The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 171 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
DJUBO se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Requests and Online Check-in.
Visual Matrix PMS se distingue en matiere de technical support challenges , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Messaging and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
Notes comparees basees sur 171 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avis verifies | 19 | 152 |
Apres analyse de 171 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de DJUBO apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Visual Matrix PMS mettent en avant technical support challenges, interface conviviale, comprehensive reporting tools. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface conviviale
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
|
−
Vitesse du système et disponibilité des fonctionnalités
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de gestion hôtelière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #31 3 avis | #18 23 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #43 0 avis | #2 117 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #11 5 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #25 0 avis | #16 1 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 2 avis | #12 38 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #31 2 avis | #16 17 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #39 0 avis | #1 124 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #31 0 avis | #4 44 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #33 0 avis | #7 141 avis |
| Europe | — | #32 1 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | #10 3 avis | #18 2 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | #16 0 avis | — |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly impact your operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both DJUBO and Visual Matrix PMS aim to streamline your hotel’s daily tasks, but their approaches and strengths differ. DJUBO offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform that consolidates multiple functions, while Visual Matrix PMS specializes in operational efficiency with robust features and integrations. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
DJUBO is a cloud-based, all-in-one platform designed to unify your PMS, channel manager, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office functions. It’s built for hotels seeking a centralized system that reduces reliance on multiple disconnected tools, delivering real-time control across operations. Visual Matrix PMS, on the other hand, focuses on optimizing core hotel tasks with an emphasis on automation, staff coordination, and seamless integrations, especially suitable for understaffed properties or those needing quick operational boosts.
The key divergence lies in their scope: DJUBO consolidates many functionalities into one system, while Visual Matrix PMS emphasizes operational speed and ease of use with extensive integrations. DJUBO, with a perfect overall rating of 5/5 and more recent active reviews, clearly demonstrates strong adoption and confidence among hoteliers. Visual Matrix PMS boasts a broader user base, particularly in branded hotels, with a 3.75/5 overall score based on more reviews and a more established presence.
Are you looking for an all-in-one solution that reduces complexity, or a specialized PMS that integrates well with existing tools? Your choice depends on your hotel’s scale, staff capacity, and operational priorities.
If your hotel needs a single platform to handle reservations, channel management, POS, revenue, and accounting, DJUBO is the better fit. Its broad feature set, including unique offerings like online check-in and payment requests, makes it appealing for independent hotels and multi-property groups seeking streamlined management.
Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency, staff automation, and extensive integrations with third-party systems, Visual Matrix PMS is ideal. Its focus on automation tools like housekeeping, shift planning, and guest messaging—paired with a large partner network—serves understaffed or tech-savvy properties well. For branded hotels looking for a flexible, well-supported platform, Visual Matrix often meets those needs better.
In summary, choose DJUBO when you need a comprehensive, all-in-one management suite. Opt for Visual Matrix PMS if your focus is operational automation, staff coordination, and extensive third-party integrations.
DJUBO scores a remarkable 4.95/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users highlight how quickly staff can adapt to DJUBO, citing the platform's simplicity despite its wide scope, and appreciate its user-friendly design across multiple modules. Training sessions are rated highly, reducing the learning curve for new team members.
Visual Matrix PMS also earns a strong 4.43/5 in usability, with many users citing its familiar interface and ease of navigation. However, some mention that system speed issues and feature bloat can hamper workflows, especially during peak times. Support and onboarding are generally rated well, but the speed limitations are a common concern among users.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers 42 features, including unique capabilities like online check-in and payment requests, not available in Visual Matrix PMS. These features support guest self-service and streamlined payments, which are increasingly important in modern hospitality.
Visual Matrix PMS boasts 40 shared features, with 15 additional exclusive functionalities like guest messaging, integrated payment terminals, drag-and-drop tape charts, and guest CRM. Its automation tools, such as shift planning and GDPR compliance, enhance operational control and staff management.
While both systems are rich in features, DJUBO’s unique offerings around payments and check-in give it a slight edge for properties focused on guest experience. Visual Matrix PMS’s automation and extensive integrations make it a strong choice for operational efficiency.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO is rated 4.76/5 for customer support, with reviews emphasizing its supportive staff and ongoing upgrades. One reviewer highlighted, “The support team is always available and very professional,” reflecting its strong reputation for responsiveness.
Visual Matrix PMS has a support rating of 4.34/5, with users appreciating knowledgeable tech support and helpful weekly tips. Some reviewers mention occasional difficulties in reaching support quickly during critical moments, but overall, support is considered reliable.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO features 3 verified integration partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but its ecosystem is relatively limited. This might restrict your ability to connect with specialized third-party tools if your hotel requires extensive custom integrations.
Visual Matrix PMS offers 23 verified partners, including Hotel Investor Apps, SiteMinder, SkyTouch, and LaaSie.ai. Its broader ecosystem allows more flexible connections with booking engines, POS systems, and revenue tools, making it suitable for hotels with complex tech stacks.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
DJUBO has a higher review count (19 reviews), with an outstanding overall rating of 5/5 and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, comprehensive features, and excellent support, especially in the last six months.
Visual Matrix PMS, with 143 reviews and a 3.75/5 rating, has a more extensive history of user feedback. Its recent reviews highlight its operational strengths but also point to speed issues and some missing functionalities. Its higher review volume suggests a mature product with steady user experience.
Considering recency and scores, DJUBO’s reviews lend it a significant edge for current hotelier confidence.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO does not publicly list specific pricing, indicating a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. It operates on a subscription model without a free tier or trial, making its cost structure less transparent upfront.
Visual Matrix PMS charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no free trial or tier, and no mention of additional costs. Pricing appears straightforward but may be prohibitive for smaller properties or those seeking flexible plans.
In absence of clear, comparable data, your best bet is to request quotes directly from vendors to assess value based on your hotel’s requirements.
Not ideal if you require extensive third-party integrations or highly specialized billing features. Smaller boutique hotels might find DJUBO’s comprehensive approach too broad or costly.
Not ideal if speed and system responsiveness are critical during peak times or if your property relies heavily on advanced billing functionalities absent in the platform.
DJUBO stands out as a highly rated, all-in-one platform with a perfect review score and recent positive feedback. It suits independent hotels and multi-property groups that want unified control over their operations without juggling multiple tools.
Visual Matrix PMS excels in operational automation, extensive integrations, and support for understaffed hotels. Its broad feature set and established presence make it ideal for branded hotels and properties seeking a flexible, automation-driven system.
If simplicity, ease of use, and comprehensive functionality are your priorities, DJUBO is the clear choice. If your focus is on operational efficiency, automation, and extensive third-party connections, Visual Matrix PMS will serve you better.
For most hotels actively evaluating these options today, DJUBO’s more recent reviews and higher satisfaction ratings position it as the more reliable and scalable solution.
La tarification des Logiciel de gestion hôtelière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Djubo et Visual Matrix PMS partagent 40 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Demandes de paiement | ||
| Enregistrement en ligne | ||
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Messagerie aux employés | ||
| Messagerie centralisée | ||
| Messagerie invité | ||
| Ruban graphique par glisser-déposer | ||
| Terminal de paiement et lecteur de carte intégrés |
Affichage des principales differences. 5 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
La conception intuitive de Visual Matrix réduit la courbe d'apprentissage, le rendant accessible aux nouveaux employés. Cependant, certains utilisateu... La conception intuitive de Visual Matrix réduit la courbe d'apprentissage, le rendant accessible aux nouveaux employés. Cependant, certains utilisateurs mentionnent des difficultés initiales lors de la transition depuis d'autres systèmes.
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Djubo et Visual Matrix PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Management Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Djubo propose 3 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Visual Matrix PMS en propose 23. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Djubo est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.9/5 contre 4.4/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Djubo : Non. Visual Matrix PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Management Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. DJUBO a un HT Score de 0 et Visual Matrix PMS a 80. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits