The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Ankerdata Hsopitality se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
Notes comparees basees sur 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 169 |
Apres analyse de 169 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Ankerdata Hsopitality apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 44 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 94 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 7 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 9 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 74 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 41 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #3 31 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 12 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 14 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 130 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #5 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #6 0 avis |
Choosing the right POS system for your hotel can significantly impact operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Ankerdata POS and Mews POS aim to streamline transactions and integrate with hotel systems, but their approach, features, and market presence differ markedly. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs—yet, with the available data, one product clearly stands out.
Ankerdata POS has zero reviews across all key metrics, which severely limits confidence in its performance and support. Conversely, Mews POS boasts over 150 reviews, a recent surge (66 reviews in the last six months), and a high 9.32/5 NPS score, making it the more reliable choice for hoteliers.
Are you looking for a POS that’s proven, well-supported, and widely adopted? Or are you considering a less established option with limited feedback? The data points toward Mews being the stronger contender.
Both products aim to serve hotel operations, but their market presence and maturity differ. Ankerdata POS is a hospitality-specific POS solution that promotes transaction management and sales tracking but provides no reviews or detailed features, signaling a lack of proven user experience and ongoing support. Mews POS, on the other hand, is a purpose-built hotel POS with extensive integrations, real-time reporting, and broad adoption across different hotel segments, backed by more recent reviews and high hotel satisfaction.
This contrast indicates Mews’s stability and reliability far surpass Ankerdata’s unverified offering. Are you comfortable choosing a product without the backing of user feedback and proven support? Or do you prefer a product with a strong track record?
Given the current evidence, Mews’s tangible presence and positive reviews make it the more trustworthy choice for most hotels.
If your hotel needs a reliable, integrated POS solution with extensive third-party support, go with Mews. Its 336 verified integrations and demonstrated success in diverse hotel segments make it suitable for properties looking for comprehensive operational automation and detailed analytics.
If your hotel operates at a very small scale, prioritizes a simple transaction system, and is willing to risk unverified performance, Ankerdata might seem appealing—but the lack of reviews makes this a gamble. For most hotels seeking stability and proven performance, Mews is the clear winner.
In summary, choose Mews if you want a mature, well-supported platform with proven results. Ankerdata remains untested and unsupported by user feedback, making it a risky choice for most.
Ease of use heavily favors Mews, which has a 4.74/5 user rating and over 150 recent reviews highlighting its intuitive, modern interface and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers frequently mention how quickly staff learn the system and how seamlessly it integrates into daily operations.
Ankerdata, with a 0/5 score and no reviews, provides no user feedback or data on usability, making it impossible to assess. Without tangible evidence, you risk deploying a system that may not be user-friendly or well-supported.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a suite of 29 features, including PCI compliance, discounts & promotions, upselling, digital menus, mobile ordering, inventory and ingredient management, rewards programs, and extensive reporting tools. These features directly support hotel restaurants, F&B automation, and operational insights.
Ankerdata provides no documented features, which raises concern about its functionality and scope. Without any feature set or user reviews, it’s impossible to verify whether it meets modern hotel needs.
Edge: Mews.
Mews scores a 4.43/5 in customer support, with reviews praising its reliable, solution-oriented team and well-structured onboarding. Recent feedback indicates prompt responses and helpful guidance, especially during the critical initial setup phase.
Ankerdata offers no support ratings or reviews, leaving hotel teams with no assurance of support quality. Relying on an unsupported or unverified vendor is inherently risky, especially for mission-critical systems.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s marketplace features 336 verified integrations, including popular tools like Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, and multiple payment and marketing platforms. This extensive ecosystem simplifies connecting your existing systems and enhances overall operational flexibility.
Ankerdata, with zero verified integrations, provides no evidence of compatibility or expandability. This limits your hotel’s ability to customize or scale your POS as your technology stack evolves.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a high 9.32/5 NPS score and 95% likelihood to recommend, indicating strong user satisfaction. Hotels across segments—luxury, boutique, city center, and hostels—appreciate its ease of use, support, and feature richness.
Ankerdata’s lack of reviews means no ratings or feedback are available, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or performance.
Edge: Mews.
Ankerdata has no publicly available pricing information, and it does not offer a trial, which complicates budget planning. Mews charges a base price of $200/month, with no free tier or trial, providing a clear, predictable cost structure.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven value, your hotel can better evaluate ROI and plan budgets confidently. The absence of pricing from Ankerdata diminishes its attractiveness as a tested solution.
Mews is a well-established, feature-rich hotel POS with extensive integrations, strong support, and a proven track record backed by recent reviews. It’s suited for hotels of all sizes looking for automation, guest experience enhancement, and operational insights.
Ankerdata offers no user feedback or documented features, making it a risky, unverified option. If stability, support, and proven performance matter—and they should—Mews is the clear choice.
In summary, for most hotels, Mews provides the security of a tested, supported, and highly rated system. Ankerdata’s lack of reviews and features makes it a gamble that few hotels can afford in today’s competitive landscape.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Ankerdata POS et Mews POS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|---|---|---|
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Menus numériques | ||
| Rapports de journal de paiement | ||
| Réductions et promotions | ||
| Vente incitative |
Affichage des principales differences. 17 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Ankerdata POS et Mews POS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Ankerdata POS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews POS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Ankerdata POS : Non. Mews POS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Ankerdata Hsopitality a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits