The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 18 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Asana se distingue .
LIKE MAGIC se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile access on any device.
Notes comparees basees sur 18 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $1,100/mo |
| Avis verifies | 2 | 16 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Outils de collaboration du personnel pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #14 1 avis | #7 7 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #25 1 avis | #16 5 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #19 2 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #17 5 avis |
| Luxe | #26 1 avis | #24 2 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | #26 1 avis | #25 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #8 8 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #32 1 avis | #33 0 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #23 1 avis | #6 15 avis |
When evaluating staff collaboration tools for your hotel, you face a choice between Asana and LIKE MAGIC. Both aim to improve team coordination and streamline operations, but they serve different needs. Asana is a well-established project management platform, while LIKE MAGIC is a hotel-specific, automation-driven guest experience platform. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both products address operational inefficiencies, but they approach the problem differently. Asana focuses on task and project management for teams, whereas LIKE MAGIC automates guest interactions and routine tasks. Are you looking to enhance internal collaboration or guest-facing automation? That’s the core question.
The more recent reviews and the higher review count favor LIKE MAGIC. With 16 reviews in the last six months and a 99% likelihood to recommend, LIKE MAGIC’s data is more current and reliable. Asana’s only two reviews, both older, make its ratings less representative of today’s performance. So, which product do you trust more based on recent user feedback?
Both products aim to improve operational workflows, but they are designed for different aspects of hotel management. Asana offers a simple, flexible tool for task tracking and team communication, suitable for various industries but not purpose-built for hospitality. LIKE MAGIC, on the other hand, is a dedicated hotel operations platform that automates guest interactions from booking to checkout.
Asana’s core strength lies in its ability to organize internal team tasks, with a 4/5 ease-of-use rating and mostly positive reviews about managing communication and teamwork. It’s used mainly by standard hotels and is appreciated for its versatility in non-hotel settings. However, its lack of hotel-specific features and integrations can be a drawback.
LIKE MAGIC excels in automating guest journeys with 12 unique features, including digital check-in, in-room dining, and automated messaging. Its 5/5 ease of use rating and near-perfect customer support score (4.88/5) reflect its hotel-specific design, making it ideal for properties seeking to reduce staff and enhance guest experiences. Which platform better suits your hotel’s operational focus?
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
If your hotel needs a dedicated platform to automate guest interactions and reduce staffing costs, LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. Its automation features—integrations with PMS, digital keys, guest messaging, and self-service capabilities—are unmatched and designed specifically for hotel operations.
If your team primarily needs a straightforward project management tool to organize internal tasks and improve communication, Asana is suitable, especially for hotels with smaller or less complex operations. However, given its limited hotel-specific features and the small volume of recent reviews, it’s less ideal for hotels aiming for digital guest experience enhancements.
For properties focused on internal team productivity without guest-facing automation, Asana could suffice. But for hotels committed to automating guest journeys and operational workflows, LIKE MAGIC offers a comprehensive, purpose-built solution. Which aligns with your immediate needs?
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s interface is rated 4/5 and is praised for being simple and open, helping teams adopt the platform with some training. Its onboarding score (3/5) indicates a decent experience but may require internal effort to standardize usage across teams.
LIKE MAGIC’s interface scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with a nearly perfect onboarding score of 4.93/5. Its hotel-specific design minimizes staff training time and reduces onboarding friction, especially for properties with limited tech experience.
Based on recent reviews, LIKE MAGIC’s intuitive platform and quick setup give it a notable edge for hotels seeking rapid deployment without extensive training.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana offers 0 unique hotel-specific features, focusing mainly on task tracking, communication, and project management. Its strengths lie in general collaboration tools, but it lacks automation for guest services or operational workflows.
LIKE MAGIC provides 12 distinct features tailored for hospitality, including work prioritization, real-time task tracking, file libraries, automated replies, multi-property monitoring, and an open API. These features directly support automating guest interactions, staff workflows, and service delivery, making it the more feature-rich choice for hotels.
Given the hotel-specific features and integrations, LIKE MAGIC clearly stands out. If you need automation and guest journey management, it offers more relevant tools.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s customer support score of 2.5/5 reflects mixed reviews. Some users find it difficult to get timely help, and onboarding can be inconsistent, requiring additional internal effort.
LIKE MAGIC boasts a support rating of 4.88/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and dedicated assistance. Hotel clients praise the platform’s ongoing product evolution and attentive support, which enhances their operational confidence.
For hotels prioritizing reliable, responsive support, LIKE MAGIC’s high rating makes it the preferable option.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with hotel systems directly. This can restrict its usefulness in a hotel environment where seamless data flow is essential.
LIKE MAGIC integrates with 10 verified partners, including PMS systems like 4SUITES, apaleo, and Mews, as well as payment and guest messaging platforms. These integrations streamline operations and reduce manual data entry.
If integrations are crucial for your hotel’s technology ecosystem, LIKE MAGIC’s broader connectivity provides a significant advantage.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana’s reviews are limited and older, with a 4.5/5 overall rating based on only 2 reviews. Its users appreciate its simplicity but note its lack of hotel-specific features.
LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews, totaling 16 in the last six months, give it a 4.88/5 customer support score and a 99% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across Europe and Asia Pacific, particularly extended stay and boutique properties, praise its automation and operational efficiencies.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, LIKE MAGIC’s user ratings are more indicative of current performance and satisfaction.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Asana does not publicly disclose pricing, and it offers a free basic version limited to small teams. Larger teams or advanced features require custom pricing, which can be costly and complex to scale.
LIKE MAGIC charges a flat fee of $1,100 per month, with no free tier or trial. This fee grants access to its full suite of hotel-specific features and integrations.
For clarity and predictability, LIKE MAGIC’s straightforward pricing makes it easier for hotels to budget and evaluate ROI.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Asana is suitable for basic internal collaboration but less so for automating guest services.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
LIKE MAGIC is best for hotels committed to digital guest experience transformation.
The core difference lies in their purpose: Asana is a general project management tool, while LIKE MAGIC is tailored for hotel operations automation. If your priority is internal team collaboration without guest-facing features, Asana might suffice, but it lacks hotel-specific integrations and automation.
Choose Asana if your team needs a flexible internal collaboration platform and your hotel’s operations are simple. However, for hotels seeking to streamline guest interactions, automate workflows, and reduce staffing, LIKE MAGIC provides a more suitable, hotel-centric solution.
When to choose Asana: You’re focused on internal team productivity, have a small team, and don’t require guest automation. When to choose LIKE MAGIC: Your goal is to automate guest journeys, reduce staffing costs, and integrate seamlessly with your property systems.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction through automation, LIKE MAGIC is the stronger choice. Its recent reviews, hotel-specific features, and broader integrations make it the more reliable, future-proof solution.
La tarification des Outils de collaboration du personnel est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,100/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Asana et LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Départs tardifs | ||
| Journal de bord virtuel | ||
| La gestion de cas | ||
| Priorisation des travaux | ||
| Prise en charge de la bibliothèque de fichiers (images, documents et vidéos) | ||
| Suivi des tâches en temps réel |
Nous avons analyse 4 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
Mieux classe pour
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Asana et LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Staff Collaboration Tools de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Asana propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) en propose 10. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 4.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Asana : Non. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Staff Collaboration Tools proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Asana a un HT Score de 0 et LIKE MAGIC a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété