The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Campgest se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Campgest apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Campgest |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a pivotal decision for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Campgest by Campgest and Mews PMS aim to streamline hospitality tasks, but they diverge significantly in scale, features, and market presence. Your choice hinges on whether you need an all-in-one system tailored for outdoor hospitality or a scalable, feature-rich platform designed for modern hotels.
Are you prioritizing a proven, comprehensive PMS with extensive integrations and a large user base, or are you exploring a niche solution that might still be evolving? Let’s compare these two options to see which better suits your property.
Campgest is a niche-oriented platform designed specifically for campground, RV park, and outdoor hospitality management. It promises automation for reservations, payments, and customer communication within a user-friendly interface, but it lacks a broad market presence and extensive integrations. Mews, on the other hand, is a cloud-based hotel PMS with nearly 760 reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, emphasizing automation, scalability, and a comprehensive ecosystem.
The key difference: Campgest scores a 0 in reviews and ratings, indicating no recent or substantial user feedback, while Mews boasts a high customer support rating, recent positive reviews, and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Do you want a system with proven, recent user satisfaction or one still seeking validation?
Edge: Mews.
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable PMS with robust integrations and extensive automation, go with Mews. It’s ideal for hotels seeking a system that supports growth, offers over 336 verified integrations, and has a proven track record with diverse hotel segments, including boutique, city center, and large chains.
If your focus is solely on outdoor or campground management with simple reservation needs, Campgest might seem appealing. However, given its lack of recent reviews and features, Mews’s proven capabilities make it the safer, more future-proof choice for most hotels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s user interface receives a 4.7/5 rating based on 758 reviews, with hotel staff describing it as "modern, intuitive, and straightforward," and onboarding rated at 4.39/5. Users highlight that staff can log in remotely, with many praising the platform’s ease of adoption and quick setup.
Campgest’s usability score is 0, and there are no recent reviews to assess. Its lack of feedback suggests either minimal adoption or no active users, making it impossible to determine ease of use confidently.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, integrated CRS, automation tools, mobile app, real-time reporting, and extensive payment capabilities. Many features are designed to support dynamic hotel operations, scalability, and guest engagement, which Campgest does not claim to offer or support.
Campgest has zero proprietary features listed, indicating a minimal or undeveloped feature set. Without a comprehensive feature suite, it’s unlikely to meet the demands of a modern hotel.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s customer support ratings are 4.27/5, with recent reviews praising their responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Many users have commented that the support team's quick problem resolution and dedicated onboarding helped them adapt swiftly, even amid occasional bugs.
Campgest’s ratings are unavailable, and reviews are lacking, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. Given Mews’s established reputation and recent feedback, it’s clearly the more reliable support choice.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment processors, and revenue tools like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its vast ecosystem allows hotels to customize their tech stack extensively.
Campgest has no verified integrations listed, suggesting a limited or non-existent partner network. For a property looking to connect with third-party tools and future-proof its operations, Mews’s ecosystem is far superior.
Edge: Mews.
With 758 recent reviews, Mews hosts a high rating of 4.62/5, praised across segments like boutique hotels, city-center properties, and chains. Hoteliers consistently highlight its ease of use, automation, and scalability, with many saying, "Mews makes everything much easier."
Campgest, with zero reviews, cannot be rated. Its lack of feedback indicates uncertainty or a very limited user base, which leaves Mews as the clearly favored choice.
Edge: Mews.
Campgest’s pricing details are unavailable, indicating it might operate on a custom or undisclosed pricing model, or it may not have an active paid offering. Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no implementation fees or trial information available.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and widespread adoption, it provides predictable costs aligned with its feature-rich platform, unlike Campgest, which offers no clear financials.
Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to scale or needs advanced revenue management, extensive integrations, or sophisticated guest engagement tools.
Not ideal if your hotel only needs very basic reservation management or operates outside the typical hospitality sector, such as outdoor venues.
Mews is a full-featured, scalable PMS backed by a large user base and recent positive reviews. It features 59 tools that support modern hotel operations, from automation and integrations to guest communications and real-time reporting.
If your hotel requires a proven, adaptable, and feature-rich platform, Mews is the clear winner. It’s especially advantageous for properties looking to grow, innovate, and connect with a broad ecosystem.
Campgest, by contrast, appears limited to outdoor hospitality and lacks recent feedback or a broad feature set, making it unsuitable for most traditional hotels seeking operational excellence.
Choose Mews if you want a trusted, modern platform with extensive support and proven success. Opt for Campgest only if your specific needs are confined to outdoor hospitality and simplicity, with no plans for expansion or integration.
In conclusion, the better PMS for your hotel depends on your growth ambitions, operational complexity, and technology needs. Mews’s recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive features position it as the more reliable and comprehensive choice for most modern hotels.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Campgest |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Campgest et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Campgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Campgest et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Campgest propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Campgest : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Campgest a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits