The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a critical step in streamlining hotel operations and improving guest experiences. You’re evaluating CMS Hospitality’s GuestCentrix and HotelTime PMS, both designed to automate and organize hotel workflows, but they diverge significantly in features, customer feedback, and regional presence. While GuestCentrix offers a legacy solution with enterprise-level capabilities, HotelTime is a modern, cloud-based platform with a rapidly growing user base and recent positive reviews.
Can your hotel afford to overlook the latest user feedback? Are you prepared to invest in a system that’s proven in diverse markets and with a broad feature set?
GuestCentrix by CMS Hospitality has been on the market for over 30 years, emphasizing stable, enterprise-grade solutions for multi-property operators, ski resorts, and national chains. It boasts a broad suite of features, including trust accounting, central reservations, and conference management, aimed at larger hotels or groups seeking comprehensive control.
In contrast, HotelTime offers a cloud-based, all-in-one platform with over 650 properties in more than 20 countries, focusing on ease of use and rapid deployment. Its extensive feature list includes POS, guest CRM, revenue management, and integrated channel management, making it suitable for a variety of property types, from resorts to boutique hotels.
GuestCentrix’s review count is zero, and its rating is unavailable, indicating limited recent feedback or active users. HotelTime, with 433 reviews and a 4.83/5 rating—including a 93% likelihood to recommend—demonstrates clear customer satisfaction. Given the latest reviews, HotelTime’s user confidence is stronger and more current.
Are you comfortable choosing a system with no recent reviews? Or do recent, verified user experiences influence your decision more?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based platform that offers extensive automation, real-time reporting, and strong user support, HotelTime is the clear choice. It’s ideal for properties that prioritize ease of use, rapid onboarding, and modular features—especially with positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and responsive support.
However, if your hotel operates multiple properties, requires advanced enterprise features like trust accounting, conference management, or complex integrations, GuestCentrix’s longer industry presence and proprietary nature might appeal. But be aware—its lack of recent reviews suggests limited current support or user engagement.
Given the review data, HotelTime’s recent positive feedback and extensive feature set make it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today. GuestCentrix’s reputation appears outdated or under-supported in the current market.
HotelTime’s interface scores a 4.66/5 for ease of use, supported by reviews praising its intuitive design and straightforward navigation. Users appreciate the smooth onboarding process, with an average rating of 4.63/5, and highlight how staff adapt quickly to its features.
GuestCentrix’s rating is 0/5, with no recent reviews or feedback, making it impossible to assess its current user-friendliness. Historically, enterprise systems like GuestCentrix tend to have steeper learning curves and longer onboarding times, which could hinder staff adoption today.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers 51 unique features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, online booking engine, automated night audit, mobile app, and comprehensive revenue management tools. Its extensive integration options support third-party systems like Sage, Profitroom, and STR, giving you flexibility.
GuestCentrix provides no specific feature count but offers core PMS functions like reservations and trust accounting, targeted at larger operations. Its lack of recent feature innovation, combined with no recent customer reviews, suggests it may not keep pace with evolving hotel technology needs.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support ratings are high, with an average of 4.73/5, and reviews mentioning quick, responsive assistance. Customers say support “went above and beyond,” especially during onboarding and system troubleshooting, contributing to a 9.26/5 NPS score.
GuestCentrix’s support rating is unreported, and with no recent reviews, there’s little current data on support quality. Historically, CMS Hospitality emphasizes support but may not match HotelTime’s recent customer feedback levels.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified integrations, including popular partners like STAAH, SiteMinder, and Cendyn, with seven shared integrations with GuestCentrix. Its open API architecture allows seamless connection to revenue management, POS, and CRM systems.
GuestCentrix has just 12 verified partners, with integrations limited mainly to traditional enterprise systems like Sage and Infor. Its smaller partner network could restrict flexibility for hotels seeking comprehensive third-party connectivity.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews indicate a 4.83/5 rating, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, support responsiveness, and operational improvements. Properties across various segments, especially resorts and city hotels, report high satisfaction levels.
GuestCentrix has no recent reviews, leaving potential users without recent data on hotel satisfaction. Its historical reputation was stable, but current performance remains unverified.
Edge: HotelTime.
GuestCentrix does not publicly list pricing; it typically offers bespoke quotes based on property size and needs. This makes direct comparison difficult, but it suggests a premium enterprise-level pricing model.
HotelTime charges $600 per month, with no free tier or trial, indicating an accessible price point for many hotels seeking a feature-rich PMS without large upfront investments.
In terms of transparency and value, HotelTime’s straightforward pricing allows easier budgeting and decision-making.
Edge: HotelTime.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The essential difference is that HotelTime is a modern, cloud-based PMS with a rapidly growing user base and high recent ratings, while GuestCentrix offers an older, enterprise-focused platform with no recent reviews.
If your hotel values ease of use, recent positive feedback, and extensive integrations, HotelTime should be your top choice. It’s especially suited for properties seeking a scalable solution with proven customer satisfaction.
GuestCentrix might be suitable for very large, multi-property operations with complex enterprise requirements, but its lack of current reviews and recent activity suggests it may not keep pace with evolving hotel tech landscapes.
For most hotels today, HotelTime offers a more reliable, user-friendly, and well-supported option.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) propose 12 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. CMS Hospitality (GuestCentrix) a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits