The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 24 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
eghl se distingue .
roommaster se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenization.
Notes comparees basees sur 24 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 24 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de traitement des paiements pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | eghl |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 6 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 7 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #4 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #4 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | eghl |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 avis |
| Luxe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #4 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #4 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment | eghl |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #4 14 avis |
| Europe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #3 0 avis |
When evaluating payment processing software for your hotel, you’re looking for reliability, ease of integration, and support. eGHL by eghl and Roommaster Payments aim to address these needs, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. While eGHL offers a broad payment platform, the limited review data and absence of recent feedback raise questions about its current viability. Conversely, Roommaster Payments, with 20 recent reviews and high customer support ratings, appears more tested and trusted by hoteliers.
Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize proven support and features or a broader, potentially less mature platform. Both products aim to streamline transactions, but only one has clear, recent customer satisfaction backing it. Can eGHL meet your hotel’s needs effectively, or is Roommaster Payments the safer, more reliable option?
eGHL and Roommaster Payments are designed to simplify hotel payments but diverge in maturity and market presence. eGHL offers no reviews, ratings, or recent user feedback, making it difficult to assess its current performance or support quality. It appears to lack verified integrations, regional presence, and proven hotel use cases, which could impact your hotel’s ability to rely on it.
Roommaster Payments, however, benefits from 20 recent reviews, a 4.45/5 customer support rating, and a broad integration network with 56 verified partners. It’s clearly chosen by hotels across multiple continents and segments, providing a more tested, trustworthy solution. The main question: are you comfortable betting on an unreviewed platform, or do you prefer a solution validated by active hoteliers?
If your hotel needs a payment platform with proven support, extensive integrations, and a track record of customer satisfaction, go with Roommaster Payments. It’s especially suitable if your hotel operates in North America, Europe, or other regions covered by its partnerships, and if your team values features like chargeback management, contactless payments, and PCI compliance.
If, on the other hand, your hotel seeks a potentially customizable solution that might offer broader regional coverage or a different feature set, eGHL could be worth exploring—though the lack of reviews and recent data makes this a riskier choice. For most hoteliers, especially those prioritizing support and reliability, Roommaster Payments is the safer recommendation.
Roommaster Payments scores a high 4.4/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews, with users praising its straightforward interface and helpful onboarding process. Reviewers mention that support is prompt and staff find the platform intuitive, which reduces training time and errors.
In contrast, eGHL offers no available review data, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. The absence of feedback suggests it may not have been widely adopted or tested in real-world hotel environments. Without concrete user insights, the edge goes to Roommaster Payments.
Roommaster Payments includes 13 features specific to hotel payments, such as authorization adjustments, refund management, contactless payments, chargeback management, payment tokenization, and PCI compliance. These features directly address the core needs of hotel operations, especially secure and flexible payment handling.
eGHL provides no specific features or unique functionalities documented in the available data, which limits its appeal for comprehensive hotel payment needs. With a clear feature set and proven integration options, Roommaster Payments holds the edge for hotels seeking robust payment capabilities.
Roommaster Payments boasts a 4.45/5 support rating based on recent reviews, with hoteliers praising the team’s helpfulness and responsiveness. Reviewers highlight quick issue resolution and staff expertise as key strengths.
eGHL offers no available support ratings or recent reviews, leaving its support quality unverified. Given the importance of reliable support in payment processing, Roommaster Payments clearly leads in this area by recent, positive feedback.
Roommaster Payments has verified integrations with 56 partners, including major players like Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Otelier. This broad network ensures easier connectivity with your existing hotel systems and third-party services.
eGHL has no verified integrations listed, which could pose challenges for seamless operation within your current technology stack. The advantage naturally favors Roommaster Payments, especially for hotels that rely on multiple connected systems.
Since eGHL has no reviews or ratings, it cannot be evaluated based on user satisfaction. Roommaster Payments, by contrast, has a 4.45/5 customer support rating from 20 recent reviews, with an 89% likelihood of recommendation and an overall 8.4/10 NPS score.
Hotels of various sizes and segments have expressed satisfaction with Roommaster Payments, noting its support quality and ease of use. This consistent positive feedback underscores its reliability and user trust, a critical consideration for your hotel.
eGHL’s pricing details are unavailable, which makes assessing its value impossible. You should inquire directly with eghl about costs, but beware of hidden fees or unclear pricing structures.
Roommaster Payments has a straightforward base fee of $300 per month, with no mention of implementation or setup costs. Its transparent pricing, coupled with positive reviews on value, makes it easy to budget for this solution.
Hotels that might consider eGHL:
Not ideal if:
Hotels suited for Roommaster Payments:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Roommaster Payments is a tested, supported, and feature-rich platform, while eGHL remains unreviewed and lacks recent user feedback. For hotels seeking reliability and customer support, Roommaster Payments offers a safer, more validated choice.
Choose Roommaster Payments if you want a solution with proven customer satisfaction, strong integrations, and comprehensive features. Its recent reviews and high support ratings make it the clear, risk-averse option.
Opt for eGHL only if you have specific regional needs, technical expertise, or are willing to accept the risk of unverified performance. Without concrete recent data, it’s difficult to recommend eGHL over a more established solution like Roommaster Payments.
This detailed comparison should help you make an informed decision aligned with your hotel’s operational needs and support expectations.
La tarification des Logiciel de traitement des paiements est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| eghl |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
Voici les fonctionnalites configurees par chaque fournisseur, organisees par groupe de fonctionnalites — les memes donnees que dans le tableau de bord du fournisseur. Developpez un groupe pour comparer les fonctionnalites cote a cote.
| Fonctionnalite | eghl |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Automatisation du flux de travail
|
|
|
| Gestion des remboursements | ||
| Pré-autorisations | ||
| Fractionnement des paiements | ||
|
▾
méthodes de payement
|
|
|
| Payer par lien | ||
| Fonction de gratuité | ||
| Capture partielle | ||
| Paiements récurrents | ||
| Plans de versement de Klarna | ||
| Accepte Apple Pay | ||
| Commande par correspondance Commande par téléphone (MOTO) Paiements | ||
| Accepte Google Pay | ||
| Plans de versement | ||
| Accepte Paypal | ||
| Accepte AliPay | ||
| Accepte WeChatPay | ||
| Accepte les visas | ||
| Accepte American Express | ||
| Paiements sans contact | ||
| Accepte la découverte | ||
| Accepte Mastercard | ||
| Accepte Diners Club | ||
|
▾
Sécurité et prévention de la fraude
|
|
|
| Gestion des rétrofacturations | ||
| Tokenisation de paiement | ||
| Pré-autorisations | ||
| Paiements sécurisés en 3D | ||
| Conformité PCI | ||
|
▾
$
Multi-devise
|
|
|
| Règlements multidevises | ||
| Conversion de devise dynamique (DCC) | ||
|
▾
Ajustements
|
|
|
| Ajustements d'autorisation | ||
| Gestion des remboursements | ||
|
▾
Matériel
|
|
|
| Elavon (Traitement des cartes de crédit) | ||
| TSYS (traitement des cartes de crédit) | ||
| GlobalPayments (traitement des cartes de crédit) | ||
| Vantiv (traitement des cartes de crédit) | ||
| Premières données (traitement des cartes de crédit) | ||
| Heartland (traitement des cartes de crédit) | ||
| Chase (traitement des cartes de crédit) | ||
| Passerelle multiprocesseur |
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. eGHL et roommaster Payments partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Payments Processing Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. eGHL propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que roommaster Payments en propose 56. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. roommaster Payments est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.2/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
eGHL : Non. roommaster Payments : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Payments Processing Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. eghl a un HT Score de 0 et roommaster a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété