The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
CASY Hotel Software se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de CASY Hotel Software apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between CASY Hotel Software and Mews PMS boils down to the scale of your operations, your technological needs, and your growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge sharply in market presence, features, and user feedback. While CASY’s local European focus and minimal reviews make it difficult to assess, Mews’s extensive recent data and global reach clearly favor it. Are you ready to prioritize a proven, well-supported platform?
CASY Hotel Software appears to offer a basic, possibly niche solution tailored for a specific region, with no recent reviews or visible customer ratings. Conversely, Mews boasts over 750 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.62/5 overall rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. This stark difference indicates Mews’s current dominance in hotel management solutions, especially in terms of customer satisfaction and usability.
CASY’s zero reviews and a 0/5 rating make it impossible to evaluate support, ease of use, or feature set confidently. Meanwhile, Mews’s high ratings across multiple categories—including an ease of use score of 4.7/5—provide a clearer picture of a mature, customer-centric platform. Do you want to risk your hotel’s future on an unverified solution?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable, and modern PMS with extensive integrations, go with Mews. It is ideal for hotels of all sizes seeking automation, real-time data, and broad third-party support, especially given its recent, robust reviews. If your operation is small, regional, or you’re exploring options without a clear focus on growth, CASY’s limited data and unknown features suggest a higher risk.
For independent hotels, boutique properties, and those prioritizing guest experience and operational efficiency, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer choice. CASY might appeal if you are in a niche market or have specific regional requirements, but the lack of recent reviews hampers confidence. Is your hotel prepared to take a chance on an untested system?
Mews’s UI scores a 4.7/5, with many reviews praising its modern, intuitive design that minimizes staff training time. It offers a straightforward onboarding process, with users noting rapid setup and easy day-to-day operation. CASY provides no available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its usability or onboarding experience.
Based on the data, Mews clearly leads in usability, supported by consistent positive feedback. Its cloud-based platform allows staff to work remotely, further reducing complexity. Edge: Mews.
Mews provides an impressive suite of 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online booking engine, guest CRM, integrated CRS, housekeeping modules, and advanced reporting—and it’s all built into one platform. CASY offers no listed features or unique functionalities, making comparative analysis impossible.
The extensive feature set of Mews enables it to serve comprehensive operational needs, from front desk to back office, and even guest engagement. CASY’s lack of visible features suggests it may be a limited or less sophisticated solution. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings are solid with a 4.27/5, and numerous reviews highlight its responsive, helpful customer service. Users describe the onboarding process as “smooth” and support as “quick to resolve issues,” contributing to their high satisfaction.
CASY’s customer support scores and reviews are unavailable, creating uncertainty about its service quality. Given Mews’s established support infrastructure and recent positive feedback, it offers a safer, more reliable support experience. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including over 1,000 applications via its Marketplace, covering channel management, payments, revenue management, and more. CASY has no verified partners or integrations listed, limiting its potential to connect with other hotel systems.
This extensive integration network makes Mews highly adaptable, enabling hotels to build a customized tech ecosystem that scales with their needs. CASY’s absence of integration options suggests it’s not suited for multi-system or advanced operational environments. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews and overall rating of 4.62/5 reflect widespread hotel satisfaction across segments—particularly boutique, independent, and mid-sized properties. Hotelier testimonials praise its ease of use, automation, and support, with many stating it “transformed operations” and “boosted revenue.”
CASY’s lack of reviews prevents any meaningful comparison. Without recent feedback, you cannot confidently gauge its performance or hotel satisfaction. Based on available data, Mews is clearly the more highly-rated option. Edge: Mews.
CASY’s pricing is undisclosed, with no free trial or public quotes available. Mews’s base price is $900 per month, with no implementation fees or tiered charges, making it transparent and predictable.
While Mews’s cost might be higher upfront, its value is reflected in its features, integrations, and support, which many hoteliers find justifies the investment. The absence of clear pricing for CASY complicates budget planning and comparison. Edge: Mews.
The core difference lies in maturity and scope. Mews is a cloud-native, feature-rich platform with recent, positive reviews that support its versatility and reliability. CASY, with no visible features or recent feedback, appears limited and less trustworthy.
If your hotel seeks a proven, broad solution with ongoing support and integrations, choose Mews—its large user base and recent accolades demonstrate its effectiveness. CASY might serve very small or regional operations, but the lack of recent data makes it a risky investment. For most hotels aiming for growth and operational excellence, Mews is the clear choice.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Casy et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Casy et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Casy propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Casy : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. CASY Hotel Software a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits