The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Athena se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Athena apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Athena |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. Athena by Athena and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME are two options that aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ greatly in market presence, features, and user feedback. Your decision hinges on which product aligns better with your property's size, complexity, and growth plans.
Athena offers an AI-driven revenue management approach but lacks recent reviews and active user feedback, making it difficult to assess its current performance. HotelTime PMS, with over 430 recent reviews and a 4.83/5 overall rating, provides a clearer picture of its effectiveness and customer satisfaction. Do you prioritize proven, widely adopted solutions or an emerging platform with innovative features?
Athena aims to provide an all-in-one AI-powered revenue management tool that automates complex pricing strategies and optimizes profitability. HotelTime PMS, on the other hand, addresses a broad scope of hotel operations with a comprehensive set of features, including reservations, billing, and integrations.
While Athena focuses primarily on revenue optimization through advanced algorithms, its lack of recent reviews and engagement suggests it may not be the best choice for hotels seeking immediate, proven results. Conversely, HotelTime’s recent reviews reveal strong user satisfaction for operational management, customer support, and extensive integrations. Could your hotel benefit more from a system with tangible, well-documented performance?
If your hotel needs an established, feature-rich platform capable of handling complex operations and integrations, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. It suits properties of all sizes, from boutique hotels to resorts, and boasts over 430 recent reviews—indicating a mature, well-supported product.
If your team is looking for an AI-driven revenue management tool with innovative automation, Athena might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, it’s difficult to verify real-world effectiveness. For most hoteliers, a proven, highly-rated solution like HotelTime PMS offers more immediate, reliable value.
HotelTime PMS’s user interface scores 4.66/5, and reviewers frequently praise its intuitive design and ease of onboarding. Support staff are highly responsive, with a 4.73/5 rating, and many users appreciate the detailed onboarding process that helps staff adapt quickly.
Athena, with a 0/5 ease-of-use score, offers no recent user feedback, but its focus on AI suggests a potentially steep learning curve and a lack of proven onboarding success. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS offers 51 unique features, including integrated CRS, POS, guest CRM, mobile check-in, automated night audits, and extensive reporting tools. Athena, however, has no listed features or integrations, focusing solely on AI-based revenue optimization.
Given the breadth of features and integrations, HotelTime PMS provides a more comprehensive operational toolkit. Athena’s niche focus on AI revenue management might be valuable for large, revenue-driven properties but lacks the versatility needed for day-to-day management. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s support is consistently rated 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, thorough onboarding, and ongoing assistance. Customers appreciate the support team’s responsiveness, often describing them as knowledgeable and helpful.
In contrast, Athena has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess its current customer service quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel operations, HotelTime’s proven track record gives it a definitive edge. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS connects with 58 verified partners, including channel managers, POS systems, and third-party applications like Profitroom and STR. It offers extensive integration options, facilitating seamless data exchange across hotel functions.
Athena, with zero verified partners, provides no information on integrations, limiting its appeal for hotels requiring a flexible, interconnected tech stack. For scalability and operational flexibility, HotelTime PMS is the clear winner. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS enjoys a 4.83/5 overall rating based on 433 recent reviews, with properties across segments like resorts, boutique hotels, and city-center hotels expressing high satisfaction. Smaller and larger properties alike praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Athena, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, cannot be rated. Given the substantial recent reviews and high scores, HotelTime PMS has proven its value among a wide range of properties. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS charges $600 per month with no setup fees or trials available. Athena does not list pricing details, making cost comparisons impossible.
The transparent pricing of HotelTime provides clarity for budgeting, while Athena’s undisclosed costs leave potential buyers uncertain about value and affordability.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that HotelTime PMS is an established, fully-featured platform trusted by over 650 properties across multiple countries, with a strong track record of support and integrations. Athena, while promising as an AI revenue management tool, currently lacks recent user feedback and proven operational capabilities.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable PMS with extensive features and integrations, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. Its recent 4.83/5 rating and nearly 430 reviews underscore its ability to meet diverse hotel needs effectively.
For properties focused solely on innovative revenue optimization and willing to take a chance on a less proven platform, Athena might appeal. But for most hoteliers, the proven track record of HotelTime PMS outweighs Athena’s AI promise at this stage.
In summary, go with HotelTime PMS if you want a trusted, all-in-one solution that’s actively evolving and well-supported. Consider Athena only if your operation is highly sophisticated, revenue-centric, and you’re prepared for a less tested platform.
This comparison is based on the latest available review data, product features, and market presence as of October 2023.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Athena |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Athena et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Athena et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Athena propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Athena : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Athena a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits