The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Bookinglayer se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Bookinglayer apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Bookinglayer by Bookinglayer and HOTELTIME PMS by HOTELTIME are two options that aim to streamline your processes, but they serve different needs and markets. Your challenge lies in selecting the platform that best aligns with your property’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
Bookinglayer targets businesses with combined activity and accommodation bookings, focusing on adventure, wellness, and niche markets. HOTELTIME, meanwhile, offers a more comprehensive, scalable PMS designed for properties of all sizes, including large resorts and chains. Which platform will meet your needs more effectively?
Bookinglayer and HOTELTIME address core hotel management challenges—reservation handling, customer communication, and revenue management—but they diverge in scope and depth. Bookinglayer excels at managing complex activity packages, upselling, and integrations tailored for adventure and activity-focused businesses, with a clear focus on selling experience-based packages.
HOTELTIME provides a broad set of features, including POS, housekeeping, spa management, and extensive reporting, making it suitable for large hotels or hotel groups seeking an all-in-one solution. With more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, HOTELTIME demonstrates a proven track record of satisfying diverse hotel needs. Do you need a system focused on activity bookings or a full-service hotel PMS?
If your hotel mainly offers combined accommodation and activity packages, such as surf camps, wellness retreats, or adventure tours, Bookinglayer is the ideal fit. Its platform simplifies selling multi-activity packages and reduces admin time, with features like custom add-ons and integrated payments.
Conversely, if you operate a larger property or a hotel group requiring extensive operational tools, HOTELTIME is the stronger choice. Its modules for POS, spa, revenue management, and real-time reporting cater to complex, multi-department workflows. For hotels prioritizing scalability and a broader feature set, HOTELTIME is the more suitable option.
Based on review scores, HOTELTIME scores 4.66 out of 5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Multiple users also highlight HOTELTIME’s user-friendly design, noting that staff adopt the system quickly and efficiently.
Bookinglayer, however, scores 0/5 in ease of use, reflecting limited review data and potential usability challenges. Given the more recent and plentiful reviews, HOTELTIME clearly offers a smoother, more familiar experience for your team. Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME boasts 32 unique features not found in Bookinglayer, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, online checkout, automated night audit, revenue management modules, and a mobile app. It also offers extensive integrations with third-party systems and modules for spa, housekeeping, and employee messaging.
Bookinglayer has only 1 feature exclusive to it: guest communication via SMS messaging, mainly suited for activity-based businesses. With nearly double the number of specialized features, HOTELTIME provides a more comprehensive toolkit. Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME’s reviews frequently mention responsive, knowledgeable support and detailed onboarding, with an average support rating of 4.73 out of 5. Users appreciate their quick responses and ongoing assistance, which helps optimize the platform’s use.
In contrast, Bookinglayer lacks sufficient review data, but the absence of recent feedback and its lower overall rating imply less confidence in support quality. Given HOTELTIME’s consistent praise, edge support goes to HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME offers 58 verified integrations, including popular partners like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, covering revenue, marketing, and operational tools. It supports a broad network of third-party systems, allowing your hotel to customize its tech stack effectively.
Bookinglayer has only 1 verified integration, limiting its extensibility. For properties seeking extensive third-party connectivity, HOTELTIME’s ecosystem provides a distinct advantage. Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME enjoys an overall rating of 4.83 out of 5 based on 433 recent reviews, with a strong 93% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments—from boutique to resort—praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, emphasizing its reliability.
Bookinglayer has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. With current, high-rated feedback, HOTELTIME clearly holds a higher reputation among hoteliers. Edge: HOTELTIME.
Both platforms have a similar pricing model: a $600 monthly base fee, with no freemium options or per-room charges. There are no implementation fees or trial periods available, so budgeting should consider ongoing costs.
Since pricing is straightforward and equal, your decision should focus on features and support rather than cost differences.
Bookinglayer’s niche focus makes it best for experience-centric, activity-heavy hotels.
HOTELTIME’s versatility suits hotels seeking a comprehensive management platform.
Bookinglayer offers a specialized solution for activity-based businesses, with a focus on booking complex packages and customer communication. Its limited feature set and support data make it suitable for niche markets but less ideal for large or multi-department operations.
HOTELTIME provides a broader, more scalable platform with over 650 properties worldwide, supporting diverse hotel needs with extensive modules, integrations, and excellent support. Its recent reviews highlight high satisfaction and ease of use, making it the preferable choice for most hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes a full-service PMS with robust features, HOTELTIME stands out as the clear leader. Its extensive ecosystem, high review scores, and proven track record make it the better investment for scalable growth.
If you operate a small, activity-focused property and need a simple booking solution, Bookinglayer might serve you well, but be aware of its usability limitations and limited support data.
In summary, for most hotels looking for a reliable, feature-rich, and well-supported PMS, HOTELTIME is the recommended choice. Bookinglayer remains a niche player best suited for adventure or wellness businesses with specific booking needs.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Bookinglayer et HotelTime PMS partagent 19 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 21 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Bookinglayer et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Bookinglayer propose 1 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Bookinglayer : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Bookinglayer a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits