.
Edge: Hoteza.
AeroGuest boasts 26 verified partners, including major PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality, and integrations with channel managers and mobile access systems. Shared integrations include Stayntouch, Mews, and Vingcard, but AeroGuest’s broader partner list indicates greater flexibility for complex setups.
Hoteza offers 20 verified partners, including hotelkit, Shiji Group, and Amadeus, focusing more on hospitality-specific solutions but with fewer total integrations. If extensive third-party connectivity is vital, AeroGuest’s larger partner ecosystem provides a clear advantage.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s 11 recent reviews and overall 5/5 rating underscore its strong customer satisfaction, especially among city center and boutique hotels. Reviewers appreciate its automation, ease of use, and integration capabilities, with one noting, “AeroGuest makes the check-in process effortless, reducing queues and administrative work.”
Hoteza’s limited reviews (2 recent) and perfect 5/5 ratings reflect a highly favorable perception among early adopters, mainly in North America and Europe. Its simplicity and dedicated support earn praise, though the smaller sample size suggests less widespread validation.
Given the larger review base and higher recent activity, AeroGuest holds the edge.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest charges a base fee of $400, with no mention of additional implementation, monthly, or per-room fees. Its straightforward pricing appeals to hotels seeking predictable costs without extra charges.
Hoteza’s base price is $600, also without additional charges, but often requires a longer-term commitment for full deployment. While slightly more expensive, Hoteza’s pricing reflects its comprehensive features and support.
If budget is a primary concern, AeroGuest’s lower price point offers more value for similar core functionality. However, consider whether additional features justify the extra cost.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
AeroGuest and Hoteza both aim to simplify contactless check-in, but AeroGuest’s extensive integrations, broader global presence, and larger review base give it a decisive advantage. Its focus on automation and scalability makes it suitable for larger, complex hotels.
Choose AeroGuest if your goal is high-level automation, proven performance, and extensive system connectivity. Its broad market reach and recent high ratings assure reliability and ongoing support.
Opt for Hoteza if your hotel is smaller, values ease of use, quick setup, and personalized support. Its app-free design and simplicity make it ideal for properties seeking to enhance guest experiences without heavy tech investments.
In conclusion, AeroGuest is the more proven, feature-rich platform for most large or international hotels. Hoteza is a strong contender for properties valuing simplicity, quick deployment, and personalized support.
Note: This comparison is based solely on available reviews, feature lists, and pricing data. Your specific needs and technical environment will ultimately determine the best fit.
La tarification des Enregistrement sans contact est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, AeroGuest Check-in et Hoteza Check-In partagent 18 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations | ||
| Intégration PMS | ||
| Kiosque du hall |
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. AeroGuest Check-in et Hoteza Check-In partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Contactless Check-in de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. AeroGuest Check-in propose 26 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Hoteza Check-In en propose 20. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Hoteza Check-In est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
AeroGuest Check-in : Non. Hoteza Check-In : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Contactless Check-in proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. AeroGuest a un HT Score de 0 et Hoteza a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété