The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
AmicHotel se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $200/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de AmicHotel apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between AmicHotel by AmicHotel and Mews PMS by Mews is a decision rooted in your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but their capabilities, scale, and user feedback differ significantly. AmicHotel offers a basic solution with limited reviews and no recent data, whereas Mews dominates with extensive, recent feedback and a broad feature set.
Your team needs to assess if a simple, possibly regional tool suffices or if a robust, scalable platform is necessary. Are you ready to prioritize a mature, highly-rated system that supports growth and innovation? Or are you comfortable with a minimal solution that lacks recent validation?
AmicHotel and Mews both address core property management challenges like reservations, billing, and housekeeping. However, AmicHotel’s review count is zero, and its ratings are nonexistent, providing no recent customer insights or validation.
In contrast, Mews has over 750 reviews, with 98 in the last six months, underpinning its strong reputation. Mews’s 4.62/5 overall rating, ease of use, and 93% likelihood to recommend make it the clear industry favorite. Do you want to rely on a system with no recent data or one consistently rated highly by modern hoteliers?
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich platform capable of supporting multi-property management, dynamic revenue strategies, and extensive integrations, Mews is the obvious choice. Its 336 verified partners and 54 regional coverage demonstrate its scalability.
If your hotel is small, regional, or only needs basic reservation management without support for multiple locations or integrations, AmicHotel might suffice—though it offers no features or verified partners. Given the data, Mews’s extensive features, support, and recent reviews make it the safer and more strategic investment for growth-oriented hotels.
AmicHotel scores a 0/5 for ease of use, with no recent reviews to gauge its UI or onboarding. Its lack of recent validation suggests limited usability support and potential complexity or poor adoption.
Mews, on the other hand, boasts a 4.7/5 rating for ease of use, backed by 98 recent reviews praising its modern, intuitive interface and smooth onboarding process. Multiple reviewers mention how quickly they adopted the platform and how it simplifies daily tasks. Edge: Mews.
AmicHotel provides zero unique features, indicating it is likely a basic or incomplete PMS. It offers no additional modules or integrations, limiting its functionality.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual/multi-currency support, a revenue management module, guest CRM, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, automated night audit, mobile app, guest messaging, digital registration, and extensive reporting tools. Its marketplace provides over 1,000 integrations, vastly surpassing AmicHotel’s capabilities. Edge: Mews.
AmicHotel’s customer support is unverified—no recent reviews or ratings exist to gauge assistance quality.
Mews’s customer support scores a 4.27/5, with reviews highlighting responsive, helpful support teams and well-structured onboarding. Many praise Mews for prompt bug resolution and proactive communication, essential for operational stability. Edge: Mews.
AmicHotel has no verified partners, severely limiting its ability to connect with other tools or systems.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including shared partners like Sage and Hotel Investor Apps, plus many unique ones such as Criton, Right Revenue, FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access, and more. This extensive ecosystem allows tailored tech stacks and operational flexibility. Edge: Mews.
AmicHotel’s ratings are absent, offering no basis for user satisfaction evaluation.
Mews enjoys a 4.62/5 score, with extensive recent positive reviews across a variety of hotel types—from boutique to large chains. Hotels like Episode Tbilisi and Cresta Palace highlight Mews’s connectivity, ease of use, and revenue impact, with many reviewers emphasizing its role in operational efficiency. Edge: Mews.
AmicHotel provides no pricing information, suggesting it may be free, limited, or incomplete.
Mews’s base price is $900/month, with no free tier or trial, but many users feel this cost yields significant value considering its features, support, and scale. Its pricing reflects its enterprise-ready capabilities, especially for multi-property management and integrations.
Mews is a comprehensive, highly-rated platform suited for hotels aiming to grow, innovate, and deliver superior guest experiences. Its 98 recent reviews and 4.62/5 rating attest to its reliability and user satisfaction.
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable PMS with extensive features, integrations, and ongoing support, choosing Mews is a clear decision. For very small, regional operations with minimal tech requirements, AmicHotel might suffice temporarily, but it offers no recent validation or advanced functionality.
In summary, Mews is the better choice for ambitious hotels ready to embrace modern hospitality technology. AmicHotel’s limited scope and lack of recent reviews make it a risky, short-term solution at best.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, AmicHotel et Mews PMS partagent 44 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes |
Affichage des principales differences. 3 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. AmicHotel et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. AmicHotel propose 1 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
AmicHotel : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. AmicHotel a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 99. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits