The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Comanche International se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Comanche International apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) is a critical decision for your hotel, impacting daily operations, guest experience, and revenue. Comanche PMS by Comanche International and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a more established platform with extensive integrations or a feature-rich, cloud-based solution with a broader user base.
Both systems aim to automate reservations, housekeeping, billing, and guest management, but their approach and maturity differ. Are you looking for a system with proven industry presence and more recent positive reviews, or one with a more limited current footprint?
Comanche PMS has been in the market since 2003 and is based in Thailand, serving over 900 customers across 18 countries. Its overall rating is 0/5 with no recent reviews, reflecting a lack of current user feedback, which makes assessing its effectiveness difficult. HOTELTIME, however, boasts a high rating of 4.83 out of 5 based on 433 reviews, with 27 in the last six months alone, indicating active customer engagement and recent performance.
While Comanche emphasizes its total solution approach for hotels and resorts, its lack of recent reviews suggests limited current support or development updates. Conversely, HOTELTIME’s recent reviews praise its ease of use, flexibility, and ongoing improvements, making it a more reliable choice today. Does a system with recent positive feedback matter more for your hotel’s operational stability?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-based PMS that integrates easily with a variety of third-party systems and offers extensive features, HOTELTIME is the clear choice. Its robust ecosystem includes over 50 features like EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, payment processing, and automation tools, making it suitable for properties of all sizes, especially larger or multi-property operations.
In contrast, Comanche PMS might suit smaller or regional hotels seeking a straightforward management system with a focus on core operations, but its limited current reviews and feature set make it less appealing for hotels aiming for modern functionality and seamless integration. If scalability and ongoing support are priorities, HOTELTIME is the safer bet.
HotelTime’s user interface scores 4.66 out of 5, with many reviews praising its intuitive design and quick onboarding process. Customers mention that new staff can adapt rapidly, and the platform’s mobile app further enhances usability. Support and onboarding ratings at 4.73 reflect a team responsive to customer needs, aiding smooth adoption.
Comanche PMS, on the other hand, scores 0/5 in ease of use, with no recent reviews to gauge current UX or onboarding effectiveness. Its lack of recent feedback suggests potential usability issues or limited support resources. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers a comprehensive suite of 51 features, including integrated POS, guest CRM, channel management, automated night audit, digital registration, and more, tailored for full-scale hotel operations. These features are designed to improve operational efficiency and guest experience, with many accessible on mobile devices.
Comanche PMS provides no distinct features or added modules, focusing primarily on core hotel management functions. Its limited feature set and absence of recent updates make it less capable of supporting complex or multi-department hotel needs. Edge: HotelTime.
HOTELTIME enjoys an average support rating of 4.73, with recent reviews describing their support team as responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful. Customers appreciate quick responses, detailed onboarding, and continuous assistance, which facilitate smooth system use and upgrades.
Comanche PMS has no recent reviews or support ratings available, indicating a lack of current customer feedback or visible support activity. This absence raises concerns about ongoing support quality. Edge: HotelTime.
HOTELTIME integrates with 58 verified partners, including major channel managers and third-party solutions like Profitroom, RevControl, and STR, providing extensive flexibility. Its numerous integrations support a broad range of hotel operations and revenue management tools.
Comanche PMS connects with 12 verified partners, including global players like SiteMinder and D-Edge but has fewer options overall. Its limited integration ecosystem may restrict hotel modernization or expansion plans. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s reviews are significantly more recent and positive, with a 93% likelihood to recommend and an average rating of 4.83/5 based on 433 reviews, especially praised by hotels of various sizes and segments. Larger properties and resorts report notable operational improvements.
Comanche PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to determine current user satisfaction. Its absence of recent feedback favors HotelTime’s proven performance and customer approval. Edge: HotelTime.
Comanche PMS does not publicly list pricing, which suggests a customized quote based on specific hotel needs. HotelTime charges $600 per month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting a predictable subscription model for mid-sized to large hotels.
The lack of transparent pricing for Comanche PMS complicates budget planning, whereas HotelTime’s fixed monthly fee offers clarity. If budget predictability is essential, HotelTime’s pricing simplifies decision-making.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their market presence and feature sets. HotelTime’s recent reviews, extensive integrations, and broad feature portfolio make it a more suitable choice for modern, multi-department hotels looking for scalable solutions.
Choose Comanche PMS if your hotel operates in specific regions with limited need for advanced automation or integrations and if you are comfortable with less current user feedback. Its limited feature set and support may constrain growth and efficiency.
HotelTime excels in supporting diverse property types with a comprehensive, cloud-based platform backed by active user feedback and ongoing updates. Its extensive network of integrations and support services make it a safer, more future-proof investment.
If operational stability and modern features matter most, go with HotelTime. For regional, small-scale management with minimal complexity, Comanche might suffice, but with acknowledged limitations.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Comanche PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Comanche PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Comanche PMS propose 12 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Comanche PMS : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Comanche International a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 91. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits