The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HIS MSC Company Limited se distingue .
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HIS MSC Company Limited apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) involves balancing comprehensive features, ease of use, support quality, and integration capabilities. HIS MSC’s epitome PMS, despite its longstanding presence, has no recent reviews and a total score of zero, making it impossible to assess its current performance or user satisfaction. Conversely, HotelTime PMS boasts over 430 reviews, a high score of 91.17, and recent feedback, establishing it as the more reliable option for your hotel’s needs.
Given the stark contrast in review activity and recency, HotelTime provides a more trustworthy foundation for decision-making. But how do these differences translate into day-to-day operational benefits?
HIS MSC’s epitome PMS claims to be a globally integrated solution, focusing on reducing manual workloads and streamlining operations. However, with no recent reviews or user feedback, its real-world effectiveness remains unverified. HotelTime, on the other hand, is actively used across 650+ properties in 20+ countries, with recent reviews praising its ability to manage reservations, invoicing, and guest services efficiently.
While HIS MSC’s system may offer extensive functionality in theory, HotelTime’s proven track record and recent positive reviews suggest it is more reliable for your hotel’s operational needs today. Are you confident in deploying a system with no recent user insights?
If your hotel needs a system with proven, current user satisfaction, go with HotelTime. It’s preferred if you value a cloud-based platform with extensive integrations, real-time reporting, and a broad feature set—like automation, POS, guest CRM, and mobile check-in—verified by hundreds of recent reviews. HIS MSC might appeal if you prioritize a globally recognized brand with historical roots, but without recent feedback, its suitability is uncertain.
Hotels that require scalable, well-supported solutions with active client communities should lean toward HotelTime. Conversely, if your hotel operates in regions where HIS MSC has a presence and values legacy systems, it might still be worth exploring, though the lack of recent reviews is a concern.
HotelTime’s user interface scores a 4.66/5, with many users highlighting its intuitive design and straightforward onboarding. Customers frequently mention that staff learn the system quickly and that daily operations feel streamlined once familiar, supported by detailed onboarding and ongoing support.
HIS MSC, however, has a zero rating for ease of use and onboarding, with no recent reviews to gauge user sentiment. Without current feedback, it’s impossible to determine whether its interface is user-friendly or if staff adoption would be smooth. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers an impressive suite of 51 features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, housekeeping modules, online booking, and more. Many features—like automated night audit, digital registration, and group booking—are absent from HIS MSC, which provides no detailed feature list for comparison.
HIS MSC’s lack of documented features and no recent updates leave its capabilities uncertain. HotelTime’s extensive feature count and active development give it a clear advantage. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime consistently earns reviews praising its responsive, knowledgeable support team, with a 4.73/5 customer support rating and recent positive comments about quick responses and helpful onboarding. Many users appreciate the ongoing assistance that helps them maximize the platform’s potential.
HIS MSC again offers no recent reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to judge its support quality today. The absence of feedback diminishes confidence in its post-sale service. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime features 58 verified integrations, including popular partners like Profitroom, Bookboost, STR, and many other third-party systems, allowing for a tailored tech stack. HIS MSC, by contrast, has no verified integrations listed, limiting its interoperability.
For hotels looking to connect with external systems easily, HotelTime’s extensive integration network is a significant plus. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s recent reviews consistently rate it highly, with an overall score of 4.83/5, and a likelihood to recommend of 93%. Hotels across segments like resorts, boutique hotels, and city center properties praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
HIS MSC’s total reviews and ratings are nonexistent or outdated, making it impossible to determine current user satisfaction. With recent positive feedback, HotelTime clearly holds the edge. Edge: HotelTime.
HIS MSC does not publish its pricing, nor does it offer a trial, making cost estimation difficult. HotelTime charges $600 per month, with no mention of setup fees or discounts, providing transparency for budgeting.
While HIS MSC’s pricing remains unknown, the clear, public pricing of HotelTime simplifies your decision process. Edge: HotelTime.
Not ideal if you require current user feedback, extensive integrations, or cloud flexibility. HIS MSC may be suited for specific regional markets, but the lack of recent data limits confidence.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in regions where HIS MSC’s presence is stronger or if you prefer legacy, on-premise systems. HotelTime’s broad applicability makes it suitable for most modern hotels.
HIS MSC’s epitome PMS is a legacy system with no recent reviews, leaving its current performance and support unclear. HotelTime, by contrast, is an actively supported, feature-rich platform with thousands of recent reviews attesting to its usability, support, and scalability.
If your priority is a system with recent, verified user satisfaction and extensive features, HotelTime is the clear choice. HIS MSC might still appeal to specific regional or legacy needs but lacks the current user validation that modern hotels require.
Hotels seeking a reliable, well-supported PMS should opt for HotelTime. Larger, more traditional or region-specific hotels might consider HIS MSC if they are comfortable with the lack of recent feedback and potential integration limitations, though the risk remains.
In conclusion, for most hotels today, HotelTime offers the confidence, features, and support necessary to run operations smoothly and grow efficiently.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC) et HotelTime PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC) et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC) propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
epitome PMS (by HIS-MSC) : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HIS MSC Company Limited a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits