The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Flatswire se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Flatswire apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Flatswire |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between Flatswire and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and the value you place on recent feedback and comprehensive features. While Flatswire’s presence is virtually nonexistent in reviews and market data, Mews boasts a dominant reputation with over 750 reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a recent surge in positive feedback, especially in ease of use and support. Which platform will better serve your property’s current and future needs?
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but Mews excels in its extensive integrations, user-friendly design, and broad industry adoption. Flatswire’s limited review data and lack of verified features place it at a significant disadvantage. Are you prepared to rely on a solution with proven industry backing and ongoing innovation?
Flatswire offers a comprehensive property management solution tailored primarily for property managers, with functionalities spanning tenant management to maintenance. However, it appears to lack the adaptability needed for hotels, especially those seeking an integrated guest experience. Conversely, Mews is a cloud-native system explicitly designed for the hospitality sector, offering over 59 features including booking management, guest CRM, revenue tools, and extensive integrations.
Mews’s broad regional presence—operating across 54 countries—along with its focus on scalability, positions it as the more mature solution. Given its recent review momentum and high recommendation scores, Mews clearly outperforms Flatswire in industry trust. Do you want a platform proven in hospitality, or a less well-documented property system?
If your hotel needs a flexible, fully integrated PMS capable of supporting multi-property management, guest engagement, and revenue optimization, go with Mews. Its extensive feature set, over 336 verified integrations, and proven scalability make it ideal for hotels that prioritize operational automation and guest satisfaction.
If you are looking for a tenant-focused system primarily managing lease or property portfolios, and are less concerned with guest-centric features, Flatswire might seem suitable—though the lack of recent reviews and verified functionalities makes it a risky choice. For hotel operators, Mews remains the clear leader in industry-specific solutions.
Mews’s user interface has received high praise, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating and over 98 recent reviews, many raving about its intuitive setup and straightforward onboarding. Customers report that staff adoption is quick, with many mentioning that the platform’s modern design simplifies daily tasks.
Flatswire, on the other hand, has no review ratings or recent feedback to gauge its usability. Its lack of visible user experience data casts doubt on its practicality for busy hotel teams. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a robust suite with 59 unique features including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online booking engine, guest CRM, housekeeping modules, integrated CRS, and automated reports. Flatswire provides no verified features or differentiators, making it impossible to compare on functional depth.
Given the extensive feature count and proven capabilities of Mews, it clearly holds the advantage here. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings are solid, with a 4.27/5 score and over 98 recent reviews praising its responsiveness, onboarding assistance, and continuous updates. Many reviews mention that Mews support is proactive and helpful, often resolving issues swiftly.
There are no recent reviews or support ratings for Flatswire, and its negative comments highlight a lack of support on implementation and system understanding. Based on available data, Mews’s support outperforms Flatswire significantly. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and third-party apps like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Flatswire appears to have no verified integrations, limiting its adaptability.
This extensive ecosystem enables hotels to customize operations to their needs, a critical factor for modern properties. Edge: Mews.
Mews enjoys a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 758 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, support, and scalability. Its property management solution is highly favored across various hotel segments, notably boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties.
Flatswire has no recent or verified reviews, making it impossible to determine hotel satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of Mews reviews, it is the preferred choice. Edge: Mews.
Flatswire’s pricing details are not publicly available, suggesting it may not have transparent or scalable pricing models. Mews’s pricing starts at $900/month with no implementation fees, making it a predictable investment for hotels seeking comprehensive solutions.
While the actual costs for Flatswire remain unclear, Mews’s transparent pricing and extensive features offer better value for hotels committed to growth and operational excellence.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes guest experience, automation, or multi-property management, as Flatswire lacks visible features and recent reviews supporting these needs.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very limited budget or prefers legacy, on-premise systems without cloud features.
Mews stands out as the clear leader in hotel property management, with proven, recent reviews validating its ease of use, support, and feature depth. Flatswire, lacking recent data and verified functionalities, appears unsuitable for modern hotel operations.
If your hotel needs a scalable, industry-proven PMS that enhances guest satisfaction and operational efficiency, go with Mews. Its extensive ecosystem and customer satisfaction scores make it the safest and most future-proof choice.
Choose Flatswire only if your operational focus is on property or tenant management with no requirement for hotel-specific features, but be wary of the limited data supporting its efficacy. For true hotel management, Mews remains the definitive platform.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Flatswire |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Flatswire et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Flatswire et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Flatswire propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Flatswire : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Flatswire a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits