The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 1,332 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
DOWHAT se distingue .
SiteMinder se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.3/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Performance Reporting and Mobile optimized/responsive.
Notes comparees basees sur 1,332 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 1,332 |
Apres analyse de 1,332 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de DOWHAT apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de SiteMinder mettent en avant channel manager capabilities, real-time inventory & rate management, défis du service client. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Channel Manager Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Inventory & Rate Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Défis du service client
▾
|
|
|
+
Overbooking Issues
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Booking Engine Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Défis du service client
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS and Other Systems
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Moteur de réservation pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #45 0 avis | #1 470 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #45 0 avis | #1 527 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #39 0 avis | #1 96 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #30 0 avis | #1 50 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #46 0 avis | #1 564 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #42 0 avis | #1 411 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #42 0 avis | #1 230 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #36 0 avis | #1 174 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #42 0 avis | #2 157 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 266 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #32 0 avis | #1 418 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #3 13 avis |
Choosing between Booking Engine by DOWHAT and SiteMinder's Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and strategic priorities. Both aim to streamline reservations and increase direct bookings, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. DOWHAT’s booking engine is a newcomer with no reviews or recent data, while SiteMinder’s platform is well-established, with over 1,200 reviews and recent performance metrics. Given the stark contrast, the decision should lean heavily toward the product with current, robust user feedback.
DOWHAT’s booking engine is very new, with no reviews or recent user feedback to gauge real-world performance, reliability, or support quality. In contrast, SiteMinder’s platform boasts a 4.48/5 overall rating based on over 1,200 reviews, with recent feedback from 72 users in the last six months, reflecting ongoing updates and user satisfaction. SiteMinder’s extensive review base and recent positive feedback make it the more trustworthy choice for today’s hotelier.
Both products aim to optimize online reservations, but SiteMinder offers a comprehensive array of features, integrations, and a global presence that DOWHAT currently cannot match. If your hotel values proven reliability, a mature ecosystem, and extensive support, SiteMinder is the clear leader. Do you want to risk untested technology, or prefer a platform with recent, high-quality feedback confirming its effectiveness?
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich booking engine with proven support, go with SiteMinder. Its large user base and recent reviews underscore its stability, ease of use, and extensive integrations across multiple channels and PMS systems. For hotels looking to expand distribution and improve operational efficiency with a trusted platform, SiteMinder is the safer, more scalable choice.
Conversely, if your team is open to testing new technology and your primary concern is cutting-edge innovation without current user feedback, DOWHAT might be tempting. But given its lack of reviews, support data, or recent updates, it’s a high-risk option. For a decision rooted in confidence and proven performance, SiteMinder is the clear recommendation.
SiteMinder’s interface receives a 4.6/5 ease of use rating, with many users praising its intuitive setup, straightforward navigation, and quick onboarding process. Reviewers highlight its user-friendliness even for staff with limited tech experience, along with clear documentation and support.
DOWHAT’s booking engine, however, has no reviews or ratings available, leaving its usability and onboarding quality completely unverified. While AI descriptions suggest a simple interface, the absence of user feedback makes it impossible to gauge real-world user satisfaction. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s booking engine offers 39 features across various categories, including room & rate filtering, performance reporting, rate intelligence, multi-currency support, PMS connectivity, and automation tools like pre-stay and post-stay emails. These features cater to large and small hotels seeking detailed control and insights.
DOWHAT’s booking engine appears to lack any listed features beyond basic booking functionalities, with no public information on advanced tools or integrations. The feature gap is significant, especially for hotels aiming for sophisticated revenue management or multi-channel distribution. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s customer support scores 4.43/5, with many reviews praising its responsiveness, multilingual support, and helpful onboarding. Notably, clients like Hotel Amicizia and Hotel Graf Bentinck report improved efficiency and fewer manual errors thanks to reliable support.
DOWHAT’s support quality cannot be assessed, as it has no reviews or customer feedback available. The absence of data raises questions about its responsiveness, onboarding, and ongoing assistance. For dependable support, SiteMinder clearly leads. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder provides integrations with over 245 verified partners, including major PMS systems, channel managers, and booking platforms like Oracle Hospitality, Duve, and others. Its open API and extensive partner network enable hotels to connect seamlessly with existing systems and expand distribution.
DOWHAT’s platform has only 2 verified partners, with one shared integration (Oracle Hospitality). The limited connectivity suggests fewer options for expanding or customizing your hotel’s tech ecosystem. For scalability and flexibility, SiteMinder offers the superior integration capability. Edge: SiteMinder.
SiteMinder’s overall rating of 4.48/5 across 1,207 reviews makes it the most highly-rated choice. Recent reviews emphasize its stability, ease of use, and ability to increase direct bookings, especially among boutique, city center, and resort hotels.
DOWHAT has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Without recent, verified feedback, hoteliers should favor SiteMinder’s proven track record. Edge: SiteMinder.
DOWHAT’s pricing details are unavailable, indicating either a lack of transparent pricing or a nascent product. This obscurity complicates value assessment and budget planning.
SiteMinder charges a base fee of $500 monthly, with no additional implementation or per-room fees. This predictable structure allows hotels to budget effectively. Given the lack of transparent pricing for DOWHAT, SiteMinder offers clearer value for investment.
Hotels that are experimental, early adopters, or operating on very tight budgets might consider DOWHAT, especially if they want to test new technology without significant upfront costs. It could be suitable for small, independent hotels or vacation rentals looking for basic booking capabilities.
Not ideal if your hotel requires robust features, reliable support, or integration with multiple channels. Larger, revenue-focused hotels that depend on proven technology should avoid DOWHAT until it demonstrates stability and feature maturity through user feedback.
Hotels seeking a proven, scalable, and feature-rich booking engine should choose SiteMinder. It is ideal for independent boutique hotels, resorts, and city hotels that need extensive distribution control, detailed analytics, and seamless PMS integration.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very tight budget or requires a simple booking system without extensive features. Small properties with minimal distribution needs or those preferring a DIY approach might find SiteMinder’s cost and complexity overwhelming.
The core difference between the two products is maturity and proven performance. SiteMinder’s booking engine has a long track record, extensive features, and highly positive recent reviews, making it the more dependable choice today.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich system with global distribution, robust support, and proven scalability, choose SiteMinder. Its extensive integrations and customer satisfaction ratings make it a particularly strong candidate for most mid-sized and larger hotels.
However, if you are willing to take a risk on an untested platform, and your priorities are experimentation or niche use cases, DOWHAT’s offering might be worth exploring—though it’s important to note the current lack of evidence supporting its performance.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming for stability, growth, and confidence in their online booking operations, SiteMinder’s booking engine stands out as the smarter, more secure investment today.
La tarification des Moteur de réservation est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Booking Engine by DOWHAT et SiteMinder Booking Engine partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| API ouverte | ||
| Comparaison des tarifs des chambres | ||
| Filtrage par type de chambre et de tarif | ||
| Filtres d'achat de taux rapides | ||
| Rapports sur les performances | ||
| Taux de renseignement |
Affichage des principales differences. 27 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"As mentioned by Jacqueline, efficiency is key in the daily runnings of a property. The fast-paced nature of hospitality means that when guests have a problem, it needs to be solved..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"The team understood our needs, and tweaked the interface to optimise performance accordingly."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We are a transformative business in the Southeast Asian market, in that guests can easily book stays of a varied length and be confident in the consistency of their experience. Thi..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory syn... The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory synchronized. It is particularly recognized for its stability in providing real-time updates and minimizing manual interventions.
SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings a... SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings and ensures accuracy in distribution. Users appreciate the seamless and efficient synchronization with various OTAs, even during high demand periods.
Bien que la plateforme soit efficace, certains utilisateurs ont exprimé des inquiétudes quant à la lenteur du service client, un problème particulière... Bien que la plateforme soit efficace, certains utilisateurs ont exprimé des inquiétudes quant à la lenteur du service client, un problème particulièrement préoccupant aux heures de pointe. Un support plus rapide et plus réactif est donc considéré comme un axe d'amélioration.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individua... Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individual hotel branding. Including more flexible design elements could aid in differentiating a hotel's direct booking experience from OTAs.
Bien que la plateforme soit efficace, certains utilisateurs ont exprimé des inquiétudes quant à la lenteur du service client, un problème particulière... Bien que la plateforme soit efficace, certains utilisateurs ont exprimé des inquiétudes quant à la lenteur du service client, un problème particulièrement préoccupant aux heures de pointe. Un support plus rapide et plus réactif est donc considéré comme un axe d'amélioration.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Booking Engine by DOWHAT et SiteMinder Booking Engine partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Booking Engine de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Booking Engine by DOWHAT propose 2 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que SiteMinder Booking Engine en propose 245. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. SiteMinder Booking Engine est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.6/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Booking Engine by DOWHAT : Non. SiteMinder Booking Engine : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Booking Engine proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. DOWHAT a un HT Score de 0 et SiteMinder a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits