The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Ascon se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Ascon apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Ascon |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between Ascon by Ascon and Mews PMS by Mews comes down to understanding what your hotel needs most. Both products aim to streamline operations, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. Ascon’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s not actively used or supported, whereas Mews boasts a thriving user base, recent feedback, and extensive integrations. Are you prepared to rely on a platform with proven user satisfaction?
Mews’s robust community and high review volume demonstrate its relevance and reliability for modern hoteliers. Ascon’s absence of reviews and zero score make it an unlikely contender for a decision today—unless you’re exploring unknown options.
Both products solve core property management issues—streamlining reservations, guest management, and operational workflows. However, Mews’s comprehensive feature set includes over 59 unique tools, from revenue management to automated housekeeping, while Ascon offers no listed features. Mews’s recent reviews and high ratings reflect ongoing development and user satisfaction, unlike Ascon, which has no recent reviews or ratings and appears inactive. Which platform will better support your hotel’s growth?
Ascon’s limited visibility and zero reviews make it hard to assess its reliability or support quality, whereas Mews’s active ecosystem and extensive reviews provide confidence. Are you comfortable choosing a system with no proven track record or recent user feedback?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with proven market presence, go with Mews. Its 758 reviews in the last six months, a 4.62/5 rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend demonstrate widespread satisfaction across various hotel segments, especially boutique and city hotels.
If your hotel requires a basic, perhaps niche solution with no recent updates or active community, Ascon might be an option—though its lack of reviews and ratings suggest otherwise. For most hotels, Mews’s proven track record and comprehensive ecosystem make it the clear choice.
Mews’s user rating for ease of use sits at an impressive 4.7/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, real-time updates, and straightforward onboarding. Customers highlight how quickly staff can adopt Mews, reducing training time and operational friction.
Ascon provides no current ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge usability or onboarding success. Given Mews’s high score and active feedback, it’s the safer bet for a hotel seeking a user-friendly platform.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online check-in, guest CRM, integrated CRS, mobile apps, and extensive automation tools. Its integrated marketplace with over 1,000 third-party apps offers unparalleled flexibility.
Ascon shows no listed features or integrations, leaving its capabilities unknown. The clear advantage goes to Mews, which provides a full suite of tools that support modern hotel operations and guest experience enhancements.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores are solid at 4.27/5, with recent reviews indicating prompt, helpful assistance and ongoing platform improvements. Customers mention that support is responsive, with a focus on quick issue resolution.
Ascon has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality or responsiveness. Given Mews’s active support community and recent positive feedback, it’s the safer choice for reliable assistance.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and POS systems. Its open API and extensive marketplace enable seamless connectivity with industry-standard solutions.
Ascon has zero verified integrations, greatly limiting its utility in a multi-platform environment. For hotels seeking flexibility and a broad tech ecosystem, Mews’s integrations are unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews and high NPS score (9.12/10) reflect strong hotelier satisfaction across various property types, especially boutique hotels and independent properties. Its 4.62/5 rating and 93% recommendation rate underscore consistent positive experiences.
Ascon has no recent reviews, ratings, or hoteliers’ feedback available. Without current data, confidence in Ascon’s performance remains speculative.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing begins at $900/month, with no free tier or trial, and includes a comprehensive suite of features. Ascon provides no pricing information, making it impossible to evaluate its value or compare costs.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and extensive features, it offers a clear value proposition. With no data on Ascon’s costs, Mews’s offering appears more accessible and predictable.
Not ideal if your hotel values extensive automation, integrations, or proven support, as Ascon’s capabilities are unverified and no recent user feedback exists.
Not ideal if your property is very small, budget-focused, or in regions where Mews’s support isn’t yet established—though recent reviews suggest broad applicability.
Mews stands out as the leading option, with a proven track record, active community, and extensive feature set tailored for modern hospitality. Ascon’s lack of recent data and reviews make it a risky choice, especially when reliable support and proven functionality matter.
Choose Mews if your hotel values a scalable, flexible system backed by recent customer feedback, strong integrations, and ongoing innovation. Opt for Ascon only if you’re exploring very basic management tools without the need for support or proven market performance.
If your hotel needs a reliable, full-featured PMS that can grow with you, Mews is the clear winner. For minimal or experimental needs, Ascon offers no current evidence to justify a decision.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Ascon |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Ascon et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Ascon et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Ascon propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Ascon : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Ascon a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits