The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,436 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Spa & Wellness Module.
Mews se distingue en matiere de ease of use — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Centralized Messaging.
Notes comparees basees sur 1,436 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 1,436 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #52 4 avis | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right PMS can transform your hotel operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. HotelTime PMS and Mews PMS both aim to streamline these areas, but differences in scale, features, and recent reviews reveal which may better suit your needs.
HotelTime, with a solid European presence and over 430 reviews, offers a comprehensive system for properties of all sizes, especially resorts and groups. Mews, with nearly 760 reviews and a global reach, is favored by modern hotels seeking automation, extensive integrations, and scalable cloud-based solutions.
Are you looking for a mature platform with proven stability or a dynamic, innovative system that adapts quickly? The answer depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and tech ambitions.
Both products serve the same purpose: managing reservations, front-office tasks, and operational workflows. However, HotelTime's stronghold is in Europe and the Middle East, with a focus on larger properties and chains, while Mews is more prevalent in North America and Asia Pacific, favored by boutique and independent hotels.
HotelTime’s recent reviews are fewer—27 in the last six months—limiting insight into its current performance, whereas Mews’s 98 recent reviews provide a clearer picture of ongoing improvements and user satisfaction.
HotelTime scores slightly higher in customer support and onboarding, with 4.73/5 and 4.63/5 respectively, versus Mews’s 4.27/5 and 4.39/5. Yet, Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 still indicates strong user confidence.
Do you prioritize extensive regional support or a rapidly evolving platform? The data suggests Mews’s recent momentum and larger review base make it the more reliable choice today.
If your hotel needs a fully featured, all-in-one PMS with deep integration into spa, wellness, and complex revenue streams, HotelTime is a strong candidate. It’s suitable for large resorts and groups that want a mature platform with extensive capabilities and regional support.
On the other hand, if you require a flexible, innovative system with over 50 features, including guest messaging, multi-currency, and a broad marketplace of third-party integrations, Mews is better. Its user-friendly interface and cloud-based scalability appeal to boutique hotels, independents, and properties aiming for operational automation.
For hotels prioritizing robust third-party integrations, Mews’s 336 verified partners outweigh HotelTime’s 58, making it more adaptable to evolving tech stacks. Conversely, HotelTime might be preferable if your hotel values a highly localized solution with strong support in Europe and Middle East.
User reviews rate Mews at 4.7/5 for ease of use, citing its modern, intuitive interface that minimizes training time and simplifies daily tasks. HotelTime’s ease of use is slightly lower at 4.66/5, with some users noting initial complexity due to its extensive modules but recognizing that familiarity improves efficiency.
HotelTime’s onboarding experience averages 4.63/5, praised for personalized support, whereas Mews’s onboarding rating of 4.39/5 reflects some initial setup challenges, especially in larger multi-property implementations.
Support ratings favor HotelTime, with 4.73/5, praised for responsiveness and expertise, while Mews’s 4.27/5 indicates room for improvement but still a generally positive experience.
Edge: Mews
HotelTime boasts 50 shared features plus a unique Spa & Wellness module, enabling comprehensive management of additional hotel services. In contrast, Mews offers 50 shared features with 9 exclusive functionalities, including guest apps, guest messaging, automated assignments, shift planning, and SOC2 compliance.
HotelTime’s specialization in wellness and resort features may appeal to larger properties, but Mews’s extensive marketplace—over 1,000 integrations—enables highly customizable workflows.
When considering features like multi-lingual, multi-currency, and guest communication, Mews’s broader set of exclusive features and integrations make it more versatile for modern hotel needs.
Edge: Mews
HotelTime’s support scores higher at 4.73/5, with numerous reviews praising their responsive, knowledgeable team and dedicated onboarding. Users often highlight how HotelTime staff go above and beyond to ensure setup success and ongoing assistance.
Mews’s support, rated at 4.27/5, is generally appreciated, but some recent reviews mention occasional bugs and slower responses. However, Mews’s rapid updates and active community mitigate these issues, and its support team remains proactive.
Given the more recent reviews and overall ratings, HotelTime’s support currently holds a slight edge.
Edge: HotelTime
HotelTime’s reviews are more recent (27 in the last 6 months) and consistently positive, especially among resorts and larger properties, with a 4.83/5 overall rating. Its traditional strength lies in stability and comprehensive features appreciated by established hotels.
Mews, with 98 recent reviews, has a slightly lower overall rating of 4.62/5 but dominates in user experience, innovation, and scalability, especially among boutique and independent hotels. Its reviews highlight ongoing improvements and high satisfaction with automation.
For properties seeking proven stability and regional support, HotelTime is favored. For those valuing flexibility, innovation, and a vibrant tech ecosystem, Mews is more highly rated.
Edge: Mews
HotelTime’s pricing is a flat $600/month without freemium options, implementation fees, or room-based charges. Mews’s pricing is higher at $900/month, with no trial or freemium offering, but it includes a broader set of features and integrations.
Prices reflect different target markets: HotelTime’s more straightforward model suits larger properties with predictable budgets, while Mews’s premium pricing aligns with hotels seeking advanced automation and extensive third-party connections.
Your decision may hinge on your budget and the value you place on features versus cost.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, solely budget-focused, or looking for rapid, cloud-native innovation.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in regions with limited Mews support or requires complex, bespoke module customization not yet available through integrations.
HotelTime offers a mature, highly capable system ideal for large resorts, chains, and properties needing comprehensive wellness and revenue modules. Its regional strength and customer support make it suitable for established operators prioritizing stability and local support.
Mews is best suited for modern hotels, boutique independents, and properties seeking a scalable, innovative platform with extensive integrations and automation. Its recent reviews and feature set favor hotels pushing toward digital transformation and guest-centric experiences.
If your hotel values a proven track record with regional support and extensive modules, HotelTime is the choice. If you want a future-proof, flexible solution that can grow and adapt quickly, Mews is the clear winner.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Mews PMS partagent 50 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Module Spa & Bien-être | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue |
Nous avons analyse 16 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits