The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,414 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
BookingCenter se distingue .
Cloudbeds se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.5/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
Notes comparees basees sur 1,414 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 1,414 |
Apres analyse de 1,414 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de BookingCenter apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Cloudbeds mettent en avant intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
Conversion de devises et opérations financières
▾
|
|
|
−
Fonctionnalités mobiles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 675 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 235 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 51 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #4 5 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 546 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 245 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 145 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 96 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #2 532 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 166 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #3 201 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #3 13 avis |
When choosing a hotel management platform, your goal is to find a solution that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and offers reliable support. BookingCenter by BookingCenter and Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds both aim to meet these needs but diverge significantly in scope, features, and market presence. While BookingCenter claims to streamline property and distribution management, Cloudbeds provides a more integrated, feature-rich platform backed by a larger user base and more recent reviews. Which aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans?
BookingCenter has been around since 2000, focusing on desktop and web-based property management with integrated GDS and OTA channels. However, it has zero reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, making its current credibility questionable. Conversely, Cloudbeds, founded in 2012, boasts 1,219 recent reviews (76 in the last six months), a 4.62/5 rating, and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its customer satisfaction scores—ease of use, support, and value—far outperform BookingCenter, indicating a more reliable and user-approved solution.
The core difference is that BookingCenter offers a standalone PMS and channel management setup, while Cloudbeds delivers a comprehensive, all-in-one hospitality platform with extensive integrations. With limited data on BookingCenter, can you confidently rely on its capabilities? Cloudbeds’ recent reviews suggest it’s the clearer choice for hotels seeking proven performance and ongoing support.
If your hotel needs a straightforward PMS with basic reservation and distribution features, BookingCenter might seem suitable—especially if you’re an independent property that prefers desktop management. Yet, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, it’s hard to confirm its current effectiveness or support quality.
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform that unifies operations, distribution, revenue management, and guest engagement, Cloudbeds is the obvious winner. Its 1,219 reviews and 4.62/5 rating reflect high satisfaction across diverse hotel types, from boutique to large resorts, making it the better choice for growth-oriented hotels seeking reliability and ongoing innovation.
BookingCenter’s usability is impossible to evaluate due to zero reviews and no recent customer feedback, leaving its interface and onboarding experience unverified. In contrast, Cloudbeds enjoys a 4.58/5 ease-of-use rating, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding (rated 4.41/5), and minimal training requirements.
Recent reviews highlight that staff find Cloudbeds’ system straightforward, with many noting that even non-technical team members adapt quickly. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter provides core PMS functions, central reservation, and GDS integration, but offers no detailed feature count or recent user insights. Cloudbeds, on the other hand, boasts 90 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, 2-way real-time integrations, multi-lingual support, revenue management, automated reporting, online check-in, guest messaging, and more.
While BookingCenter appears limited in scope, Cloudbeds delivers a broad suite capable of handling complex operations for diverse property types. Edge: Cloudbeds.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for BookingCenter support, leaving its service quality unverified. Cloudbeds, with a 4.38/5 customer support rating, receives frequent praise for its responsive, friendly, and helpful assistance—users describe their support as “excellent” and “quick to respond,” highlighting its reliability.
Given the recent positive feedback, Cloudbeds’ support system is clearly stronger and more dependable. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter’s integration count is limited to just 2 verified partners, including Airbnb, with only one shared partner. Cloudbeds outpaces this dramatically, with 190 verified integrations, including Airbnb, and unique partners like AdsHotel, Trevo, and Umi Digital.
This extensive integration ecosystem enables smoother operations and reduces manual work for your team. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter lacks recent reviews, ratings, or hotel segment data, rendering comparison impossible. Cloudbeds, however, is highly rated across hotel segments, with a 4.54/5 score from independent hotels, 4.63/5 from boutique hotels, and a 4.17/5 from smaller independent properties.
Recent reviews consistently praise Cloudbeds’ ease of use, reliability, and support. Its high ratings across varied hotel types demonstrate broad satisfaction, reinforcing its status as a trusted solution. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter does not publicly disclose pricing or offer a trial, indicating either custom quotes or limited transparency. Cloudbeds charges a starting price of $500 per month, with no free tier or trial, but many users see it as offering good value given its extensive features.
If budget predictability and transparency matter, Cloudbeds’ clear pricing helps inform decision-making. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if you want a platform with modern features, broad integrations, or scalable growth options. Limited user feedback makes it risky for properties aiming to expand or modernize.
Not ideal if your property is very small with minimal tech needs or if you prefer traditional desktop-only software without cloud features.
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with proven user satisfaction, extensive features, and a vast ecosystem of integrations. It is suitable for hotels seeking to automate, scale, and enhance guest experiences, demonstrated by its high ratings and recent positive reviews.
BookingCenter may appeal to very small properties or those with minimal tech needs, but its lack of recent reviews and limited features make it a less reliable choice for most hotels aiming for growth or modernization. For a proven, feature-rich, and well-supported solution, Cloudbeds is the clear winner.
This detailed comparison aims to guide your decision-making process by aligning your hotel’s needs with the strengths of each platform. Based on current data, Cloudbeds emerges as the more reliable and versatile choice for modern hospitality operations.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, BookingCenter et Cloudbeds HMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Connectivité PMS | ||
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Gestion de l'inventaire | ||
| Intégrations bidirectionnelles en temps réel | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Tableau de bord analytique |
Affichage des principales differences. 78 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont si... Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont signalé des écarts qui impactent les processus de rapprochement. Des configurations améliorées pour la conversion des devises pourraient simplifier la gestion financière.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. BookingCenter et Cloudbeds HMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. BookingCenter propose 2 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Cloudbeds HMS en propose 189. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Cloudbeds HMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
BookingCenter : Non. Cloudbeds HMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. BookingCenter a un HT Score de 0 et Cloudbeds a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits