The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Athena se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Athena apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Athena |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) can feel overwhelming, especially when evaluating two leading options like Athena by Athena and Mews PMS by Mews. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in capabilities, user experience, and market presence. Your team needs a solution that not only solves your immediate operational challenges but also scales with your hotel’s growth.
Given the recent reviews and the sheer volume of user feedback, Mews PMS stands out as the more proven and well-supported platform. Are you ready to prioritize a system with extensive real-world validation?
Athena by Athena offers a broad AI-powered revenue management tool, designed to optimize pricing and profitability through advanced algorithms. However, with no recent reviews or ratings, its effectiveness and user satisfaction remain uncertain compared to Mews.
Mews PMS, on the other hand, has over 750 reviews in the past six months alone, with a 4.62-star rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Its ease of use, customer support, and feature richness are consistently praised. Does your hotel need a system backed by recent, high-volume user feedback?
If your hotel needs a flexible, highly integrated PMS that supports automation, extensive third-party integrations, and a scalable cloud platform, go with Mews. Its broad feature set (over 59 unique functionalities) and proven track record make it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels, boutique properties, and multi-property groups.
If your team is focused solely on revenue automation and AI-driven pricing without a need for extensive integrations or operational automation, Athena might seem appealing. But, with no recent reviews or active user base, it’s a riskier choice for hotels seeking reliable, ongoing support and proven functionality.
Mews boasts a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews, with users praising its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Many hotel staff mention that even non-technical users find it simple to navigate, with quick setup and minimal training required.
Athena, however, has no recent review data or user feedback available, leaving its usability and onboarding experience uncertain. Without recent user validation, it’s difficult to recommend Athena as the easier system to adopt.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a comprehensive set of over 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management modules, booking engine, guest CRM, mobile check-in, integrated POS, automation tools, and advanced reporting. Many features that are essential for modern hotels are included, with continuous updates driven by user feedback.
Athena provides no documented features or third-party integrations, focusing mainly on AI-powered revenue management. Its lack of detailed functionality and recent feature rollout data makes it difficult to compare directly, but clearly, Mews has a more complete and versatile feature set.
Edge: Mews.
Mews consistently receives high marks for customer support, with a 4.27/5 rating and recent reviews praising its quick responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Clients mention that the support team is helpful, with 24/7 availability and effective problem resolution.
Athena has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality. Given Mews’s strong recent support reputation, it’s the safer choice for hotel teams that prioritize reliable assistance.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular channels, POS systems, revenue tools, and more. Its open API and extensive marketplace empower hotels to customize their tech ecosystem with over 1,000 available third-party apps.
Athena has no verified partners or integrations listed. For hotels that rely on a connected tech stack, Mews’s robust ecosystem provides a clear advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent ratings reflect a 4.62/5 overall score from 758 reviews, with the most recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, support, and feature depth. Hotel segments such as boutique hotels, independents, and city-center properties all rate Mews highly, with many reviews emphasizing operational efficiency and guest experience improvements.
Athena’s ratings are nonexistent, but the lack of recent reviews indicates minimal current user engagement. For hoteliers seeking validated, current user satisfaction, Mews dominates.
Edge: Mews.
Mews costs $900 monthly as a base price, with no freemium or tiered pricing detailed. Athena’s pricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to compare value directly.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven ROI through customer feedback, it offers better cost clarity and perceived value. Athena’s unclear cost structure adds risk to your decision-making.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a well-established, highly-rated platform with a proven track record evidenced by over 750 recent reviews. Its comprehensive feature set, extensive integrations, and responsive support make it a safe choice for modern hotels aiming for operational excellence and growth.
Athena offers an AI-powered revenue management focus but lacks recent validation, user feedback, and a broad ecosystem. Its limited information and unproven market presence suggest it’s best suited for niche revenue optimization rather than full hotel management.
If you need a reliable, scalable PMS with current market validation, go with Mews. If your core concern is AI-driven pricing and you’re comfortable with untested platforms, Athena might be worth exploring—but be aware of the risks.
In conclusion, for most hotels today, Mews offers a more comprehensive, validated, and supported solution.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Athena |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Athena et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Athena et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Athena propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Athena : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Athena a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits