The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Septeo Hospitality se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Spa & Wellness Module.
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Septeo Hospitality apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
You’re weighing between ASTERIO by Septeo Hospitality and Mews PMS to manage your hotel operations. Both aim to streamline your processes, but they diverge significantly in scale, usability, and overall market presence. Which platform will truly meet your hotel’s needs today and as you grow?
ASTERIO promotes itself as an all-in-one solution for diverse hotel activities beyond traditional PMS functions, while Mews focuses on automation, integrations, and guest experience improvements. Are you looking for a flexible, hotel-specific PMS or a broader operational tool with extensive third-party support?
ASTERIO positions itself as a comprehensive management tool for multiple hotel services, including accommodation, food, spa, shop, and activities, with a focus on developing customer experiences and revenues. However, it has no public ratings or recent reviews, which raises questions about its actual performance and user satisfaction.
In contrast, Mews boasts over 758 reviews, with 98 recent ones in the last six months, reflecting active use and ongoing customer feedback. Its 4.62/5 overall rating and 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating are backed by a broad user base, especially in North America and Europe, indicating a proven track record. Given the recent reviews and high Net Promoter Score of 9.12/10, Mews demonstrates a vibrant, supported platform.
Are you prioritizing a tried-and-tested system with extensive community insights, or exploring a newer, less validated solution?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based, scalable PMS with exceptional automation, integrations, and a focus on guest experience, go with Mews. Its extensive third-party ecosystem, over 336 verified integrations, and a proven track record across diverse hotel segments make it the safer, more adaptable choice.
If your hotel requires a highly specialized management system for multiple services like wellness, shops, and activities, and you’re willing to navigate limited reviews and unknown performance, ASTERIO could be considered. However, the absence of recent user feedback and a lower support structure suggest caution.
For hotels in North America or those prioritizing rapid onboarding, proven scalability, and ongoing support, Mews is the clear winner.
Mews receives a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 98 recent reviews, with users praising its modern, intuitive interface and quick setup. Customers highlight how effortless it is to onboard staff, with some saying, “It’s very user-friendly, and staff adapt quickly,” which minimizes training time.
In contrast, ASTERIO has no publicly available ratings or recent reviews, making it difficult to assess its ease of use. Its focus on broad functionalities suggests a potentially steeper learning curve, especially without recent user feedback to confirm its simplicity.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 43 shared features, including automation, guest profiles, integrated payments, housekeeping apps, and advanced revenue management tools. It also provides a broad ecosystem of over 336 integrations, including channel managers, POS, and CRM systems.
ASTERIO claims a single unique feature: a Spa & Wellness Module, and positions itself as an all-encompassing platform for multiple hotel activities. However, it lacks the extensive feature set and third-party ecosystem that Mews provides, with only 13 verified partners.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is highly rated for customer support, with a 4.27/5 rating and recent reviews praising its responsiveness: “Their support team sets new standards,” and “Support has improved markedly over time.” Onboarding experiences are generally positive, with many customers citing quick and helpful setup.
For ASTERIO, no recent reviews or ratings are available, making it difficult to gauge support quality or onboarding effectiveness. Its smaller scale and lack of active feedback suggest it may not match Mews’s support standards.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, D-Edge, and Qualitelis. Its expansive marketplace supports over 1,000 third-party applications, allowing extensive customization and automation.
ASTERIO has only 13 verified partner integrations, limiting its connectivity options. Its narrower ecosystem may restrict your ability to automate workflows or connect with essential hotel tech.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 and recent reviews from a broad range of property types—boutiques, resorts, city hotels—highlight strong user satisfaction. Notable comments include “Mews makes everything much easier” and “It’s the most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market.”
With no recent reviews or ratings for ASTERIO, it’s impossible to gauge how hotelier perceptions compare. The lack of feedback suggests it’s not yet a trusted or widely adopted solution.
Edge: Mews.
Mews pricing starts at $900/month with no trial or freemium options, positioning it as a mid-range investment with a clear subscription model. The platform’s value derives from its extensive features, integrations, and support.
ASTERIO does not publicly disclose pricing details or trial options, making cost comparisons difficult. Its value proposition and pricing are unclear, which could pose risks for budget-conscious hotels.
Mews offers a proven, scalable cloud PMS with a broad ecosystem, rich automation, and high-rated support, making it suitable for hotels looking to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Its recent reviews confirm its ongoing innovation and trusted performance.
ASTERIO emphasizes multi-service management, but its lack of recent user feedback, limited integrations, and support make it a riskier choice for hotels seeking reliability and proven results. Its niche focus may appeal to specific multi-activity properties, but caution is advised.
If your hotel values a mature, well-supported PMS with extensive integrations, go with Mews. If you operate a multi-activity hotel willing to navigate an untested platform, ASTERIO might be worth exploring. But for most hoteliers, Mews remains the safer, smarter choice.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) et Mews PMS partagent 43 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Assistance en ligne 24h/24 et 7j/7 | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Module Spa & Bien-être | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 5 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) propose 13 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Septeo Hospitality a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits