The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Desbravador se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Desbravador apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Desbravador |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Desbravador |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Desbravador |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Desbravador |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Currently, Desbravador by Desbravador has no reviews or ratings and appears to lack recent customer feedback, making it difficult to gauge its current effectiveness. In contrast, HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME boasts over 430 reviews, with 27 recent ones in the last six months, indicating active customer engagement and ongoing development. Given this, HotelTime presents a more reliable choice based on current user experiences.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, user-friendly PMS with extensive integrations and strong customer support, HotelTime is the clear front-runner. Desbravador’s lack of recent reviews and limited data suggest it might not meet modern hospitality demands as effectively. Are you ready to prioritize proven performance, or are you willing to risk unverified solutions?
Desbravador promises a broad scope of hotel management features, aiming to streamline operations through real-time booking, customer management, and reporting. However, its zero reviews and absence of recent feedback cast doubt on its current functionality or implementation success. HotelTime, on the other hand, is a mature platform with over 430 reviews, a high overall rating of 4.83 out of 5, and recent positive feedback emphasizing its operational efficiency and ease of use.
The critical divergence lies in market presence and proven reliability. HotelTime’s extensive adoption in over 650 properties across 20+ countries underscores its stability and adaptability. Desbravador’s lack of regional presence and customer testimonials suggest it may not deliver the consistent value you require. Do you prefer a system with verified performance or one with untested claims?
If your hotel needs a well-established, full-featured PMS capable of handling everything from reservations to revenue management, HotelTime is the logical pick. Its 51 exclusive features include integrated CRS, guest CRM, online booking, and automation tools—features that have been praised for enhancing operational efficiency. Conversely, Desbravador’s limited or non-existent feature disclosures and zero reviews suggest it might struggle to meet the diverse demands of modern hotels.
For hotels seeking reliability, ease of integration, and ongoing support, HotelTime’s proven track record and broad feature set make it the superior choice. If you are open to a newer, less proven product, Desbravador might be worth exploring, but be prepared for uncertainty. Which qualities are more critical for your operation—guaranteed performance or potential innovation?
HotelTime scores highly for usability, with a 4.66 out of 5 rating in user experience, and its reviews frequently mention an intuitive interface that simplifies staff onboarding. Customers also commend its clear management reporting and relatively gentle learning curve, despite some initial complexity with feature setup. Desbravador, lacking any reviews, provides no data on usability, leaving its ease of adoption uncertain.
Given the active feedback and high usability rating, Edge: HotelTime. The absence of user reviews for Desbravador means you lack insight into real-world staff adoption and day-to-day usability, which are essential for smooth hotel operations.
HotelTime offers 51 distinct features exclusive to its platform—ranging from integrated CRS, guest CRM, online booking, and advanced revenue management to automation tools like electronic check-in and real-time reporting. It also includes modules for POS, group management, and digital registration, which are highly valued by users.
Desbravador does not disclose any specific features or modules, and with no reviews to verify its capabilities, it’s impossible to compare feature depth confidently. Based on available data, Edge: HotelTime. Its extensive suite of functionalities is well-documented and actively supported.
HotelTime’s customer support scores a 4.73 out of 5, with reviewers highlighting quick responses, ongoing assistance, and dedicated onboarding. Testimonials describe the support team as helpful, knowledgeable, and instrumental in minimizing system setup challenges. Desbravador, with no reviews, offers no insights into customer service quality or support responsiveness.
Given the critical role support plays in system adoption and ongoing operations, Edge: HotelTime. Its demonstrated support excellence is a decisive advantage for hoteliers who rely on timely assistance.
HotelTime features 58 verified integrations, including popular partners like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, facilitating a connected tech stack for your hotel. These integrations span channel management, POS, revenue management, and more, allowing a streamlined operational flow. Desbravador, however, has zero verified partners, which may limit its ability to connect with other systems or adapt to your existing infrastructure.
Edge: HotelTime. Its wide array of integrations ensures your hotel can operate efficiently within a modern, connected environment.
With 430+ reviews and recent feedback, HotelTime’s average rating of 4.83 out of 5 reflects strong customer satisfaction across multiple hotel segments, including city center hotels, resorts, and boutique properties. Reviewers consistently praise its ease of use, automation, and support, making it a trusted tool for daily operations.
Desbravador’s lack of reviews means no reliable data exists on user satisfaction. Until proven otherwise, HotelTime’s high rating clearly indicates a more trusted, well-received solution. Edge: HotelTime.
Desbravador does not disclose pricing information, leaving potential buyers unsure of its cost structure. HotelTime charges a fixed $600 monthly fee, with no implementation or setup costs, making its pricing transparent and predictable.
Without clear pricing for Desbravador, HotelTime’s straightforward fee model offers better budget clarity. Edge: HotelTime.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Edge: Desbravador may suit niche or small-scale operations willing to accept higher uncertainty.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Edge: HotelTime suits a wide range of hotel types, especially those requiring a proven, comprehensive PMS.
Desbravador remains an untested option lacking recent reviews, making it a risky choice for hotels that need proven solutions. HotelTime, with its extensive customer base, high ratings, and active recent feedback, stands out as a reliable partner for streamlining operations and boosting guest satisfaction.
If your hotel values proven reliability, extensive features, and strong support, HotelTime is the recommended option. It’s well-suited for properties looking to modernize, integrate, and grow without unnecessary risk. Conversely, if you are experimenting with smaller or niche operations and willing to accept uncertainty, Desbravador might be worth exploring, but with caution.
In summary, HotelTime provides a clear edge with verified performance, proven customer satisfaction, and extensive capabilities—making it the safer, smarter investment for your hotel’s future.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Desbravador |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Desbravador et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Desbravador |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Desbravador et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Desbravador propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Desbravador : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Desbravador a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits