The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 441 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
FranklyView se distingue .
GuestRevu se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.6/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue Reporting and Reporting Dashboard.
Notes comparees basees sur 441 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 441 |
Apres analyse de 441 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de FranklyView apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de GuestRevu mettent en avant feedback and reporting, integration and compatibility, ai and automation. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Feedback and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Compatibility
▾
|
|
|
+
AI and Automation
▾
|
|
|
+
Dashboard and Interface
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Analyse des sentiments
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Gestion de la réputation pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 161 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 179 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 20 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 19 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 198 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #1 199 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #3 91 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #2 37 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #3 37 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 111 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #2 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient | — | #4 3 avis |
Choosing between FranklyView and GuestRevu hinges on your hotel’s specific reputation management needs. Both aim to improve guest feedback and online ratings but approach these goals differently. FranklyView mainly focuses on guest engagement and direct sales, while GuestRevu offers extensive review collection, analysis, and automation features. How do your priorities align with what each platform delivers?
FranklyView appears to target hotels that want to actively upsell, pre-arrival engagement, and post-stay feedback, whereas GuestRevu emphasizes review consolidation, sentiment analysis, and operational insights. Which features are more vital for your team right now?
FranklyView and GuestRevu both aim to boost online reputation, but their methods diverge. FranklyView emphasizes direct guest interaction through pre-registration, upselling, and targeted feedback, helping hotels build direct relationships and increase repeat bookings. GuestRevu, by contrast, centralizes reviews from platforms like TripAdvisor and Google, and automates sentiment analysis and response suggestions, making review management more efficient.
GuestRevu’s recent reviews are more plentiful and recent—over 80 reviews from the last six months—compared to no recent feedback for FranklyView, indicating more current user satisfaction. This makes GuestRevu more reliable for understanding how hotels feel about these tools today. Does your hotel need more direct guest engagement or review aggregation and analysis?
If your hotel needs a review-focused platform with extensive review collection, sentiment analysis, and operational insights, GuestRevu is the clear choice. It supports 40 verified integrations, a user rating of 4.61/5, and recent reviews praising its ease of use and helpful support.
Conversely, if your team prioritizes pre-arrival guest engagement, upselling, and post-stay feedback to drive direct bookings, FranklyView could be more suitable. However, given its lack of recent reviews and zero ratings, it’s difficult to gauge current functionality or customer satisfaction. For most hotels, GuestRevu’s recent high ratings and feature set make it the safer pick.
GuestRevu boasts a user rating of 4.63/5 and recent positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and simple setup. Users praise its dashboard, customizable surveys, and smooth onboarding, making it accessible even for teams with limited technical skills.
FranklyView, with a zero-star rating and no recent feedback, offers no data on ease of use. Based on available information, GuestRevu’s proven usability and high customer support scores strongly favor it. Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu offers 31 unique features, including sentiment analysis, social media tools, revenue reporting, alerts, multi-property management, AI-generated responses, and more. These features enable comprehensive review management, guest insight, and operational automation.
FranklyView provides no additional features beyond its core guest feedback collection, upsell, and review boosting capabilities. It lacks the advanced analytics, automation, and social media tools that make GuestRevu more versatile. Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu’s support ratings are high, with a 4.75/5 score and recent reviews praising their responsiveness and proactive assistance. Users mention that the team’s support has been instrumental in onboarding and ongoing use, making their platform easier to manage.
FranklyView has no recent ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess support quality. Based on current data, GuestRevu’s customer service is the clear leader. Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu integrates with 40 verified partners, including major OTAs and property management systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Amadeus, and Criton. It covers a broad range of platforms, offering flexible, multi-channel review management.
FranklyView’s three verified integrations—none of which are recent or extensive—limit its connectivity. For comprehensive review and reputation management, GuestRevu significantly outperforms on integration options. Edge: GuestRevu.
With a recent review score of 4.61/5 and 386 reviews, GuestRevu consistently receives high marks across hotel segments, especially among boutique and independent hotels. Hotels in these segments praise its ease of use, customization, and support.
FranklyView has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on current data, GuestRevu's ratings reflect broader hotel trust and positive experiences. Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu charges a straightforward $100/month, with no free tier or trial info available. FranklyView does not list any pricing details, implying that it may require custom quotes or that information is unavailable publicly.
Given GuestRevu’s transparent pricing and the lack of data for FranklyView, budget-conscious hotels should lean toward GuestRevu, unless FranklyView’s actual costs are favorable. Clear pricing favors GuestRevu.
Not ideal if you rely heavily on review monitoring or need extensive automation and social media tools.
Not ideal if you prefer a platform solely for upsell and pre-arrival engagement or have very limited budgets.
FranklyView offers targeted guest insights, upsell opportunities, and pre-arrival engagement but lacks recent reviews and detailed feature set evidence. It’s best suited for small hotels focused on direct bookings and operational feedback, provided you can verify its current effectiveness.
GuestRevu, with over 80 recent reviews and a 4.61/5 rating, stands out as a comprehensive reputation management solution. Its automation, integrations, and support make it a strong choice for most hotels looking to improve online reputation and guest satisfaction.
If you value recent user feedback, high ratings, and a rich feature set, GuestRevu is the clear leader. Its extensive integrations and proven support give your team the tools needed to manage reviews efficiently and effectively.
For hotels prioritizing review collection, sentiment analysis, and operational insights, GuestRevu is the recommended platform. If your focus is on direct guest engagement and upselling, investigate whether FranklyView’s current capabilities meet your needs — but proceed with caution given the lack of recent reviews.
La tarification des Gestion de la réputation est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, FranklyView et GuestRevu partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Alertes et notifications | ||
| Analyse des sentiments | ||
| Des médias sociaux | ||
| Déclaration de revenus | ||
| Tableau de bord des rapports | ||
| Veille concurrentielle |
Affichage des principales differences. 19 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 7 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"GuestRevu has helped us so much over the past two years as we see our small business growing – the reviews from guests are like gold, and most of our bookings have been made becaus..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since implementing GuestRevu, our complaints have actually come down, because of the fact that we have so many repeat guests and now we can interact with them in much more detail...."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Users consistently highlight GuestRevu's detailed feedback collection and insightful reporting features, which provide actionable information for serv... Users consistently highlight GuestRevu's detailed feedback collection and insightful reporting features, which provide actionable information for service enhancement and operational efficiency. The system's capacity to gather insights from multiple platforms enables hotels to quickly identify both strengths and areas needing improvement.
GuestRevu integrates well with various systems, including renowned OTAs like Google, TripAdvisor, Booking.com, enhancing ease of use by centralizing r... GuestRevu integrates well with various systems, including renowned OTAs like Google, TripAdvisor, Booking.com, enhancing ease of use by centralizing review management. However, some users express a need for expanded integration options, including additional property management systems and direct connections to platforms like TripAdvisor to further streamline operations.
Many reviewers appreciate the AI-driven analytics and automated response features of GuestRevu, which reduce manual effort and improve response time a... Many reviewers appreciate the AI-driven analytics and automated response features of GuestRevu, which reduce manual effort and improve response time and consistency. While praised for efficiency, some users find AI-generated responses overly mechanical or lacking a personalized touch, suggesting room for refinement.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
L'analyse des sentiments de la plateforme est reconnue pour son classement pertinent des commentaires en catégories, bien qu'elle soit parfois jugée i... L'analyse des sentiments de la plateforme est reconnue pour son classement pertinent des commentaires en catégories, bien qu'elle soit parfois jugée inexacte. Les utilisateurs signalent des problèmes d'interprétation du ton par l'algorithme, notamment du sarcasme, ce qui nuit à la clarté des analyses automatisées.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. FranklyView et GuestRevu partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Reputation Management de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. FranklyView propose 3 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que GuestRevu en propose 40. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. GuestRevu est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
FranklyView : Non. GuestRevu : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Reputation Management proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. FranklyView a un HT Score de 0 et GuestRevu a 96. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits