The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Ciirus se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Ciirus apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Ciirus |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Ciirus |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Ciirus |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Ciirus |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can be transformative for your hotel’s operations and guest experience. Both Ciirus and Mews aim to streamline your workflows and improve efficiency, but they diverge sharply in execution and market presence. While Ciirus is a niche platform with virtually no recent reviews or notable ratings, Mews stands out as a proven, highly-rated solution with extensive features and broad adoption. How do these differences influence your decision?
Ciirus is marketed as a comprehensive vacation rental PMS, but with an overall rating of 0/5 based on no reviews, it offers little recent feedback or validation from actual users. Conversely, Mews has a 4.62/5 rating with over 750 reviews, including 98 in the last six months, making it the more reliable choice based on current user experience. While Ciirus’s lack of recent reviews makes it difficult to assess, Mews's active user base demonstrates ongoing satisfaction and continuous development.
Both products aim to solve property management challenges, but Ciirus’s limited feature set and absence of verified integrations suggest a lack of depth. Mews, on the other hand, offers over 59 unique features and 336 verified integrations, making it far more adaptable for modern hotel operations. Given the significant gap in market presence, customer feedback, and feature depth, is it worth risking your hotel’s future on a platform with no recent validation?
If your hotel primarily operates as a vacation rental or small-scale property seeking a straightforward management experience, Ciirus might seem appealing—though the lack of recent reviews makes this uncertain. For hotels aiming for scalability, automation, and integration, Mews clearly emerges as the superior option, especially for boutique and mid-sized properties, with proven success stories and a comprehensive feature set.
Hotels that need a well-supported, cloud-native system capable of handling reservations, guest communications, and revenue management should go with Mews. If your hotel requires multi-property management, extensive third-party integrations, or a robust marketplace for add-ons, Mews is the recommended platform. Does your property prioritize proven reliability and ongoing support? Then Mews is the sensible choice.
With a 0/5 ease of use rating for Ciirus and a 4.7/5 rating for Mews, the gap in user experience is stark. Mews’s intuitive, modern interface, backed by positive reviews praising its simplicity and ease of onboarding, makes staff adoption smoother. Users report that Mews’s onboarding process, rated at 4.39/5, is clear and well-supported, leading to quicker ramp-up times.
In contrast, Ciirus provides no recent user feedback or ratings on usability, which is a red flag for hotel teams seeking a straightforward implementation. Based on current data, edge: Mews.
Ciirus claims to be a comprehensive PMS but offers only 0 unique features, suggesting limited capabilities. Mews, however, boasts 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and automation tools, many of which are absent in Ciirus.
Specific functions like integrated CRS, digital registration, automated reminders, and guest messaging are exclusive to Mews, enabling a more personalized and efficient guest journey. For hotel operators seeking robust automation and customization, edge: Mews.
Ciirus has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge support quality. Mews, with a 4.27/5 customer support rating based on 758 reviews, is widely praised for its responsive, helpful team and proactive onboarding assistance, though some users mention occasional bugs.
Recent reviews highlight Mews’s support as a key factor in their satisfaction, citing quick issue resolution and ongoing training. Given the lack of validation for Ciirus’s support, edge: Mews.
Ciirus has zero verified integrations, severely limiting its flexibility and potential for growth. Mews, with 336 verified partners, integrates with channel managers, payment providers, CRMs, and other essential hotel tech.
Shared integrations are nonexistent, but Mews’s extensive ecosystem supports diverse operational needs, providing a tailored tech stack. For hotels seeking connectivity and automation, edge: Mews.
With no recent reviews for Ciirus, there’s no current data to gauge hotel satisfaction. Mews, rated 4.64/5 among 679 reviews (including 98 recent ones), enjoys high approval from boutique, independent, and city hotel segments.
Mews’s positive feedback emphasizes its ease of use, automation, and support, with some hotelers noting it has transformed their operations. For reliable, up-to-date ratings, edge: Mews.
Ciirus does not publish pricing details, leaving potential buyers in the dark. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no implementation or extra fees noted.
While Mews’s pricing may seem high, its extensive features and integrations justify the cost for most hotels seeking growth and efficiency. Without transparent pricing, the decision favors Mews, which offers clear value.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Core difference: Mews is a well-supported, full-featured PMS with a broad ecosystem, while Ciirus offers a limited, less validated platform with no recent reviews. For most hotels, Mews’s extensive features, integrations, and proven customer satisfaction make it the clear choice.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs automation, connectivity, and scalability—its recent reviews and high ratings confirm its reliability. For boutique hotels, independents, and multi-property operators seeking growth, Mews is the recommended solution.
Opt for Ciirus only if your operation is limited to basic vacation rentals with no plans for expansion or integration, and you’re comfortable with the lack of current validation. Given the market landscape, Mews’s proven track record makes it the more dependable partner for the future.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Ciirus |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Ciirus et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Ciirus |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Ciirus et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Ciirus propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Ciirus : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Ciirus a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 99. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits