The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 176 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
aleno se distingue en onboarding , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Credit Card Payments and Payments Integrations.
Mews se distingue en matiere de interface utilisateur et rapports , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
Notes comparees basees sur 176 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 7 | 169 |
Apres analyse de 176 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de aleno apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 2 avis | #2 44 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #9 3 avis | #3 94 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #8 1 avis | #5 7 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 9 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 3 avis | #3 74 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #9 2 avis | #3 41 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #8 2 avis | #3 31 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #5 1 avis | #2 12 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 14 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #4 6 avis | #2 130 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #5 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #6 0 avis |
Choosing the right hotel POS system can significantly influence your team's efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both aleno by aleno and Mews POS aim to streamline operations, but they approach this goal differently. While aleno focuses on connecting room and F&B services with real-time data exchange, Mews POS offers an all-in-one hotel restaurant POS integrated directly with its PMS. Which solution aligns better with your hotel's needs?
Both products target hotel restaurants and F&B operations, aiming to boost sales and improve guest experiences. aleno emphasizes its ability to connect seamlessly with PMS and POS systems, providing proactive guest activity management and detailed customer data. Mews POS, on the other hand, positions itself as a comprehensive, mobile-friendly POS platform that automates transactions, inventory, and reporting, with a focus on operational fluidity.
aleno's platform is cloud-based, integrates with leading PMS and POS, and offers features like guest profiles, marketing campaigns, and segmentation, making it ideal for hotels seeking personalized service and enhanced guest data management. Mews POS is praised for its ease of implementation, real-time reporting, and its ability to connect with a broad ecosystem of third-party tools, making it suitable for hotels desiring a unified, digital guest experience.
Both systems aim to optimize F&B revenue and operational consistency, but their focus areas diverge. If your team prioritizes real-time guest activity control and detailed data exchange, aleno could be more suitable. If you want a flexible, modern POS that integrates seamlessly with your existing tools and supports a range of ordering types, Mews POS might be the better fit.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, easy-to-implement POS that offers an extensive ecosystem of integrations and automation, go with Mews POS. It is designed for properties that value operational efficiency, real-time reporting, and a mobile, user-friendly interface, especially since it boasts 156 recent reviews and a high customer support rating of 4.43/5.
If your team requires a platform that emphasizes connecting rooms and F&B via real-time data exchange, and your hotel benefits from detailed customer profiling, aleno is worth considering. However, with only 7 reviews and a lower overall rating, its market presence and proven track record are less compelling than Mews POS.
Given the recency and volume of reviews, Mews POS clearly leads in reliability and ongoing support. Its broader user base and more recent feedback make it a more trustworthy choice for hotels seeking a proven POS solution.
Both platforms are highly rated for ease of use, with aleno earning a 4.71/5 and Mews POS slightly edging ahead at 4.74/5. aleno's intuitive interface, quick setup, and helpful onboarding process make it straightforward for staff to adopt, as reflected in positive reviews mentioning fast training and simple management.
Mews POS also scores highly for usability, praised for its modern interface, cross-device accessibility, and seamless onboarding, which many users describe as structured and efficient. Its mobile design supports staff flexibility and quick reactions, essential in busy restaurant environments.
Edge: Mews POS, due to its slightly higher overall usability rating and extensive positive feedback on implementation.
aleno offers 15 unique features, including POS and PMS integrations, QR codes, loyalty programs, customer management, and in-venue ordering, focusing on real-time guest activity management and marketing tools. Mews POS provides 24 unique features—covering digital menus, check splitting, inventory management, rewards programs, and detailed reporting—adding more operational tools and automation options.
While aleno excels in guest data personalization and marketing, Mews POS's broader feature set supports a wider range of operational needs, especially for larger or more complex properties. The greater number of features and integrations in Mews POS give it an edge for properties seeking a versatile, all-in-one POS system.
Edge: Mews POS, with its larger feature set and extensive management tools.
aleno's support rating is 4.71/5, with reviews highlighting quick, professional responses and supportive team members. Many users describe aleno's support as proactive and helpful, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Mews POS’s support, rated at 4.43/5, is praised for its reliability but occasionally noted for slower onboarding or deployment issues, especially given its scale and growth. However, its large support team and extensive training resources contribute to overall customer satisfaction.
Edge: aleno, due to its higher recent support ratings and consistent praise for responsiveness.
Mews POS offers 336 verified integrations, including major partners like Oracle Hospitality, Lightspeed, Sage, and many others. It provides extensive connectivity with third-party systems, channel managers, and payment providers, facilitating a highly integrated ecosystem.
aleno has 6 verified partners, including PMS and POS integrations, but its ecosystem is far smaller than Mews. The limited number of integrations may restrict scalability or customization for hotels with complex operational needs.
Edge: Mews POS, with a vast array of integrations and a proven ecosystem.
Mews POS has amassed 156 recent reviews, with a clear majority praising its ease of use, support, and operational efficiency. Its overall rating of 100 in the HTTR Score and a 95% likelihood to recommend reflect high satisfaction across hotel segments, especially in boutique, city center, and branded hotels.
aleno's reviews are minimal—only 7—and mostly positive, but the lack of recent feedback limits confidence in its current performance. Its rating of 0/5 suggests limited user engagement or reviews, making Mews POS the more highly rated and trusted option.
Edge: Mews POS due to its larger, more recent review base and higher hotelier satisfaction ratings.
aleno does not list specific pricing, indicating it may be custom or unavailable publicly. Mews POS starts at $200 per month, with no additional implementation or setup fees, making it transparent and predictable for budgeting.
This difference suggests Mews POS is more straightforward to evaluate financially, while aleno’s pricing model remains unclear, potentially requiring direct contact for quotes.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a broad feature set, extensive integrations, or a large community of users. Small or mid-sized hotels with complex operational workflows may find aleno’s limited features restrictive.
Not ideal if your hotel has very simple F&B needs or prefers a minimal setup, as Mews POS’s extensive features might be more than necessary.
Mews POS is a comprehensive, well-supported, and highly integrated POS platform that fits hotels seeking operational automation and real-time insights. Its extensive features, broad ecosystem, and large review base provide confidence for properties of various sizes and segments.
aleno offers specialized features that connect room and F&B services with real-time data exchange, making it appealing for hotels focused on personalized guest experiences and marketing. However, its smaller market presence and limited reviews make it a less proven choice at scale.
If your hotel values proven reliability, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction, Mews POS clearly stands out. Choose Mews if you want a flexible, scalable POS with a strong support network.
If your hotel’s focus is on guest data-driven F&B experiences and seamless room-F&B integration, and you’re comfortable with a smaller, less-reviewed platform, aleno could work. But for most hotels aiming for stability and growth, Mews POS is the safer recommendation.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, aleno et Mews POS partagent 5 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Application en marque blanche | ||
| Basé sur le Web (Appless) | ||
| Codes QR | ||
| Commande en libre-service à table | ||
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Intégration PMS | ||
| Intégration de point de vente | ||
| Menus numériques | ||
| Paiements par carte de crédit | ||
| Rapports de journal de paiement | ||
| Réductions et promotions |
Affichage des principales differences. 27 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. aleno et Mews POS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. aleno propose 6 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews POS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. aleno est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
aleno : Non. Mews POS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. aleno a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits