The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Acantech se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Acantech apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Acantech |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a pivotal decision for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Chr365 by Acantech and Mews PMS aim to simplify your daily tasks, but they diverge sharply in maturity, user reception, and capabilities. Is your team ready to adopt a system that’s proven to support modern hospitality or one still establishing its presence?
Chr365 offers a solution that’s less documented and reviewed, while Mews has a proven track record with over 750 recent reviews and a near-perfect rating. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions?
Chr365 by Acantech is a relatively unknown player with zero reviews and a very limited market presence, primarily serving niche or small-scale operators. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.62/5 overall rating and a 9.12/10 NPS score, reflecting broad trust and recent positive experiences from users worldwide.
While Chr365 claims to address property management needs, its lack of user feedback and absence of verified integrations or extensive feature sets make it difficult to evaluate its real-world utility. Mews, however, offers a cloud-native, feature-rich platform that streamlines operations and enhances guest experiences, proven through constant positive reviews.
Are you comfortable choosing an untested system, or do you prefer the confidence that comes with a well-reviewed leader?
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable solution with extensive integrations, choose Mews. Its ecosystem includes over 336 verified partners, supporting everything from channel management to revenue optimization, and it’s trusted by hospitality brands across the globe.
If your hotel operates on a very small scale or in a niche market where minimal features suffice, Chr365 might seem appealing — but the lack of reviews or proven performance makes this a risky choice. For any hotel seeking a mature, well-supported PMS, Mews is the clear winner.
For hoteliers prioritizing operational automation, guest engagement, and future-proofing, Mews’s extensive capabilities make it the logical pick. Chr365, lacking evidence of effectiveness or support, appears unsuitable for hotels looking to grow or modernize.
Mews scores highly for user-friendliness, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating from verified reviews. Users highlight its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding, with many noting they can set up the platform within days and train staff easily.
Chr365, on the other hand, has no publicly available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Its limited documentation and absence of user feedback suggest a less polished, less user-friendly product.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, channel manager, integrated POS, automation tools, and real-time reporting. These features are designed to support a full-scale, modern hotel operation and are regularly updated.
Chr365 provides no verified features or differentiators, which raises questions about its capabilities. Without a clear feature set or user validation, it’s impossible to compare it meaningfully to Mews.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support system has a reputation for responsiveness, with a 4.27/5 support rating from users who appreciate their quick resolution times and active customer success teams. Many reviewers mention that Mews support helps them implement new features effectively and troubleshoot efficiently.
Chr365, with no reviews or support ratings available, cannot be confidently evaluated. The lack of feedback suggests limited support options, which could be a concern for hotels needing reliable assistance.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, covering channel management, payment providers, revenue tools, and more. Its open API and Marketplace enable seamless connectivity, allowing hotels to customize their tech stacks.
Chr365 has no publicly verified integrations or partner list, limiting its utility in multi-system environments. For hotels seeking a flexible, connected platform, Mews’s extensive ecosystem is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews are recent, over 98 in the last six months, with a 4.62/5 rating and 93% likelihood to recommend, across diverse property types including boutique hotels, hostels, and large brands. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, automation, and support, with many noting measurable operational improvements.
Chr365 has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or confidence. The absence of feedback significantly diminishes its credibility compared to Mews’s proven track record.
Edge: Mews.
Chr365’s pricing is unavailable, which is common among less-established systems. Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no implementation fees or optional charges, providing predictable costs.
The lack of transparent pricing for Chr365 hampers your ability to evaluate ROI, whereas Mews’s clear pricing structure supports budget planning and value assessment.
Given the lack of reviews and features, Chr365 is best suited for very small-scale operations with limited future expansion ambitions.
Mews’s versatility and extensive feature set make it suitable across virtually all hotel types aiming for operational excellence and guest satisfaction.
Mews stands out as the more mature, reviewed, and feature-rich solution with a broad ecosystem and proven customer satisfaction. Chr365’s lack of reviews, features, and integrations makes it a risky choice for hotels serious about growth and efficiency.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable platform backed by recent positive reviews, go with Mews. Its extensive features, support, and integrations justify its higher price point and make it the smarter long-term investment.
Choose Chr365 only if your requirements are minimal, your budget is tight, and you’re comfortable with the unknown. For most hoteliers, Mews is the safer, more capable choice to support today’s demands and tomorrow’s growth.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Acantech |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Chr365 et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Chr365 et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Chr365 propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Chr365 : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Acantech a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 99. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits