The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
easyGuestmanagement se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de easyGuestmanagement apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between easyGuestmanagement GmbH's platform and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in features, scale, and user feedback. easyGuestmanagement offers a niche solution with no recent reviews or ratings, while Mews provides a robust, widely adopted platform with extensive real-world validation.
Given the differences, which system aligns better with your hotel’s current requirements and future plans?
easyGuestmanagement and Mews serve the same fundamental purpose—helping hotels manage reservations, billing, and guest communications. However, easyGuestmanagement's platform has no recent reviews or publicly visible ratings, which limits confidence in its current functionality and support. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews in the last six months alone, with a 4.62/5 rating, indicating high user satisfaction.
The critical difference is that Mews has proven its reliability through extensive user feedback, while easyGuestmanagement’s lack of recent reviews and zero score suggest limited recent adoption or validation. Do you want a system with proven performance and ongoing support?
If your hotel operates multiple properties, seeks extensive integrations, or plans to scale, Mews is the clear choice. Its 336 verified integrations, global presence in 54 countries, and dedicated support make it suitable for a broad range of hotel types, from boutique to large chains. Conversely, easyGuestmanagement’s limited feature set and lack of recent validation make it more suitable for very small, single-property operations that don’t require extensive customization or future growth.
If scalability, integrations, and proven performance matter to you, go with Mews. If you need a simple, local solution for a single property with minimal tech needs, easyGuestmanagement might suffice—but beware of limited support options.
Mews consistently earns high usability ratings—4.7/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface, modern design, and straightforward onboarding. Users report that staff quickly adopt Mews due to its logical workflows and helpful training resources. In contrast, easyGuestmanagement has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user experience today.
Given Mews’ strong user satisfaction scores and recent positive feedback, it’s the more reliable choice for hotels prioritizing staff adoption and minimal training time. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, housekeeping modules, payment processing, and a marketplace with over 1,000 integrations. easyGuestmanagement, on the other hand, claims no exclusive features beyond basic reservation and billing functions, with no verified features listed.
The extensive feature set and third-party connectivity give Mews a significant advantage for hotels that want flexibility, automation, and innovation. Edge: Mews.
Mews supports its users with an average rating of 4.27/5, and many recent reviews highlight its responsive, helpful support team. Clients mention that Mews’ onboarding, training, and ongoing support are well-organized, with quick problem resolution.
easyGuestmanagement has no recent support ratings or reviews, which raises concerns about ongoing assistance or system updates. Without documented support quality, Mews remains the safer, more dependable option. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations with partners like Criton, Sage, Orange Hotel Marketing, and more, offering extensive customization. easyGuestmanagement lists zero verified partners or integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems or adapt to evolving tech stacks.
For hotels that rely on a broad ecosystem of tools—channel managers, revenue systems, or CRM—Mews clearly provides a more flexible, connected environment. Edge: Mews.
Mews’ reviews, primarily in the last six months, reflect high satisfaction across segments including boutique hotels, hostels, and city center properties, with an overall rating of 4.62/5. Many hoteliers praise its ease of use, reliability, and support.
easyGuestmanagement has no recent reviews or ratings, so no current hotel feedback validates its performance. Given the large volume and recency of Mews reviews, it’s the more trusted product among hotel operators today. Edge: Mews.
easyGuestmanagement does not publicly disclose pricing, making direct comparisons impossible. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no trial or freemium options, reflecting its enterprise-grade positioning.
For budgeting purposes, Mews's transparent pricing aligns with its comprehensive feature set, but the lack of free trials or flexible plans may be a hurdle for smaller properties. No clear details are available for easyGuestmanagement’s costs.
Not ideal if your hotel aims to scale, needs multi-property management, or plans to expand technologically.
Not ideal if you operate a very small, low-tech property that only needs basic reservation functions.
Mews and easyGuestmanagement aim to simplify hotel operations but differ vastly in validation, features, and scope. easyGuestmanagement is practically unreviewed and likely limited in capability, making it unsuitable for hotels with ambitions to grow or integrate.
When choosing, consider your hotel’s size, growth plans, and technology needs. If you want a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive support and integrations, go with Mews. For a very small, single-property operation with minimal requirements, easyGuestmanagement might suffice—but proceed with caution.
If scalability and proven performance are priorities, Mews stands out as the clear choice.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| easyGuestmanagement |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, easyGuestmanagement GmbH et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. easyGuestmanagement GmbH et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. easyGuestmanagement GmbH propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
easyGuestmanagement GmbH : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. easyGuestmanagement a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 99. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits