The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
LCR Systems se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
Notes comparees basees sur 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 169 |
Apres analyse de 169 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de LCR Systems apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| LCR Systems |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | LCR Systems |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 44 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 94 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 7 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 9 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | LCR Systems |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 74 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 41 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #3 31 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 12 avis |
Par region
| Segment | LCR Systems |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 14 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 130 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #5 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #6 0 avis |
Choosing the right POS system for your hotel can dramatically impact operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Apollo EPOS by LCR Systems and Mews POS aim to improve your sales, manage inventory, and streamline service, but they diverge significantly in market presence, usability, and feature depth. With Mews POS holding a substantial lead in reviews, support, and regional coverage, it’s clear which product currently offers more reliable data and proven hotel success.
Are you ready to see which system better suits your hotel’s needs and future growth?
Both Apollo EPOS and Mews POS address core hotel POS needs—transaction management, inventory control, and reporting. Apollo EPOS claims to streamline retail and hospitality operations with real-time inventory and staff management but has zero reviews, leaving its effectiveness unverified.
In contrast, Mews POS has over 150 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its seamless integration with property management systems, online ordering, and automation features. Its high NPS score of 9.32/10 and 95% likelihood to recommend underscore its strong reputation among hoteliers.
Do hotel operators trust unreviewed solutions, or does verified customer feedback tilt the scale?
If your hotel needs a scalable, well-supported POS with robust integrations and a proven track record, go with Mews POS. It’s suitable for a range of property sizes, especially those seeking digital ordering, inventory management, and extensive third-party connectivity.
If your hotel only requires basic transaction processing without extensive support or recent reviews, Apollo EPOS might be considered, but note the lack of public ratings or customer feedback. Its unverified standing makes it a risky choice for most hotels.
For hotels aiming for modern digital workflows, Mews POS offers a clear edge—particularly given its market presence and recent positive reviews.
Mews POS scores 4.74/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, modern design, and cross-device functionality—whether on desktops, tablets, or smartphones. Onboarding is rated similarly high at 4.39/5, with users describing the process as well-structured and support as reliable.
Apollo EPOS, meanwhile, has a 0/5 rating across usability metrics, with no customer reviews available. Its interface and onboarding experience remain unverified, making it difficult to assess whether your team would adopt it readily.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS boasts over 29 distinct features, including PCI compliance, digital menus, mobile ordering, inventory and ingredient management, loyalty programs, and comprehensive reporting tools. Many of these are absent in Apollo EPOS, which offers no public list of features.
Apollo EPOS’s features are unlisted and unreviewed, casting doubt on their scope or sophistication. Given Mews’s extensive feature set tailored for hospitality, it clearly outstrips Apollo’s offerings.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS is rated 4.43/5 for customer support, with reviews emphasizing reliable, solution-oriented assistance, especially during onboarding. Its well-structured onboarding process and responsive support team are often cited as key strengths.
Apollo EPOS has a 0/5 rating and no reviews, leaving its support quality unknown. Without customer feedback or support ratings, it’s impossible to confidently assess its service quality.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews provides access to 336 verified integrations, including major channel managers, payment gateways, and property management systems—making it highly adaptable for diverse hotel setups. Shared integrations are nonexistent but its extensive partner network gives flexibility.
Apollo EPOS offers no verified integrations or partner list, raising concerns about connectivity and future scalability. Its lack of integration options puts it at a disadvantage for hotels seeking a connected tech environment.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS receives a 100/100 HTR Score, with a 95% likelihood to recommend and a high volume of recent reviews from hotels ranging from boutique properties to larger hotels. Hotels consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature richness.
In contrast, Apollo EPOS has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction or performance. The absence of recent feedback severely diminishes confidence in its effectiveness.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS costs $200 per month with no additional implementation fees, offering a transparent subscription model. Pricing for Apollo EPOS is undisclosed, and no free trial or demo information is available.
The transparency and affordability of Mews’s pricing make it easier to evaluate ROI compared to Apollo’s unclear costs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in market presence: Mews POS has a proven track record, a large customer base, and verified reviews, whereas Apollo EPOS remains unreviewed and unverified. Mews consistently earns high marks for usability, support, and features, making it the more reliable choice today.
Choose Mews POS if you want a well-supported, feature-rich solution with proven hotel success, especially if you value recent reviews and a global presence. Apollo EPOS might appeal for very basic needs, but its lack of feedback and integrations makes it a risky pick for most hotels.
For hotels that aim to modernize, streamline operations, and deliver exceptional guest service, Mews POS provides the clear advantage—its recent reviews and user satisfaction demonstrate its value.
In summary: If recent, verified hotel reviews and extensive features matter for your decision, Mews POS stands out as the smarter, safer choice. Apollo EPOS's unverified status and lack of reviews mean it should be approached cautiously unless your needs are extremely minimal.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| LCR Systems |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Apollo EPOS et Mews POS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | LCR Systems |
|
|---|---|---|
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Menus numériques | ||
| Rapports de journal de paiement | ||
| Réductions et promotions | ||
| Vente incitative |
Affichage des principales differences. 17 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Apollo EPOS et Mews POS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Apollo EPOS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews POS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Apollo EPOS : Non. Mews POS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. LCR Systems a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits