The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Acantech se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Acantech apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Acantech |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Chr365 by Acantech and HotelTime PMS aim to streamline hotel management, but their market presence, feature sets, and customer feedback differ significantly. Your decision hinges on the scale of your property, your need for integrations, and how recent and numerous reviews inform product reliability.
Chr365 by Acantech offers a promise of tailored solutions, but with no recent reviews or verified support data, it remains untested in current market conditions. Conversely, HotelTime PMS boasts a proven track record across hundreds of properties, with recent, detailed reviews highlighting its strengths and weaknesses. Is your hotel ready to prioritize a well-supported, extensively reviewed platform?
Both Chr365 and HotelTime aim to manage reservations, billing, and guest data; however, only HotelTime demonstrates extensive real-world validation. Acantech has no publicly available reviews or recent customer feedback, making it difficult to gauge its performance or support quality today.
HotelTime, in contrast, is trusted by over 650 properties across 20+ countries, with 433 reviews and a recent review count of 27 in the last six months. Its 4.83-star rating out of 5, backed by recent feedback, reveals consistent user satisfaction. Are you comfortable selecting a solution without recent validation, or does proven market presence matter more?
If your hotel requires a mature, feature-rich platform with extensive third-party integrations, go with HotelTime. Its 51 unique features, including POS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, and automation tools, support larger operations or those seeking comprehensive management.
If your hotel is smaller or needs a custom solution with minimal recent market validation, Chr365 might seem appealing. Yet, without recent reviews or reported support, risks increase—especially if your hotel depends on reliable software. For most hotels, the proven track record of HotelTime makes it the safer, smarter choice.
Customer feedback for Chr365 is unavailable, suggesting limited recent user experiences. HotelTime, with a 4.66/5 ease of use rating, receives praise for its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and quick staff adoption.
Reviews mention that HotelTime's interface is user-friendly, with clear navigation that minimizes training time. Users appreciate the mobile compatibility and straightforward reservation management. Edge: HotelTime.
Chr365 offers no documented features, while HotelTime boasts 51 distinct functionalities, including payment processing, online check-in, digital registration, and a housekeeping module. Its extensive suite supports multi-currency, multi-lingual options, and integrated POS.
HotelTime’s features are well-documented, reliable, and frequently praised, whereas Chr365 lacks recent validation or feature transparency. For comprehensive operational control, HotelTime’s feature set clearly outperforms. Edge: HotelTime.
There are no recent reviews or support ratings for Chr365, leaving customer support quality undetermined. HotelTime, with a 4.73/5 support rating, receives consistent praise for rapid, knowledgeable assistance and thorough onboarding.
Multiple reviews highlight that HotelTime's support team responds quickly and helps hotel staff get up to speed efficiently. This ongoing support is vital for resolving issues promptly. Edge: HotelTime.
Chr365 has no verified integration partners listed, indicating a limited or unreported integration ecosystem. HotelTime, with 58 verified partners, integrates with booking engines, revenue management tools, and third-party POS systems like AeroGuest and Profitroom.
This extensive integration capacity allows your hotel to connect various operational systems seamlessly. For interoperability and future expansion, HotelTime’s ecosystem is clearly more robust. Edge: HotelTime.
Since Chr365 has no recent reviews or ratings, it cannot be evaluated based on user feedback. HotelTime, with over 430 reviews and a recent 4.82/5 rating in the luxury segment, is highly regarded across various property types.
Hotels in the luxury, boutique, and resort segments report high satisfaction, especially praising its operational support and automation features. For a proven reputation, HotelTime clearly leads. Edge: HotelTime.
Chr365’s pricing is unavailable, suggesting it may be custom or undefined publicly. HotelTime charges a base price of $600, with no additional implementation or monthly per-room fees, making it transparent and predictable.
Given the transparent pricing and proven value, HotelTime offers clarity that Chr365 does not. If budget visibility is essential, HotelTime’s straightforward pricing is a significant advantage.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is market validation: HotelTime has a well-established reputation, with recent reviews, a large customer base, and extensive features. Chr365 remains unverified in recent market performance, making its reliability uncertain amid your hotel’s operational needs.
If your hotel demands a dependable, feature-rich platform with proven support, choose HotelTime for its extensive integrations, positive reviews, and global presence. Its recent feedback confirms its capacity to support diverse hotel types effectively.
If your hotel is smaller, highly niche, or willing to accept risk for a customized solution, Chr365 might be worth exploring—but only with thorough due diligence. The lack of recent validation makes it a less secure choice for most hotels.
For the majority of hotels prioritizing reliability, support, and extensive functionality, HotelTime stands out as the safer, more proven option. Its solid reputation and recent, positive reviews make it the recommended choice in today’s competitive hotel environment.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Acantech |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Chr365 et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Chr365 et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Chr365 propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Chr365 : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Acantech a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 91. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits