The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Mews PMS boils down to your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations but serve very different market segments and operational scales. BOCS is a comprehensive property management system tailored for real estate firms and multi-property portfolios, whereas Mews is a cloud-based hotel management platform praised for its ease of use and flexible integrations. Are you seeking a system optimized for property management or hospitality operations?
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES provides an extensive suite of tools designed for property and asset management, especially in real estate and multi-property portfolios. Its strengths are in managing leasing, tenant interactions, and financial transactions, supporting complex property operations. Conversely, Mews is built specifically for hotels, focusing on guest experiences, reservations, and operational automation, with a user-friendly interface. Do your hotel’s priorities lean towards property management or guest-centric hospitality?
The key divergence is that BOCS’s system offers comprehensive property oversight, while Mews emphasizes guest journey automation and operational efficiency. Mews's recent review count (758 reviews) and high score (4.62/5) demonstrate a broad, current user base and strong satisfaction. BOCS’s ratings, however, are not available, indicating limited or no recent feedback. Would your team benefit more from managing properties or enhancing guest experiences?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-native platform capable of automating guest interactions, reservations, and revenue management, Mews is the clear choice. It’s suitable for boutique hotels, resorts, and larger properties seeking scale, with a 93% likelihood to recommend and highly positive recent reviews. If your hotel or management company requires a system for extensive property portfolios, tenant management, and complex financial workflows, BOCS’s system might be more aligned—though its current user feedback is nonexistent.
For independent hotels and properties prioritizing guest experience, automation, and integrations, Mews’s 59 unique features, over 336 integrations, and high user ratings make it the superior option. BOCS’s niche focus on property management for real estate is less relevant for hotel operations. Which operational model aligns with your hotel’s growth strategy?
Mews’s 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating and recent reviews emphasize its intuitive, modern interface, and straightforward onboarding process—hotels report quick setup and staff adoption. Many users highlight the platform’s user-friendly design, with reviews praising its ease of navigation and minimal training requirements. BOCS, however, has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to assess current user experience.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive array of features tailored to hospitality, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, online booking, guest CRM, mobile check-in, digital registration, automated housekeeping, and integrations with over 336 third-party systems. It’s designed to handle everything from guest communication to revenue management, with 59 unique features. BOCS’s system, by contrast, provides zero listed features, indicating it’s more of a broad property management solution without specific hospitality tools.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts a 4.27/5 support rating, with recent reviews praising its quick, helpful responses and dedicated onboarding. Users describe their support as proactive and efficient, especially during implementation. BOCS’s support experience, however, is not documented publicly, with no recent reviews to gauge responsiveness or quality.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s ecosystem includes over 336 verified integrations, connecting with channel managers, revenue tools, POS systems, and more. It supports a broad array of third-party partners, allowing hotels to customize their tech stack. BOCS does not list any integrations, indicating limited connectivity options beyond its core functionalities.
Edge: Mews.
With 758 recent reviews, Mews has a 4.62/5 overall rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend, reflecting widespread, current satisfaction across various hotel segments, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and city hotels. BOCS’s ratings are unavailable, but the lack of recent reviews suggests less user engagement or fewer hotel clients.
Edge: Mews.
Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no mention of implementation or setup costs. BOCS’s pricing details are not publicly available; it appears to operate on a bespoke or enterprise model, making direct comparisons difficult. For budget-conscious hotels, Mews’s transparent pricing offers clarity, whereas BOCS may require direct vendor negotiation.
Mews is a highly-rated, user-friendly platform suited for modern hotels looking to automate operations, improve guest satisfaction, and expand integrations. Its extensive feature set and recent positive reviews make it the clear winner for most hoteliers aiming for operational excellence.
BOCS, with its specialized focus on property and asset management for real estate, is less relevant for typical hotel operations. Its lack of recent feedback and features suggests it’s better suited for property managers or real estate firms rather than hotel teams.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a flexible, scalable, guest-centric system. Opt for BOCS if your primary goal is managing large property portfolios and tenant relations, though it may require more custom development and lacks recent user validation.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits