The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Citadel se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Citadel apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Citadel |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between Citadel by Citadel and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations, but Citadel’s limited review data and absence from recent feedback make it a less reliable choice. Conversely, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, extensive features, and strong support. Are you prepared to trust a platform backed by vibrant user confidence?
While Citadel claims to safeguard digital assets with AI-driven cybersecurity, it’s not a property management system in the traditional sense. Mews, with its cloud-based PMS, is built explicitly for hoteliers seeking operational and guest experience improvements. Which product aligns more with your core priorities?
Citadel’s core offering appears to focus on cybersecurity rather than hotel operations, with no recent reviews or user feedback to support its effectiveness for property management. Mews, however, is a mature, widely adopted PMS with over 750 reviews, 98 in the last six months, and a 9.12/5 NPS score, indicating high user satisfaction.
Mews’s recent reviews highlight its intuitive interface, automation, and extensive integrations, making it well-suited for modern hotels. Citadel’s lack of recent validation and absence of user feedback suggest it’s not a serious contender in the PMS space. Are you willing to risk choosing a platform without current user validation? Clearly, Mews stands out as the more credible and proven option.
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich PMS with a broad partner ecosystem, go with Mews. It is ideal for boutique hotels, city center properties, hostels, and chains that want automation, integrations, and guest-centric tools. Citadel’s cybersecurity focus and lack of hotel-specific features make it unsuitable for daily hotel management.
If your priority is digital security and threat detection—perhaps for data protection—it’s worth exploring Citadel, but only as a complementary solution, not a PMS. For core property management, Mews’s proven track record, feature set, and positive recent reviews make it the clear choice for hotels wanting to improve operations and guest satisfaction.
Mews’s ease of use is highly praised, with a 4.7/5 rating and recent reviews emphasizing its modern, intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training needs. Users describe Mews as “very user-friendly,” with “an intuitive setup” that simplifies complex tasks like reservations and payments.
Citadel, however, scores a 0/5 with no recent reviews or user feedback, making it impossible to assess usability or onboarding quality. Given the positive feedback and high usability ratings for Mews, it’s clear that Mews is the easier platform to adopt and operate daily. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, CRM, online check-in, integrated POS, and real-time reporting. Its extensive marketplace with over 1,000 integrations allows hotels to customize and extend functionality.
Citadel provides no publicly available features or integrations, rendering it unsuitable as a PMS. The sheer volume and quality of features in Mews, combined with its open API, give it a decisive advantage for hotels seeking comprehensive management tools. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings (4.27/5) and recent positive reviews highlight its responsive, knowledgeable support team that resolves issues efficiently. Hotelers praise Mews’s onboarding process and ongoing support, often citing support as a key factor in successful adoption.
Citadel has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. Given Mews’s consistent praise in recent reviews, it clearly provides better support. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including shared integrations with Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, and offers over 1,000 integrations through its marketplace. Citadel has zero verified partners or integrations listed, limiting its flexibility and scalability.
For hotels looking to connect with channel managers, revenue tools, or guest engagement platforms, Mews’s extensive ecosystem is a significant advantage. Citadel’s lack of integrations disqualifies it from serious consideration in a modern hotel tech stack. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 and 93% likelihood to recommend are backed by recent reviews from diverse hotel segments, including boutique, city center, and hostels. Hoteliers consistently praise its user-friendliness, automation, and support.
Citadel has no recent reviews or ratings, so it cannot be compared. Based on current data, Mews is clearly the preferred choice among hotel operators. Edge: Mews.
Citadel’s pricing is not publicly available, but it appears to be a cybersecurity platform rather than a PMS, which likely involves custom quotes. Mews’s standard pricing is $900 per month, with no implementation fees or additional charges, making it transparent and predictable.
Given the lack of pricing transparency for Citadel, and considering Mews’s straightforward model, for hotel management needs, Mews’s value proposition is clearer and more accessible.
Citadel excels as a cybersecurity solution but does not serve as a PMS, making it unsuitable for hotel operations. Mews, with its proven, feature-rich platform and extensive recent positive reviews, is the clear choice for hotels seeking efficiency, guest satisfaction, and scalability.
If your hotel needs a management system that automates, integrates, and improves guest experiences, go with Mews. Citadel may be valuable for data security, but it does not replace the operational capabilities of a modern PMS—make your decision based on your core needs.
In summary, Mews’s recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive features make it the stronger choice for your hotel. Citadel’s lack of recent validation and absence from the hotel management space put it at a disadvantage.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Citadel |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Citadel et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Citadel et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Citadel propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Citadel : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Citadel a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits