The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 34 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
DJUBO se distingue en onboarding , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Revinate se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Centralized user & role management and Lead Scoring.
Notes comparees basees sur 34 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 20 | 14 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de réservation hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #7 5 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #16 0 avis | #9 10 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #8 2 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #12 0 avis | #7 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 3 avis | #11 5 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #11 2 avis | #9 8 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | #13 0 avis | #18 0 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | #10 0 avis | #11 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #13 0 avis | #6 12 avis |
| Europe | — | #15 0 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #2 5 avis | #13 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | #11 0 avis | — |
Choosing the right hotel reservations software can significantly impact your property’s revenue, guest experience, and operational efficiency. Both DJUBO and Revinate aim to streamline reservation management, but they differ fundamentally in scope and focus. DJUBO offers an all-in-one platform integrating property management, channel distribution, and revenue tools, while Revinate specializes in guest data, lead management, and increasing inbound reservation conversions. Which solution aligns more with your hotel’s unique needs?
DJUBO is a comprehensive hospitality management suite that combines multiple essential tools into one platform, reducing the need for third-party integrations. Its extensive feature set includes channel management, PMS, booking engine, POS, and revenue management, making it suitable for properties seeking operational control and integration.
Revinate, on the other hand, is primarily focused on guest data, CRM, and reservation sales optimization. Its strength lies in converting inbound calls and web leads into bookings, especially boosting voice channel revenue and guest engagement. Do you prioritize a unified management system or a specialized focus on reservation sales and guest data?
If your hotel needs a full scope of operational tools—such as property management, channel distribution, and back-office functions—DJUBO is the clear choice. Its suite of 28 unique features and integrations suits multi-property hotels or independent properties aiming for centralized control.
Conversely, if your main concern is maximizing inbound reservations, capturing guest leads, and improving call center efficiency, Revinate is more appropriate. Its core strengths are lead management, CRM, and targeted sales support, with a focus on driving reservations through voice and online channels. Is your priority operations or guest conversion?
DJUBO boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.65/5, with positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and modular design. Users note that onboarding is smooth and staff adopt the platform quickly, with some room for UI improvements.
Revinate scores slightly higher at 4.73/5, with reviewers emphasizing its user-friendly call center interface and effective lead management tools. Customers appreciate the platform's straightforward setup and the ability to quickly train agents.
Edge: Revinate.
DJUBO’s 28 features include channel management, multi-currency handling, PMS, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and more—covering nearly every aspect of hotel operations. Its integrated modules support complex workflows and multi-property management, offering a broad operational toolkit.
Revinate provides 3 unique features: lead scoring, contact management, and centralized user & role management. While more streamlined, these features focus on guest engagement and sales optimization rather than operational complexity.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO’s support scores at 4.63/5, with reviews mentioning responsive, helpful post-sale assistance and ongoing support. Users appreciate their technical upgrades and onboarding, though some note reporting could improve.
Revinate edges slightly with a 4.64/5 rating, praised for quick, customized support and proactive account management. Customers highlight strong ongoing engagement and strategic assistance, especially for sales teams.
Edge: Revinate.
Revinate vastly outstrips DJUBO with 98 verified integrations, including major platforms like Tripadvisor, Incite Response, and Orange Hotel Marketing. This extensive network supports diverse marketing, CRM, and distribution needs.
DJUBO offers 3 verified partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, focusing more on core hospitality integrations. While more limited, DJUBO’s integrations cover essential operational tools.
Edge: Revinate.
DJUBO’s 20 reviews, primarily from Indian properties, average around 5/5, with notable praise for its cost-effectiveness and modular approach. Recent reviews highlight its multi-property management and rate planning.
Revinate, with 11 reviews mostly from North American luxury hotels, also averages 5/5. Users particularly value its lead management and CRM capabilities, with recent comments emphasizing its role in revenue growth.
While both are highly rated, Revinate’s more recent reviews give it a slight edge for perceived ongoing value.
Edge: Revinate.
Both platforms do not publicly display detailed pricing. DJUBO’s model appears to be a custom quote based on modules and hotel size, with no implementation or trial info. Revinate similarly offers tailored pricing, with no free tier or trial indicated.
Expect to negotiate pricing based on your hotel’s needs, especially for DJUBO’s modules or Revinate’s CRM add-ons.
DJUBO provides a full-featured, integrated management platform ideal for properties needing operational control and multi-property oversight. Its broad feature set supports complex workflows, with recent reviews confirming ease of use and high satisfaction.
Revinate specializes in reservation sales and guest data management, excelling at converting inbound inquiries into confirmed bookings. Its extensive integrations and superior recent ratings make it a strong choice for hotels prioritizing inbound reservations and CRM-driven growth.
If your hotel needs a broad operational toolkit and multi-property management, choose DJUBO. For boosting inbound reservations, improving guest engagement, and leveraging guest data, Revinate is the better fit.
In summary, both solutions are highly rated, but Revinate’s more recent positive reviews and extensive integrations give it a slight advantage for hotels focused on reservations and guest relationships. That said, if operational management is your priority, DJUBO remains a solid contender, especially given its feature breadth and multi-property support.
Note: Given your hotel’s specific goals—whether operational control or reservation sales optimization—your choice should align with the core needs outlined. Both platforms have proven success, but recent reviews favor Revinate’s focus on inbound reservations and guest engagement.
La tarification des Logiciel de réservation hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|---|
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Djubo (CRS) et Revinate (Reservation Sales Suite) partagent 2 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Gestion des canaux et distribution OTA | ||
| Gestion des contacts | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Notation des prospects | ||
| Système de gestion immobilière |
Affichage des principales differences. 19 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Djubo (CRS) et Revinate (Reservation Sales Suite) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Reservations Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Djubo (CRS) propose 3 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Revinate (Reservation Sales Suite) en propose 98. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Djubo (CRS) est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 4.6/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Djubo (CRS) : Non. Revinate (Reservation Sales Suite) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Reservations Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. DJUBO a un HT Score de 0 et Revinate a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits