The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
REPAY se distingue .
roommaster se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenization.
Notes comparees basees sur 23 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 23 |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de traitement des paiements pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 6 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 7 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) | — | #4 1 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | — | #4 0 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 avis |
| Luxe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine | — | #4 1 avis |
| Sejour prolonge | — | #4 0 avis |
Par region
| Segment | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #4 14 avis |
| Europe | — | #5 0 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #3 0 avis |
When evaluating payment processing software for your hotel, both ePay by REPAY and roommaster Payments aim to streamline transactions and reduce manual effort. While both address essential payment needs, they diverge sharply in user reviews, feature sets, and regional presence. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize recent, well-supported solutions or a platform with a proven hotel-specific track record.
ePay by REPAY claims to offer a straightforward, secure payment platform, but lacks user reviews and measurable support metrics. In contrast, roommaster Payments has a robust review history, especially recent positive feedback, making it the more reliable choice today. Which of these solutions aligns better with your hotel’s operational needs?
Both ePay and roommaster Payments aim to facilitate quick and secure transactions, but their real-world performance differs. ePay's limited review presence—no reviews in the last six months and an overall rating of 0/5—raises questions about ongoing support and user satisfaction. roommaster Payments, on the other hand, boasts 20 reviews, with 9 in the last six months, and an 8.4/10 NPS score, indicating recent, positive hotel feedback.
Support quality and user experience are critical; ePay's absence of recent reviews and support ratings suggest a less dependable service. Meanwhile, roommaster Payments’s high support ratings (4.45/5) and recent reviews reflect a more active, responsive vendor. Are you comfortable with a platform that lacks recent validation, or do you prefer one with current, positive feedback?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, hotel-specific payment solution with a proven track record, choose roommaster Payments. Its suite of 13 unique features—like chargeback management, PCI compliance, and contactless payments—caters directly to hospitality workflows. ePay, with no listed features, appears more like a generic payment platform lacking hotel-centric functionalities.
For hotels needing reliable support and a platform tested in hospitality environments, roommaster is the clear option. Conversely, if your focus is purely on basic payment processing without hotel-specific features, ePay might suffice—though its lack of recent reviews weakens this position. Given the data, hotel operators prioritizing proven support and hotel-centric features should lean toward roommaster Payments.
Ease of use is a major factor, especially for staff adoption. ePay’s usability is unverified—it has no reviews or ratings—making it impossible to assess. roommaster Payments, by contrast, has a high 4.4/5 rating, with reviews praising its straightforward interface and smooth integration within hotel workflows.
Reviewers highlight that roommaster Payments offers a user-friendly experience, with minimal errors reported recently, and support staff that are helpful and knowledgeable. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments offers 13 unique features tailored to hotel needs, including authorization adjustments, refunds, contactless payments, chargeback management, and PCI compliance. ePay has no listed features or hotel-specific functionalities, suggesting a limited scope.
The comprehensive features of roommasterPayments enable more control over transactions and security, critical for hotel operations. ePay’s lack of features makes it less suitable for complex hotel needs. Edge: roommaster Payments.
Support quality is vital for smooth operations. ePay’s review footprint provides no recent data on support, leaving its responsiveness and effectiveness uncertain. roommaster Payments boasts a 4.45/5 support rating, with reviews citing helpful, knowledgeable staff and prompt assistance.
Recent reviews from hotel clients emphasize that roommaster’s support team reduces downtime and resolves issues quickly. Given the latest review data, roommaster Payments clearly has the support edge. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments integrates with 56 verified partners, including industry-specific systems like Sage, GuestCentric, and Volo, offering extensive compatibility. ePay, with zero verified integrations, limits your options to a generic stand-alone payment platform.
This broad integration landscape allows roommaster Payments to seamlessly fit into existing hotel tech stacks, reducing setup time and operational friction. ePay’s lack of integrations diminishes its attractiveness for hotel use. Edge: roommaster Payments.
As of now, ePay has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. roommaster Payments, with 20 reviews and a recent 8.4/10 NPS score, indicates strong hotelendorsement.
Segment-wise, hotels valuing support, features, and recent positive feedback prefer roommaster Payments. Given the review volume and ratings, it’s clear that hoteliers prefer roommaster Payments. Edge: roommaster Payments.
ePay’s pricing details are not available publicly, suggesting a customized or opaque pricing structure. roommaster Payments charges a straightforward $300 monthly fee, with no additional implementation or setup costs listed.
For budgeting clarity, roommaster Payments provides transparent, predictable costs, which is advantageous for hotel financial planning. ePay’s vague pricing could pose unforeseen expenses. Edge: roommaster Payments.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Given the limited data, ePay may suit small or non-critical operations in regions with lenient compliance requirements but is generally not recommended for hotels seeking reliable, support-rich payment solutions.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
roommaster Payments suits hotels aiming for operational efficiency and security, especially those with larger or more complex payment workflows.
The core difference lies in their support, features, and regional presence. ePay offers a basic, non-hotel-specific platform with no recent reviews, making it a risky choice for hotels that need reliability and support. roommaster Payments, backed by recent positive feedback, provides a comprehensive, hotel-tailored payment solution with extensive integrations.
If your hotel values proven support and a rich feature set, opt for roommaster Payments. Its recent reviews and high user ratings demonstrate current reliability. Conversely, if you're only in need of minimal, non-region-specific processing, ePay might suffice—though its lack of recent validation makes it less appealing.
In conclusion, roommaster Payments is the safer, more feature-rich choice based on recent hotel reviews and ongoing support. ePay’s limited presence and absence of recent user feedback suggest it’s not an optimal solution for hotels aiming for operational efficiency and security.
La tarification des Logiciel de traitement des paiements est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| REPAY |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, ePay et roommaster Payments partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepte les visas | ||
| Ajustements d'autorisation | ||
| Capture partielle | ||
| Fonction de gratuité | ||
| Gestion des remboursements | ||
| Payer par lien |
Affichage des principales differences. 1 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. ePay et roommaster Payments partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Payments Processing Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. ePay propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que roommaster Payments en propose 56. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. roommaster Payments est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.2/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
ePay : Non. roommaster Payments : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Payments Processing Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. REPAY a un HT Score de 0 et roommaster a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété