The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Fersterer se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
Notes comparees basees sur 169 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 169 |
Apres analyse de 169 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Fersterer apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant interface utilisateur et rapports, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Fersterer |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface utilisateur et rapports
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personnalisation et flexibilité
▾
|
|
|
−
Améliorations opérationnelles
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Fersterer |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 44 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 94 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 7 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #2 9 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Fersterer |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 74 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 41 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #3 31 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 12 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Fersterer |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 14 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 130 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique | — | #5 4 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #6 0 avis |
Choosing the right hotel POS system can significantly impact your operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Fersterer Tk32 and Mews POS aim to streamline your front-of-house processes, but their approaches, features, and market presence differ widely. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize extensive integrations, usability, and support or cutting-edge analytics and automation.
Fersterer, with no recent reviews or active feedback, appears to be a niche or lesser-known option. Meanwhile, Mews POS, boasting over 150 recent reviews and a 95% likelihood to recommend, is clearly more established and trusted. How do these contrasting profiles influence your choice?
Fersterer Tk32 claims to provide advanced revenue management capabilities powered by real-time analytics and automation. However, it has no current user reviews or ratings, leaving its real-world effectiveness and usability unverified.
In contrast, Mews POS has amassed over 150 recent reviews, with a strong emphasis on its seamless PMS integration, user-friendly interface, and operational automation. Its high NPS score of 9.32 out of 10 underscores high user satisfaction and frequent recommendation.
While Fersterer is marketed as an innovative revenue system, its lack of recent verification makes it difficult to assess its practical benefits. Mews, on the other hand, demonstrates proven performance, supported by recent hotel experiences. Are you comfortable relying on unverified claims, or do recent user insights guide your decision?
If your hotel needs a reliable, easy-to-adopt POS with a proven track record, go with Mews. Its extensive and recent review base confirms high ease of use, support, and feature richness, making it ideal for properties seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
If, however, your hotel is exploring cutting-edge revenue management with automation and analytics, and you are willing to accept the risk of untested deployment, Fersterer might appeal. But without verified user feedback, its practical benefits and ease of implementation remain uncertain.
For most hoteliers, especially those valuing proven support and user satisfaction, Mews is the safer choice. Fersterer’s niche positioning and lack of recent reviews favor Mews as the more reliable option.
User reviews highlight Mews POS’s intuitive, modern interface, rated 4.74 out of 5, and its straightforward onboarding process with an average rating of 4.39. Multiple reports praise its cross-device functionality, allowing staff to operate seamlessly from desktops, tablets, or smartphones.
Fersterer, on the other hand, has no recent ratings or reviews, making its usability assumptions speculative. The absence of user feedback suggests it has not been widely tested or adopted.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS offers a broad suite of 29 features, including PCI compliance, discounts, upselling, digital menus, online ordering, inventory and ingredient management, customer insights, and integration with accounting software. These functionalities directly support restaurant and hotel F&B operations.
Fersterer provides no documented features beyond revenue management, positioning itself more as an analytics tool rather than a comprehensive POS platform.
Given Mews’s extensive feature set tailored for hotel F&B needs, it clearly outstrips Fersterer in capabilities. Edge: Mews POS.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Fersterer, leaving its support quality unknown. Its lack of active user feedback suggests limited or no current support engagement.
Mews, with a 4.43 out of 5 support rating from 156 reviews, has an established reputation for reliable support and onboarding. Users describe their support as “solution-oriented” and “reliable,” which is critical for smooth deployment and ongoing operations.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, Orange Hotel Marketing, and FLEXIPASS. Its ecosystem supports extensive third-party connectivity, covering PMS, revenue, marketing, and operational tools.
Fersterer has no verified integrations or partner network, significantly limiting its flexibility and scalability within hotel tech stacks.
For hotels seeking an adaptable platform with an expansive ecosystem, Mews dominates. Edge: Mews POS.
With over 150 recent reviews, Mews’s overall rating of 4.74/5 for ease of use and 4.43/5 for support showcases consistent hotel satisfaction. Hoteliers across segments, especially boutique, city-center, and small hotels, praise its simplicity and operational impact.
Fersterer’s lack of recent reviews means its rating is unknown and unverified in current hotel operations. Its unknown reputation makes it a risky choice for hoteliers.
Given the abundant recent feedback, Mews is the clearly higher-rated product. Edge: Mews POS.
Fersterer’s pricing is undisclosed, with no free trial or clear payment model available. This opacity complicates cost comparisons and budgeting.
Mews charges a $200 monthly base fee, with no free trial, but the transparent pricing provides clarity for budgeting. The cost reflects its broad feature set and extensive integrations.
For budget-conscious hotels valuing transparency, Mews offers clearer value. Fersterer’s cost remains uncertain, making it a less predictable investment.
Fersterer’s AI-driven approach suits revenue-focused hotels that are comfortable with less tangible, analytics-based solutions.
Mews is suited for hotels wanting a comprehensive, cloud-based POS integrated with their PMS and wider tech stack.
Fersterer Tk32 positions itself as a revenue management tool driven by AI analytics, focusing on optimizing income streams through automation. Its lack of recent verified user feedback makes it difficult to assess its real-world operational value.
Mews POS, with a proven track record, offers a complete hotel POS platform with over 150 recent reviews, high user satisfaction, and a broad ecosystem of integrations. It supports front-of-house operations, supports guest engagement, and delivers tangible operational benefits.
If your hotel values proven usability, extensive features, and strong ongoing support, Mews POS is the clear choice. Fersterer might appeal to niche markets or hotels specifically seeking advanced revenue analytics, but the risks are higher without verified recent feedback.
In most cases, Mews POS’s established reputation and recent positive hotel reviews make it the safer, more effective investment for your hotel’s POS needs.
La tarification des Systèmes de point de vente hôteliers est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Fersterer |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Fersterer Tk32 et Mews POS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Fersterer |
|
|---|---|---|
| Conforme PCI | ||
| Fractionnement des chèques | ||
| Menus numériques | ||
| Rapports de journal de paiement | ||
| Réductions et promotions | ||
| Vente incitative |
Affichage des principales differences. 17 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations con... L'interface de Mews est décrite comme moderne et intuitive, facilitant une navigation fluide. Cependant, certains avis suggèrent des améliorations concernant la complexité et la flexibilité des outils de reporting, notamment pour les configurations multi-établissements et l'analyse opérationnelle détaillée.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérien... La plateforme est appréciée pour ses options de personnalisation, permettant des flux de travail et des alertes sur mesure afin d'améliorer l'expérience client. Cependant, les utilisateurs expriment également le besoin de fonctionnalités de personnalisation plus intuitives pour répondre à des besoins opérationnels spécifiques et aux interactions avec les clients.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Fersterer Tk32 et Mews POS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel POS Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Fersterer Tk32 propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews POS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews POS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Fersterer Tk32 : Non. Mews POS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel POS Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Fersterer a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits