The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
GRAND se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de GRAND apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between GRAND PMS by GRAND and Mews PMS by Mews requires understanding how each addresses your hotel’s operational needs. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but their approaches and market presence differ significantly. GRAND promises a next-generation, AI-powered platform but lacks recent user feedback and reviews, casting doubt on its current reliability. Mews, on the other hand, boasts over 750 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions?
GRAND positions itself as a forward-thinking, cloud-based platform that unifies hotel and venue operations, emphasizing automation and collaboration. However, with zero recent reviews and a lack of user feedback, it remains an untested option in today’s competitive landscape. Mews, by contrast, benefits from a robust global user base and recent reviews that validate its claims through real-world experiences. The 98 recent reviews in the last six months underscore its ongoing development and responsiveness to user needs.
While GRAND aims to combine event management and proposals into an integrated platform, its current absence of user ratings and independent reviews makes it difficult to validate its performance. Mews’s high 4.62/5 rating and 93% likelihood to recommend reflect consistent user satisfaction. Are you willing to risk an unproven system, or do you prefer a platform already validated by hundreds of hoteliers?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, well-supported PMS with proven integrations, scalability, and a large community of active users, go with Mews. Its extensive features—over 45 exclusive modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and integrated channel management—make it a versatile choice for properties of all sizes. Conversely, if your hotel seeks a futuristic, AI-driven platform with built-in event management and proposals, and if you’re comfortable with unverified claims, GRAND might appeal. But given the lack of recent validation, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer bet.
For hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, seamless integrations, and customer support, Mews delivers a more mature ecosystem. If innovation and experimental features are your priority, GRAND’s promises are enticing, but the absence of recent user experience data makes it a risky choice. Would you rather rely on a platform with proven performance or gamble on an untested, emerging system?
Mews scores a near-perfect 4.7/5 for ease of use, with consistent user praise for its intuitive, modern interface and simple onboarding process. Its high ratings (98 recent reviews) indicate ongoing satisfaction, ease of adoption, and positive staff experiences. Conversely, GRAND provides no visible user ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its usability or onboarding experience. The lack of validation suggests potential usability issues or untested features.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a comprehensive suite of 45+ features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated POS, real-time reporting, and a vast marketplace with over 1,000 integrations. GRAND, on the other hand, claims to unify bookings, housekeeping, billing, and event management but offers no detailed feature count or independent validation of its capabilities.
Given the extensive, proven features and active development, Mews clearly has a more mature and feature-rich ecosystem. Its dedicated modules support a wide range of hotel operations, surpassing GRAND’s unverified offerings. Which platform do you trust to provide a broad, reliable feature set?
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a strong reputation for customer support, with an average support rating of 4.27/5 based on recent reviews. Users describe its support team as quick, helpful, and proactive, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. GRAND’s support experience is unverified, with no recent reviews or independent feedback available, raising concerns about responsiveness and reliability.
Given Mews’s proven support track record and recent positive reviews, it’s the safer choice for hotels that value dependable assistance during implementation and daily operations. Without validation, GRAND’s support remains uncertain. Which support system would you prefer to rely on?
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent review count of 758 and a high 93% likelihood to recommend position it as the more trusted platform among hoteliers. Its reviews highlight consistent satisfaction, ease of use, and tangible operational gains across diverse property types. GRAND’s absence of recent reviews and user feedback means it lacks current validation or confidence from the hotel community.
For properties seeking proven stability and peer affirmation, Mews’s large, active user base and recent high ratings make it the clear leader. Are you comfortable adopting a system with no recent user validation, or do you prefer one endorsed by hundreds?
Edge: Mews.
Both GRAND and Mews are priced at a flat $900 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation fees or tiered pricing options. However, the lack of detailed pricing tiers or optional modules makes it difficult to assess long-term value, especially for smaller properties or those seeking flexible packages.
Since Mews is well-documented and includes a clear, comparable pricing structure, hoteliers can better forecast costs and ROI. GRAND’s pricing appears straightforward but lacks transparency about potential additional charges or scalable options. Which pricing approach aligns better with your budget planning?
Not ideal if:
Edge: Not recommended due to lack of recent validation.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Grand’s promise of a next-generation, AI-driven platform is compelling but remains unvalidated for real-world hotel operations. Without recent reviews, its reliability, support, and feature set are uncertain, making it a risky choice for most hotels.
Mews, in contrast, is a mature, extensively reviewed platform trusted by hundreds of hoteliers worldwide. Its proven ease of use, broad feature set, and active support network make it a more dependable and scalable option for hotels ready to grow.
If your hotel values stability, proven performance, and extensive integration capabilities, choose Mews. If you’re an innovator willing to accept the risk of unproven technology, GRAND might appeal, but be prepared for potential pitfalls.
In conclusion, for most hotels, Mews’s recent validation and large user community make it the preferable choice.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, GRAND PMS et Mews PMS partagent 14 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Tarifs personnalisés |
Affichage des principales differences. 33 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. GRAND PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. GRAND PMS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
GRAND PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. GRAND a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits