The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
GRAND se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest Messaging.
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 549 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de GRAND apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de HOTELTIME mettent en avant user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #5 219 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 238 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #2 46 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #8 7 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #3 241 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #4 143 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #4 49 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | — | #52 4 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 384 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #5 111 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #1 21 avis |
Choosing between GRAND PMS by GRAND and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both products aim to streamline management tasks, improve guest experiences, and centralize operations, but they diverge sharply in features, user feedback, and market presence. With HOTELTIME boasting a significantly higher review count and more recent reviews, it clearly holds a stronger position in the current market. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
GRAND PMS and HotelTime PMS are both cloud-based property management systems designed to improve hotel operations. GRAND offers a single, intuitive platform that unifies bookings, housekeeping, billing, and reporting, with additional tools for event management and proposals. HotelTime, meanwhile, provides a broad suite of features, including reservations, spa and restaurant management, and extensive integrations, making it suitable for properties of all sizes. While GRAND’s interface emphasizes automation and simplicity, HotelTime’s strength lies in its extensive, feature-rich environment.
However, the critical difference is in their market credibility: HOTELTIME has over 430 reviews, with most recent feedback from the last six months, giving it a more current and comprehensive understanding of user experiences. GRAND’s lack of reviews makes it difficult to assess its real-world performance. Would you prefer a platform with proven market validation or a newer system with limited feedback?
If your hotel requires a flexible, feature-dense platform capable of handling complex operations across multiple departments and locations, HotelTime is the clear choice. It is suitable for properties of all sizes, including resorts, city hotels, and large groups, thanks to its extensive integrations and modules like POS, guest CRM, revenue management, and automation tools.
On the other hand, if your team prioritizes a straightforward, AI-powered interface that simplifies daily tasks and reduces manual work, GRAND could appeal — although the absence of user feedback makes this less certain. Hotels looking for proven reliability and broad functionality should lean toward HotelTime, especially given its larger, more recent review base.
HotelTime’s user interface scores a 4.66 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive design, simple navigation, and quick onboarding. Support and onboarding ratings at 4.73 indicate your team will likely find it straightforward to adopt, with many users mentioning minimal training time and smooth implementation.
In contrast, GRAND’s review score for ease of use is 0, reflecting no data or user feedback. This lack of reviews makes it impossible to assess onboarding or user experience. Based on available data, Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 38 features exclusive to its platform, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audit, mobile app, revenue management, and online check-in. Its broader feature set allows for comprehensive management of hotel and venue operations, reducing the need for multiple systems.
GRAND offers only one feature exclusive to its platform: guest messaging, with the remaining 13 shared features. Its limited feature count suggests a narrower scope, potentially less suitable for complex, multi-department hotels. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime consistently receives positive reviews about support, with a 4.73 out of 5 rating and comments like, “Support team is responsive and helpful,” and “Support staff are always on the other end of the phone.” Many users praise the onboarding process and continual assistance, which appears to enhance user confidence.
GRAND’s support ratings are at zero; no reviews or data are available to gauge support quality. Without recent customer feedback, the clear edge goes to HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including popular systems like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, offering extensive customization options. Shared integrations are minimal, but the breadth of available partners supports robust hotel tech stacks.
GRAND has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other tools and systems. For hotels seeking a highly connected platform, Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83 out of 5, with 433 reviews, indicates strong satisfaction across multiple hotel segments. Recent reviews praise its flexibility, customer support, and features, with property types like resorts and city hotels rating it near perfect.
GRAND, with no reviews, cannot be rated by users. The clear choice based on user ratings and recent feedback is HotelTime.
GRAND’s pricing details are unavailable, but its base price is listed at $900, with no mention of freemium options or monthly plans. Conversely, HotelTime’s base price starts at $600, with similar no-trial, no-implementation fees.
Given the lack of detailed pricing for GRAND, HotelTime presents a more transparent and competitive model for hotels of various sizes.
Not ideal if...
Edge: Not recommended without more feedback on GRAND’s real-world performance.
Not ideal if...
Edge: Hotels that need a proven, feature-packed platform with broad support.
The core difference is in market presence and user feedback: HotelTime’s large, recent review base confirms its reliability and customer satisfaction, while GRAND remains largely untested in the field. If your hotel values a feature-rich, well-supported system, HotelTime’s extensive modules and integrations make it the stronger choice.
Choose GRAND if your hotel values simplicity, AI automation, and guest messaging, and if you’re willing to accept less proven performance. However, for most hotels seeking a dependable, full-featured platform, HotelTime provides a safer, more validated solution.
In conclusion, HotelTime’s broad features, proven support, and extensive integrations make it the preferred choice for hotels aiming for operational excellence. GRAND’s potential is evident, but without more recent reviews, its suitability remains uncertain. We recommend HotelTime for hotels prioritizing reliability and comprehensive management tools today.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, GRAND PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent 13 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Tarifs personnalisés | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 27 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. GRAND PMS et HotelTime PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. GRAND PMS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que HotelTime PMS en propose 58. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
GRAND PMS : Non. HotelTime PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. GRAND a un HT Score de 0 et HOTELTIME a 92. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits