The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Flyhotel se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Flyhotel apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between Flyhotel by Flyhotel and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and tech ambitions. While Flyhotel is a lesser-known system with limited reviews and features, Mews offers a comprehensive, scalable platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide. Both aim to streamline your front desk and reservation processes, but their capabilities and support differ significantly. Are you ready to prioritize a proven, widely supported system?
Flyhotel is a small, niche PMS with zero ratings and no recent reviews, making it difficult to gauge its reliability or suitability. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with 98 recent ones, reflecting current user experiences and ongoing development. The stark difference in review volume and recency makes Mews the more dependable choice for hotels seeking consistent support and innovation.
Both systems aim to automate reservations, check-ins, and reporting, but Mews’s extensive features and user feedback suggest a higher level of maturity. Flyhotel’s lack of a market presence and reviews means it likely lacks the robustness and integrations that modern hotels increasingly rely on. Would you risk operational uncertainty with Flyhotel, or lean on Mews’s extensive proven track record?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based, scalable system with over 336 verified integrations, Mews is the clear choice. Its client base spans boutique hotels, hostels, and large chains, with high ratings for ease of use, support, and value. For hotels focused on growth, automation, and guest experience, Mews’s extensive feature set and global presence make it the superior option.
Flyhotel might appeal if your property operates in a very niche market or if budget constraints prohibit investing in a more comprehensive platform. However, with zero reviews and no clear pricing or feature roadmap, it’s unlikely to meet the demands of a modern, tech-forward hotel. Are you comfortable with an untested system, or do you prefer a platform with proven results?
Mews’s user-friendly interface and highly rated onboarding (4.39/5 from 98 recent reviews) make it accessible for staff at all levels. Hotels praise Mews for its intuitive design, quick setup, and minimal training time. Flyhotel’s lack of reviews prevents a direct usability comparison, but its absence in the market suggests it may not match Mews’s polished, proven user experience.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, booking engine, guest CRM, housekeeping, revenue management, online check-in, real-time reporting, and extensive integrations. Flyhotel’s feature set is unlisted, implying it may lack the depth and breadth needed for complex operations.
Mews’s marketplace alone provides access to over 1,000 integrations, including POS, revenue tools, and channel managers, making it highly adaptable. Flyhotel’s limited or unknown feature offerings make it unlikely to support sophisticated or multi-channel operations.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings (4.27/5 from recent reviews) highlight responsive, helpful assistance during onboarding and ongoing use. Customers frequently mention Mews’s support as a key factor in their satisfaction, with some reporting issues but quick resolutions.
Flyhotel’s review absence means support quality cannot be assessed, but lesser-known or unreviewed solutions often lack dedicated, responsive support. Given the importance of support in day-to-day operations, Mews’s established reputation makes it the safer choice.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and payment processors. Its open API and marketplace provide extensive customization options, accommodating various tech ecosystems.
Flyhotel has zero verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with other essential hotel systems. For a modern, flexible operation, this makes Mews the clear winner.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s review count and recent feedback (98 reviews in the last six months, 4.62/5 overall) outshine Flyhotel’s nonexistent reviews. Hotels across segments—from boutique to large chains—appreciate Mews’s ease of use, support, and feature richness.
Flyhotel’s lack of reviews means there’s no reliable data on user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences. For a property that values peer feedback, Mews’s high ratings are decisive.
Edge: Mews.
Flyhotel’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to lack a free trial or transparent fee structure. Mews charges a base price of $900 monthly, with no implementation or setup fees, and offers a clear SaaS model.
Given the lack of pricing clarity for Flyhotel, Mews’s straightforward model and value-based ratings (4.39/5 for ROI) make it the more predictable investment for your hotel’s budget.
Not ideal if your hotel values reliability, features, or scalability, especially in multi-property environments.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in a very simple, manual, or offline context, or if you’re looking for a free or very low-cost solution without support.
Mews’s core advantage is its proven track record, comprehensive features, and extensive integrations, backed by thousands of positive reviews and ongoing updates. It’s designed for hotels that want reliable, scalable operations with a focus on automation and guest satisfaction.
Choose Mews if you need a system that supports your growth, provides excellent support, and offers a rich ecosystem of third-party tools. Its high review volume and recent positive feedback make it the clear choice, especially for hotels that want to avoid operational risks.
Flyhotel may suit very small, niche properties with minimal tech needs, but the lack of reviews, features, and support makes it a risky choice. If your hotel plans to grow or prioritize guest experience, Mews’s established platform is the smarter investment.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Flyhotel |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Flyhotel et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Flyhotel et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Flyhotel propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Flyhotel : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Flyhotel a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits