The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,419 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Cloudbeds se distingue en matiere de intuitiveness and ease of use — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.5/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
GraceSoft se distingue en customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Native Email Marketing and Native Email Marketing.
Notes comparees basees sur 1,419 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $500/mo | From $300/mo |
| Avis verifies | 1,414 | 5 |
Apres analyse de 1,419 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Cloudbeds apprecient surtout intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management, tandis que ceux de GraceSoft mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
Conversion de devises et opérations financières
▾
|
|
|
−
Fonctionnalités mobiles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #2 675 avis | #36 3 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 235 avis | #31 2 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #1 51 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #4 5 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 546 avis | #35 2 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 245 avis | #32 3 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 145 avis | #29 2 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #2 96 avis | #34 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #2 532 avis | #24 1 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #4 166 avis | #33 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #3 201 avis | #17 2 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #3 13 avis | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS and Easy Innkeeping depends on your hotel’s specific needs, tech infrastructure, and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds offers a fully integrated, scalable platform that connects operations, revenue, and distribution in one system, whereas Easy Innkeeping focuses on streamlining reservations and guest communications with straightforward features. How do you balance comprehensive functionality with ease of use, and which platform aligns better with your operational scale?
Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set and large review base make it the more proven choice, especially for properties seeking growth and automation. Easy Innkeeping’s simpler approach may suit smaller properties prioritizing straightforward reservation management. Are you prepared to invest in a versatile, future-ready system, or do you need a more focused solution for immediate operational efficiency?
Cloudbeds and Easy Innkeeping both aim to simplify hotel management, but they cater to different hotel profiles. Cloudbeds is designed to serve properties looking for a unified platform that handles reservations, channel management, revenue optimization, and guest experience, supporting a wide range of property types and sizes. Easy Innkeeping is more suited for small to midsized properties, inns, or vacation rentals that prioritize reservation handling and direct booking facilitation without extensive additional features.
Where Cloudbeds excels with over 1,200 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 overall score, it’s clearly the industry’s favored solution, especially for properties planning to scale. Easy Innkeeping, with just 5 reviews and a 0/5 score, lacks recent customer feedback—making it difficult to assess reliability or ongoing support. Do you want a platform with proven market presence and ongoing innovation, or one still seeking validation?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable system that integrates PMS, channel management, revenue tools, and guest engagement, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its platform supports properties of all sizes, particularly those aiming for automation, data-driven decision-making, and growth into new markets.
If your hotel primarily requires reservation management, basic guest communication, and simple OTA integration, Easy Innkeeping might suffice. However, given its limited reviews and recent data, Cloudbeds’s broad feature set, extensive integrations, and proven track record make it a more reliable long-term investment. Are you seeking a system that can grow with your hotel, or do you prefer a straightforward, entry-level solution?
Cloudbeds’s user interface scores 4.58/5, praised for its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and ease of staff adoption, supported by a review describing it as “very easy to navigate.” On the other hand, Easy Innkeeping scores 4.4/5, with positive feedback emphasizing its straightforward reservation and guest communication features.
Despite Cloudbeds’s slightly higher rating, both platforms are considered user-friendly. However, Cloudbeds’s extensive training resources and large support team contribute to a smoother onboarding experience for larger teams. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 49 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, revenue management, multi-lingual support, and a sophisticated channel manager. It also offers advanced booking engine capabilities, automated reporting, and integrated payment processing, making it a versatile choice for diverse property types.
Easy Innkeeping offers only 7 features unique to its platform, mainly focused on reservations, guest CRM, and basic OTA connections. While sufficient for small properties, it lacks the breadth of automation and operational tools Cloudbeds provides.
Given the extensive feature set and recent industry awards, Cloudbeds has the edge for hotels seeking a comprehensive management system.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds supports its users with a 4.38/5 customer support rating, praised for quick responses and helpful service, with reviews mentioning “responsive and friendly” support staff. However, some users note occasional delays during peak times.
Easy Innkeeping scores a perfect 5/5, with reviewers highlighting “excellent support” and “generous, courteous staff” that promptly resolve issues. Yet, its small sample size of reviews and lack of recent feedback make it harder to gauge ongoing support quality.
Given Cloudbeds’s larger, more recent review base and consistent support ratings, it has the advantage. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s 4.62/5 rating is backed by over 1,200 reviews, with recent feedback confirming its ease of use, integration, and scalability. Properties across segments—particularly boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts—appreciate its reliability and growth features.
Easy Innkeeping’s 0/5 rating, based on only 5 reviews with no recent data, diminishes confidence in its current performance and support. Hoteliers seeking proven solutions with measurable satisfaction should favor Cloudbeds.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s pricing begins at $500/month, with no free tier or trial info available, reflecting its enterprise-grade capabilities. Its cost is justified by the extensive features, integrations, and support that come with the platform.
Easy Innkeeping’s base price is $300/month, with a 30-day trial, making it more accessible for smaller properties with limited budgets. However, the limited feature set might not justify the price for properties seeking growth or automation.
For most hotels aiming for scalability and comprehensive management, Cloudbeds’s investment offers more value.
Cloudbeds’s broad feature set and global support make it ideal for properties with ambitions to expand or optimize their existing operations.
Easy Innkeeping is suitable for properties with basic operational needs and limited growth plans.
Cloudbeds is the more comprehensive, reliable choice for hoteliers seeking to streamline, automate, and scale their operations. Its extensive feature set, large review base, and recent positive feedback affirm its leadership in the market.
If your hotel prioritizes a robust, integrated system capable of supporting growth and complex operations, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. It provides advanced tools for revenue, distribution, and guest management—making it the smarter long-term investment.
Conversely, if your property is small, with simple reservation needs and a tight budget, Easy Innkeeping might suffice, though its limited recent feedback and feature set could pose challenges as your property expands.
Ultimately, for properties serious about growth, efficiency, and guest experience, Cloudbeds offers the deeper, more proven solution.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $300/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Cloudbeds HMS et Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) partagent 41 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Chèques cadeaux | ||
| Connectivité PMS | ||
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Gestion de l'inventaire | ||
| Intégrations bidirectionnelles en temps réel | ||
| Marketing par courriel natif | ||
| Marketing par e-mail natif | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Planification des quarts de travail | ||
| Point de vente | ||
| Tableau de bord analytique |
Affichage des principales differences. 44 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont si... Des inquiétudes subsistent quant à la précision des conversions de devises, notamment dans le cadre d'opérations multidevises. Les utilisateurs ont signalé des écarts qui impactent les processus de rapprochement. Des configurations améliorées pour la conversion des devises pourraient simplifier la gestion financière.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Cloudbeds HMS et Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Cloudbeds HMS propose 189 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Cloudbeds HMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 4.4/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Cloudbeds HMS : Non. Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Cloudbeds a un HT Score de 100 et GraceSoft a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits