The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Beddzle se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Beddzle apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Beddzle |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Beddzle |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Beddzle |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Beddzle |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational success and guest satisfaction. While Beddzle by Beddzle claims to be an all-in-one OTA management platform, it lacks the robust features, extensive integration options, and user feedback necessary to support modern hotel operations. Mews PMS, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform backed by over 750 reviews, most recent within the last six months, with a high 4.62/5 rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Are you ready to rely on the more proven solution?
Beddzle focuses on OTA management, promising to unify reservations and streamline distribution. However, with zero reviews and no recent user feedback, its reputation and real-world effectiveness remain unverified. Mews, in contrast, has amassed over 750 reviews, with recent feedback praising its ease of use, extensive features, and seamless integrations. Its 4.62/5 overall rating and 93% recommendation rate demonstrate widespread trust among diverse hotel types.
The core difference lies in their focus: Beddzle appears to center solely on OTA relations, while Mews offers a full PMS solution that handles reservations, front desk, housekeeping, revenue management, and guest engagement. Are you seeking a narrow OTA tool or a complete hotel management platform? Given the extensive recent customer validation, Mews is clearly the stronger choice.
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable PMS capable of supporting multi-property management, automation, and guest experience enhancements, go with Mews. Its features include a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, integrated payments, and over 300 third-party integrations—perfect for mid-sized and large hotels. If, however, your focus is solely on OTA distribution without requiring a comprehensive management system, Beddzle might seem appealing—but with no recent reviews, its real-world performance is unproven.
For boutique hotels, resorts, and chains aiming to grow efficiently and deliver consistent guest experiences, Mews’ proven track record and expansive feature set make it the clear choice. If your hotel prioritizes operational control, data-driven insights, and guest engagement, Mews is the superior platform.
Mews has a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on nearly 100 recent reviews, with users describing its intuitive interface, modern design, and straightforward onboarding. Many praise its mobile-friendly platform, with staff adopting Mews quickly and seamlessly integrating it into daily routines. In contrast, Beddzle's usability is unverified—no reviews or ratings exist, leaving its ease of implementation and staff adoption uncertain.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, automation tools, housekeeping modules, native apps, and extensive reporting. Beddzle offers no distinct features or integrations, focusing primarily on OTA management, with no advanced capabilities documented.
Given its wide array of functionalities designed for operational control and guest experience, Mews provides a more complete hotel management solution. Its ability to adapt across property types—luxury, boutique, hostels, and chains—sets it apart.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’ support scores 4.27/5, with recent reviews highlighting responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive assistance during implementation and ongoing use. Many users note quick resolutions to bugs and support requests, especially given the platform’s frequent updates and improvements. Beddzle, with no reviews or support ratings available, offers no evidence of customer service quality or responsiveness.
Edge: Mews.
Mews provides over 336 verified integrations, including channel managers, payment processors, POS systems, CRS, and revenue tools. Its open API and extensive marketplace support seamless connectivity with third-party software, allowing customization and operational flexibility. Beddzle has no verified integration partners or marketplace, limiting its ability to adapt to your existing tech ecosystem.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’ recent reviews reflect high satisfaction across hotel segments, with a 4.64/5 average score from nearly 680 reviews, and a 4.91/5 from independent hotels alone. Boutique hotels, chains, and hostels praise its ease of use, automation, and support. Beddzle’s lack of reviews prevents any meaningful comparison, but the absence of recent feedback suggests it is not yet trusted or proven in the market.
Edge: Mews.
Beddzle does not publicly share pricing details, implying a custom quote or a possibly unestablished pricing model. Mews charges a starting fee of around $900/month, with no implementation fees, offering transparent, subscription-based pricing flexible for different hotel sizes. Given the proven value, Mews’ pricing aligns with its extensive feature set and support.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a proven, feature-rich PMS that supports modern hospitality operations through automation, integrations, and guest engagement tools. It is highly rated, with recent reviews attesting to its ease of use, support, and adaptability, making it the ideal choice for hotels seeking growth and efficiency. Beddzle remains unverified and limited to OTA management, unsuitable for hotels that need a complete management system.
Choose Mews if your goal is operational excellence, guest satisfaction, and future-proofing your property. If your needs are purely distribution and your hotel is small with minimal management complexity, Beddzle might suffice—but beware of the lack of recent performance data. For most hotels aiming for scale and sophistication, Mews is the clear winner.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Beddzle |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Beddzle et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Beddzle |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Beddzle et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Beddzle propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Beddzle : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Beddzle a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits