The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Assa Abloy se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Assa Abloy apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel operations and guest experiences. Both Assa Abloy and Mews aim to address operational inefficiencies, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. Assa Abloy, a legacy brand, is virtually unreviewed and untested in the current PMS landscape, whereas Mews offers a modern, cloud-based platform with hundreds of recent reviews. Will you entrust your hotel to a largely untested system or opt for a proven solution with robust user feedback?
Assa Abloy, traditionally known for locks and access control, has entered the PMS space but with no reviews or clear user feedback, making it impossible to gauge real-world performance. Mews, on the other hand, boasts over 750 recent reviews with a stellar overall rating of 4.62/5 and a high likelihood to recommend (93%). The recent reviews for Mews highlight its ease of use, extensive integrations, and operational automation, whereas Assa Abloy remains largely untested in this market segment.
While Assa Abloy’s offering might be rooted in physical security, its lack of recent user feedback leaves hoteliers uncertain about its effectiveness or adaptability. Mews’s proven track record demonstrates consistent customer satisfaction across diverse property types. Are you willing to gamble on an unproven legacy brand, or do you prefer a platform with validated success and ongoing innovation?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich, cloud-based PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. It is especially suited for independent hotels, boutique properties, hostels, and chains looking for automation, real-time data, and guest-centric tools. Conversely, if your hotel primarily seeks a legacy, security-focused solution with a focus on physical access, Assa Abloy might seem appealing — but the lack of recent reviews and proven functionality makes this risky.
For hotels prioritizing ease of management, guest satisfaction, and operational scalability, Mews provides a clear advantage with its 59 unique features, extensive support, and continuous updates. Assa Abloy’s absence of review data and unclear feature set make it a less reliable choice for modern hotel management. Which platform aligns with your hotel’s growth and innovation goals?
Mews consistently receives high praise for its user-friendly interface, earning a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 98 recent reviews. Hotels describe it as intuitive, with a modern design that minimizes training time, and staff often note that they can operate the system with minimal onboarding. Assa Abloy, devoid of reviews, offers no comparable user feedback or usability ratings, leaving its ease of use highly uncertain.
Mews also scores well on onboarding, with many users highlighting smooth implementation and ongoing support. In contrast, Assa Abloy’s lack of recent feedback means you cannot gauge how easily your team would adopt its system. Edge: Mews.
Mews provides 59 integrations and features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, flexible booking engine, online check-in, automated reminders, and detailed reporting—features critical for modern hospitality. Assa Abloy offers no listed features or integrations, raising questions about its capabilities outside physical access control.
The extensive feature set of Mews supports a fully digital, guest-centric operation, while Assa Abloy’s offering appears limited to basic or physical security functions. For comprehensive operational management, Mews clearly leads. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings include a 4.27/5 score based on recent reviews, with users praising their responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Many mention that support is a key factor in their positive experience, even when encountering minor bugs, which are typically addressed quickly.
Assa Abloy does not provide recent review data or specific support feedback, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Given Mews’s established reputation for customer service, it’s the safer choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including over 1,000 through its marketplace, with notable partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. These integrations cover revenue management, PMS, channel management, POS, guest communication, and more.
Assa Abloy has only one verified partner listed, which is insufficient for a modern hotel operation that relies on a connected tech ecosystem. For flexibility and scale, Mews stands far ahead. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews show an overall rating of 4.62/5, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, based on 98 reviews in the last six months. Hoteliers across segments—boutique, city center, hostel, and chain hotels—praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Assa Abloy, lacking reviews, cannot be rated. Its unproven status in the hotel PMS market makes Mews the clear favorite for hoteliers seeking validated satisfaction and ongoing updates. Edge: Mews.
Assa Abloy’s pricing details are not publicly available, and there’s no indication of a trial or transparent fee structure. Mews charges a flat monthly fee of $900, with no implementation or additional costs listed.
The opaque pricing of Assa Abloy makes budgeting difficult, while Mews’s transparent model allows hotels to plan more effectively. Given the lack of data for Assa Abloy, Mews offers a clearer value proposition.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews offers a comprehensive, cloud-native PMS with broad integrations, proven user satisfaction, and continuous innovation. It supports operational agility and enhances guest experiences, making it ideal for the modern hotel.
Assa Abloy, largely untested in this space, might serve niche physical security needs but lacks the features, support, and user feedback to make it a reliable PMS choice. For scalable growth, automation, and a digital-first approach, Mews is the clear winner.
When to choose Mews:
When to consider Assa Abloy:
Conclusion:
For most hotels seeking a modern, reliable, and scalable PMS, Mews stands out as the smarter choice backed by recent reviews and extensive features. Assa Abloy remains unproven, and its lack of current user feedback makes it a risky gamble for your hotel’s future.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Assa Abloy |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Assa Abloy et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Assa Abloy et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Assa Abloy propose 1 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Assa Abloy : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Assa Abloy a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits